rule of law (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

willingtosuck -> rule of law (3/17/2010 8:06:04 PM)

3/17/201
When I was arrested on 5/19/2009 and taken to the Jones County Texas jail, the next morning when the “Judge” as he was called came to set my bond. So I could get out. This Judge was the justice of the peace he is crippled and uses crutches to walk. He has in fact married me once so I recognized him for his position. The deputy that arrested me lied to me to get me to come out of the house and again a Jones County official would lie to me the judge said you can’t get a jury trial on a mistomener crime!! The Lawyers I spoke with both said this was a lie. HOW can our president either one Bush or Obama say we have rule of law when the judges and cops lie???



slvemike4u -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:09:59 PM)

Too easy.....way too easy.I'm going to pass....



LadyEllen -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:13:07 PM)

Texas? Its a wonder youre not posting from death row.

What was the misdemeanour? I'm thinking it wasnt grammar, spelling, syntax or punctuation, 'cause otherwise your pic would show you in an orange jumpsuit as a repeat offender.

There are strict liability offences - drunken driving for instance here, where the offence is in the act regardless of the intent. Was it something like this that you fell foul of?

E



Real0ne -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:22:54 PM)


here ya go!  LIve from Austin, home of the kick ass!

Have a little chat with Randy.  M TH and Friday....  He enjoys taking them down a notch or 3.

http://ruleoflawradio.com/

let us know what he says :)

Or post the show :)





Brain -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:31:25 PM)

They don't actually tell people that my understanding is from my own experience police are allowed to tell a lie if the purpose is to establish the truth. For instance, after an automobile accident the officer said I was speeding and wasn't wearing my seat belt. That wasn't true so I went to court and objected to those assertions. I won that case but if I had not objected the statements by the police officer would be deemed to be the truth because I didn't say otherwise. Sold this is an example where it's ‘appropriate’ for a police officer to lie in order to get to the truth.
 I'm not sure I like this approach to getting to the bottom of things but I realize it's not a perfect world and I will give people the benefit of the doubt everyone is doing the best they can.



LadyEllen -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:42:49 PM)

aw Sucky, youre not going to tell us what you did that was so naughty?

Class 3 misdemeanour - am I getting closer or do I have to pull your file?

E



Real0ne -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:48:40 PM)



Yep and if he was slick the officer would have been fired for arresting him and you would have his hazzard bond in your checking account or a nice payoff from their insurance company.

Once they stop you that is an arrest, cuffing you unless you hurt someone is kidnapping.

Signing that bond?  Well its making them lots of money right now on wally street by the time its hypothecated close to a hundred times....

nice racket they have there and the real kick in the ass is that these courts have no "real" jurisdiction over the people.  you can look that up when they were established in the congressional record.

People need to understand that.  (just like the governemnt)

Gottta love the internet.

Some of us anyway :)





thornhappy -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:53:38 PM)

I've been stopped by police twice (CHP, San Jose city) and neither were arrests.



LadyEllen -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 8:56:48 PM)

I once knew this sub woman who was nabbed by the fuzz, but she didnt come quietly at all.

E



Real0ne -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 9:04:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I've been stopped by police twice (CHP, San Jose city) and neither were arrests.


you know you people really need to understand something here.

when I say things like that I am quoting the definitions of law dictionaries and often times case citations not your pocket webster.






slvemike4u -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 9:40:07 PM)

Is there a charge for such advice?



thornhappy -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 9:44:22 PM)

Then why don't I have an arrest record, or is that something else.



Real0ne -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 9:47:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Is there a charge for such advice?


no but it might save you money some day. 

The last cop that tried to "arrest" me no longer works there.

American can be free if they want to be free




mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 9:47:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willingtosuck

3/17/201
When I was arrested on 5/19/2009 and taken to the Jones County Texas jail, the next morning when the “Judge” as he was called came to set my bond. So I could get out. This Judge was the justice of the peace he is crippled and uses crutches to walk. He has in fact married me once so I recognized him for his position. The deputy that arrested me lied to me to get me to come out of the house and again a Jones County official would lie to me the judge said you can’t get a jury trial on a mistomener crime!! The Lawyers I spoke with both said this was a lie. HOW can our president either one Bush or Obama say we have rule of law when the judges and cops lie???



Welcome to America where you're free to get screwed just like the rest of us.



Real0ne -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 9:49:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Then why don't I have an arrest record, or is that something else.


its all a matter of application.

They will tell you that they "detained" you. 

Welcome to government synonyms to hide the real deal.

Welcome to the desert of the real Neo.





popeye1250 -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 11:04:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Too easy.....way too easy.I'm going to pass....


Carefull Mike! His name *is* "willing to suck!"



Real0ne -> RE: rule of law (3/17/2010 11:46:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Is there a charge for such advice?


no but it might save you money some day. 

The last cop that tried to "arrest" me no longer works there.

American can be free if they want to be free




oh, just to be perfectly clear as on and for the record; I never give out legal "advice".  Only educational information that is not to be construed as legal advice.



slvemike4u -> RE: rule of law (3/18/2010 12:12:42 AM)

I don't think you need have any worry on that score Real....anyone seeing your shit as legal advice is probably already locked up...in a fucking mental wing!



Real0ne -> RE: rule of law (3/18/2010 12:28:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I don't think you need have any worry on that score Real....anyone seeing your shit as legal advice is probably already locked up...in a fucking mental wing!


pretty please with beer on top be a fucking cop and try to arrest me for a traffic or some bullshit civil violation. 

You have no idea how I love demonstrating these maxims of law.  Only with you I would give you the special deal and take every thing you own or ever will own as well rather than just pissing off the department.








alhamdullilah -> RE: rule of law (3/18/2010 12:59:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willingtosuck

he is crippled and uses crutches to walk. He has in fact married me once so I recognized him for his position. The deputy that arrested me lied to me to get me to come


I am totally confused, I'm sorry. Okay, so you were once married to a "Judge", as you put it, who had the audacity of being "crippled"... I'm not sure if he was a Dom, based on the way it reads, but then there's also a deputy involved. Some sort of threesome?

I'm teasing. I think I grasp your intent. I did wonder what the relevance to the story might have been that the Judge required crutches. Anyway, I think the crux of the story was that you got screwed, yes??

There's a lot of detail in your anecdote but it seems far more relevant to me to share what you were doing that might have played into the whole -affair, if you will, more so anyway than the disability of the Judge. I guess your point would be that it shouldn't. God forbid matters should balance out in the other direction and the rule of law always prevail. See, personally, that just scares me more.



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875