willbeurdaddy -> RE: Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16 (3/18/2010 1:24:32 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 As usual leave it to Sanity to grab a snippet and pretend that it is something it's not. First this is an argument between the State of Washington and Walgreens. You could have used that in the topic but it would not have the desired effect you wished. Your defense will be, "But I only used the headline form the article". Being in a Seattle paper that headline was meant for people in Washington. Second form personal experience if you want a prescription filled that your reaching in your own pocket and paying for, one of the last places I would want to go is Walgreens. As stated by eyesopened above, Walgreens has huge profits. this is about trying to protect those profits not losing money. If it were really about losing money they would cut all of the medicaid patients and happily let them go somewhere else. I guess you missed this part of the article, "The amount private insurers and Medicaid pay pharmacies for prescriptions isn't the actual cost of those drugs but rather is based on what's called the drug's estimated average wholesale price. But that figure is more like the sticker price on a car than its actual wholesale cost." Then there was this part, "The average wholesale price is calculated by a private company, which was accused in a Massachusetts lawsuit of fraudulently inflating its figures. The company did not admit wrongdoing but agreed in a court settlement to ratchet its figures down by about 4 percent." This is about protecting that huge profit and attempting to stop this before other states and/or private groups follow suit. It doesnt matter how AWP is calculated, whatever Walgreens is getting reimbursed makes it unprofitable. Youre obfuscating a very simple issue, and its not only Washington state that is facing losing providers.
|
|
|
|