|
CarrieO -> RE: the Dominance of Clothing (3/19/2010 7:20:06 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Smutmonger
I always looked at a naked Top as being a switch in profiles. Or some sort of net wanker-Females included.
Don't know about the switch theory, but then I'm a switch and I don't feel a need to post nude pics. I think it might have more to do with virility at least on the man's part. I do agree it goes both ways...male and female.
I've been looking through profiles...dom/me, sub, slave, switch...and I'm always surprised by how people chooses to present themselves. I came across one that was listed as a domme and the photo she posted was of her kneeling and showing pretty much nothing but her nude ass. I couldn't take a thing written in her profile serious because all I could think of was her as an ass.
When I first started exploring WIITWD, I met up with a dominant man who rarely wore black clothing. In fact, on our first date, he wore a handknit multicolored sweater and jeans. I remember that sweater, his smile and the way he engaged everyone around him, me included. He told me later that night the reason he wore it was to gauge my reaction and to let me know it wasn't the black leather boots/pants/vest that was dominant...he could even make me associate a tacky handknit multicolored sweater with an image of dominance.
I still say, in all seriousness, presentation is everything. If you want to be known as an ass...present yourself as an ass. If you want to be known as a dick...post photos of your dangly bits. If you want to be known as a person...present yourself as a human. Sometimes that means NOT posting a photo in order to make better use of your words.
|
|
|
|
