AquaticSub -> RE: no bra, no panties ! (3/23/2010 11:12:54 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lucylucy I don't understand what the big deal is about being asked to not wear a bra or panties. If you're going on a date with a man, it means you're interested or at least curious. He's interested or at least curious. It's not like a business meeting, it's a date, for crying out loud. What's wrong with being a little sexy? What's "red flaggy" about a dominant man being a little dominant on a first date and a submissive woman being a little submissive on a first date? There isn't anything wrong with it. The issue is receiving orders from someone who doesn't own me yet and who I haven't even seen face-to-face. I'd have the same issue if he ordered me to wear a specific color t-shirt. Personally, I usually try to look a little sexy on dates. Actually, I usually try to look sexy just about every day. I love looking sexy. At the same time... What's wrong with him seeing what my idea of dressing sexy is since he doesn't own me yet? What's wrong with showing him who I am and my sense of style, which is fairly unique, so that he knows what he is getting if we continue? quote:
With the exception of those who are very well-endowed on top, how could not wearing a bra or panties be dangerous or harmful? By skipping underwear, I don't forfeit my responsibility to say no to anything that is dangerous or illegal. If he takes my not wearing underwear as evidence that I will do anything he wants, well, he has the right to think that, and he may be wrong, and he has the right to be wrong, just as if I show up without underwear and get the creeps when I meet him, I have the right to cut the date short and take my pantyless cunt home and masturbate. No harm, no foul. I agree it's not dangerous. I do think it can be friggin' rude though. I have some skirts and dresses where, when I sit, the only thing keeping my vulva from touching the chair are my panties. The nice folks at Starbucks don't need to clean up after me that much... For me, Aqua, I frequently skip panties cause I don't particularly enjoy wearing them. I don't really get what is so sexy about not wearing them. I know it arouses some guys so, even if I don't get it, when I'm involved with one I make some teases about it. But again, they aren't giving orders before they have a right to. I do think that if I show up, having allowed them to control my underwear, that the chance is good I'm sending a definate signal. While a self-confessed slut, I still don't allow people who don't have access to the goods to control my underwear. For me and mine, it would be extremely strange to submit to demands from someone who doesn't own me regarding my underwear if I'm not going to let them check things out. quote:
A first date isn't a first contact. I'm assuming there would be a connection of some sort to warrant the date. Perhaps there is the difference in approach. We don't spend a lot of time chatting - Val and I want to meet people fairly quickly. I have no interest whatsoever in getting attached to a person over the phone and Internet before meeting them face-to-face and finding out what chemistry we have. I've been emotionally burned that way several times before. Whatever experience others may have with this, it's entirely possible for me to feel a definate connection on the phone or on the net and have nothing when it comes to the face-to-face.
|
|
|
|