RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 7:20:54 PM

servantforuse

Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline

So why do we need so many new IRS employees ? It must just be part of the stimulus plan ?

(in reply to slvemike4u)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 7:22:52 PM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

So why do we need so many new IRS employees ? It must just be part of the stimulus plan ?

to count the money. bean counters.

(in reply to servantforuse)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 7:53:19 PM

thornhappy

Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline

I don't see where they'd need anything other than the billing codes.

You keep this stuff off Google the same way corporations do - firewalls, VPNs, etc. You can't Google my work documents.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

If the governments paying the bills whats to keep government officials at various levels from seeing the records. Same with the insurance companies, which already have access. They make you sign a waiver these days, if you're not paying privately, allowing your records to be shared.

I have a feeling that (judging by the way government always works) with the expanding powers of the Federal Government over our health care that those who feel they need to know will form into an ever growing circle.

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

And you didn't read what I wrote. Yes searchable BY DOCTORS AND OTHER MEDICAL STAFF. It doesn't mean out on the net it means in hospitals accessable by those who have the program and a password. Medical records cannot be put on the internet, it violates doctor/patient confidentiality. Geez Sanity I thought you had more common sense than that!

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 7:56:04 PM

jlf1961

Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

I have an idea...

We put bar codes on every man, woman and child in the US and everytime someone gets a scan their complete medical, financial and political record comes up for examination.

this ought to make pahunk and realone happy

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to thornhappy)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:04:56 PM

rulemylife

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

If the governments paying the bills whats to keep government officials at various levels from seeing the records. Same with the insurance companies, which already have access. They make you sign a waiver these days, if you're not paying privately, allowing your records to be shared.

I have a feeling that (judging by the way government always works) with the expanding powers of the Federal Government over our health care that those who feel they need to know will form into an ever growing circle.

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

And you didn't read what I wrote. Yes searchable BY DOCTORS AND OTHER MEDICAL STAFF. It doesn't mean out on the net it means in hospitals accessable by those who have the program and a password. Medical records cannot be put on the internet, it violates doctor/patient confidentiality. Geez Sanity I thought you had more common sense than that!

That's exactly the problem, "I have a feeling".

Too much of this health care debate has been about unsubstantiated things people believe might happen.

< Message edited by rulemylife -- 3/24/2010 8:06:14 PM >

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:09:38 PM

rulemylife

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

It is very clear. The federal government via the IRS will now have access to everyones health care records.

Then show us that Servant.

As in facts, documentation, citations to prove what you are saying.

Or is this another something Rush whispered in your ear?

(in reply to servantforuse)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:19:55 PM

slvemike4u

Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

"..facts,documentation.citations..." are you fucking kidding me RML...how dare you ask him for something as trivial as that stuff.What are you...a socialist?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4

(in reply to rulemylife)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:20:05 PM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I have an idea...

We put bar codes on every man, woman and child in the US and everytime someone gets a scan their complete medical, financial and political record comes up for examination.

this ought to make pahunk and realone happy

a chip.

rfid.

and if you criticize the government- they simply turn off your chip.

we are much closer to that then you realize.

I hope I am dead when it is fully in effect.

(in reply to jlf1961)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:32:51 PM

Thadius

Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

It is very clear. The federal government via the IRS will now have access to everyones health care records.

Then show us that Servant.

As in facts, documentation, citations to prove what you are saying.

Or is this another something Rush whispered in your ear?

I usually don't do requests but this one is a special case.

IRC sec. 6055(b)(2), as added by H.R. 3590, sec. 1502(a).

Psst... but don't worry we are all just paranoid fringe elements.

_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to rulemylife)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:33:56 PM

slvemike4u

Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

Well some of you have good reason to be....

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4

(in reply to Thadius)

Profile

Post #: 30

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:43:08 PM

CountrySong

Posts: 554
Joined: 1/25/2008
Status: offline

Let's all watch the movie Gattaca tonight to ease our minds about the goverment and our medical records.

_____________________________

Cowboy clown and cowboy poet!
Jouster of windmills.
Knight in tarnished armor.
Rescuer of damsels who don't want to be rescued.
Dreamer of Impossible Dreams

(in reply to slvemike4u)

Profile

Post #: 31

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 8:45:56 PM

Thadius

Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CountrySong

Let's all watch the movie Gattaca tonight to ease our minds about the goverment and our medical records.

Funny I was just debating whether to watch that or 1984...

Good night all.

_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to CountrySong)

Profile

Post #: 32

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 9:00:56 PM

domiguy

Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Do you think that it is just a coinsidence that the IRS is hiring 16,500 new agents as this bill is being signed ? Part of this bill is to force everyone to buy insurance, ( or be fined ) . The federal government will now have access to your insurance records and medical records. That is what this is all about..Read Popeye's thread.." now this is scary".. He is a senior democrat and this is their mindset..

It is scary that you actually read one of popeye's threads. What is wrong with you?

< Message edited by domiguy -- 3/24/2010 9:01:17 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to servantforuse)

Profile

Post #: 33

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 9:03:35 PM

slvemike4u

Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

Start a thread Domi...a subject that involved would of necessity need its own thread.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4

(in reply to domiguy)

Profile

Post #: 34

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 9:05:59 PM

domiguy

Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

It would be horrible if all of our medical records were available at the touch of a key....Think of the lives that might be saved!!!

_____________________________

(in reply to domiguy)

Profile

Post #: 35

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 9:18:51 PM

rulemylife

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

It is very clear. The federal government via the IRS will now have access to everyones health care records.

Then show us that Servant.

As in facts, documentation, citations to prove what you are saying.

Or is this another something Rush whispered in your ear?

I usually don't do requests but this one is a special case.

IRC sec. 6055(b)(2), as added by H.R. 3590, sec. 1502(a).

Psst... but don't worry we are all just paranoid fringe elements.

Where exactly does this say the IRS or any other government agency has access to your health records?

The only thing this does is give a mandate to the IRS to monitor and enforce the health insurance requirement.

(in reply to Thadius)

Profile

Post #: 36

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 9:34:04 PM

cloudboy

Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

Gosh, the WSJ is right. With just a basic internet search, I just found out that Domiguy's family doctor measured his endowment at 12" .

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 37

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 9:46:09 PM

slvemike4u

Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

That's not a Doctor I would trust...he obviously has vision problems....and it would follow dosing issues.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4

(in reply to cloudboy)

Profile

Post #: 38

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 9:58:31 PM

domiguy

Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Gosh, the WSJ is right. With just a basic internet search, I just found out that Domiguy's family doctor measured his endowment at 12" .

It's funny what a few dollars will do to embellish one's health, length and girth.

You know I spent top dollar on that doctor. How could he have left out the info about my girth?

_____________________________

(in reply to cloudboy)

Profile

Post #: 39

RE: WSJ: Your Medical Records Aren't Secure - 3/24/2010 10:49:21 PM

brainiacsub

Posts: 1209
Joined: 11/11/2007
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Gosh, the WSJ is right. With just a basic internet search, I just found out that Domiguy's family doctor measured his endowment at 12" .

No, dear, that was his IQ.

(in reply to cloudboy)

Profile

Post #: 40