Thadius
Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML You make some good points, Thadius. Much to do with a separated culture here and a 100 year religious war in Europe. Or was it 30 years? I always get them confused. But in fact the Colonies did have state religions and rebellions against them such as that lead by Anne Hutchinson Additionally and importantly to the OP, we have had at least four major Evangelical or revivalist movements in our two hundred plus years of history, arising I think out of the rural regions of the South and West, which have had lasting impact. I suppose it is a chicken/egg question whether the revivals influenced our national character or vice versa. Many of our Presidents came from the South and the West (Ohio was once considered "west") and there has been a long tradition of Preacher influence in Washington along with prayer breakfasts and a national cathedral. The wall of separation has not been very sturdy I don't think, for good or ill. Thanks for the catching that writing error, what I meant by state run is national government run (i.e. Church of Englund). Indeed there were states that had official religions, and even continued to have them even after the ratification of the Constitution. For many years the Capitol housed the largest worship services and biggest congregation in the nation. It is mainly after the SCOTUS changed the freedom of religion clauses to mean "seperation of church and state", that we get into a wierd area of determining what constitutes state sponsorship and endorsement of religion. I still contend that the language in the Constitution was to keep Congress from creating and funding a national religion, and to keep them from interfering with the religious practices of the various states, municipalities, and individuals. I mean the language is fairly clear "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." I further find it funny that the same people that would argue for this language to mean "seperation of church and state", try to use the word militia in a modern literal sense to go after the 2nd Ammendment. I surely believe that atheists, agnostics, monotheists, and polytheists can coexist peacefully in this nation, the key to it is to stop worrying about converting the others, and to stop trying to prevent the others from expressing their views. I say that as a practicing pastor of a church, it is not my job to convert anybody, it is my job to plant a couple of seeds here and there. If they are meant to grow they will, if not nobody got hurt in the process. I approach most topics in the same way, if I can instill a bit of curiousity about a topic and somebody goes and researches it themselves, I feel like I have accomplished something, even if they come away from it with a different opinion than mine. Sorry for the slight derail, but I believe it is topical. I wish you well, Thadius
_____________________________
When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
|