Halcyone -> RE: Are piercings/tattoos desirable? (4/5/2006 5:10:39 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Evanesce By this logic, then, should this relationship end for whatever reason, you would have his mark of ownership removed? I'm just trying to understand here, because it makes no sense to me. It is a little more difficult to remove a tattoo than it is to remove a wedding ring or a collar. I can't tuck it away in a drawer or a box, although it is all but hidden from me without some serious squirming and a mirror. [;)] Were the relationship to end, the tattoo would remain as a reminder, a memory, of what we shared. However, if I were to enter another relationship as slave (and I wouldn't but we're still dealing in hypotheticals here [:)]), I would understand if my new owner wanted to add his own twist to the mark of ownership on my body, thereby claiming me as his own. There is no erasing it or removing it. There is adding to it and marking the beginning of a new chapter of my history. It's the intent and symbolism behind the tattoo that is at issue. I can only wear one mark of ownership. The tattoo on my back is that mark. It is his mark and it is his right, as owner, to make any other's mark his mark as well, because I am his. That last one is a painful sentence to make sense of, I know, and I apologize. I'm not sure what else I can say to describe how we view the concept of ownership marks. Just so it's known, Sir quite enjoys the other tattoo that I have, the one I had inked long before I met him. It was something I had done for myself and he likes that, perhaps even more than he likes the way it looks (it could stand to be touched up!). quote:
ORIGINAL: fastlane my slave will be marked by me....if nothing less then my teeth marks impressioned upon her cheeks....as I pray for lockjaw! Kevin Oh no, a biter! [:D]
|
|
|
|