Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Science and Morality


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Science and Morality Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Science and Morality - 4/1/2010 4:37:49 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I think the problem was not only that he only spent a few seconds on the Western aspect, and when he said that the Taliban knew no more about human well being than about nuclear physics, he didn't mention the West as well.


See, I was looking at the heart of his message that no one was really perfect and I wasn't keeping score that way. But that said, when he said the following, he had a picture of the pope in the middle:

quote:

Now, the irony, from my perspective is that the only people who seem to generally agree with me and who think that there are right and wrong answers to moral questions are religious demagogues of one form or another.

And of course they think they have right answers to moral questions because they got these answers from a voice in a whirlwind, not because they made an intelligent analysis of the causes and condition of human and animal well-being.


Also, one of his first comparisons of moral authority was between the Dalai Lama and Ted Bundy, not the Taliban.

One possible explanation is that Sam Harris is trying to reach the American masses. By slowly introducing ideas that all sides have to work on things, he might have more success than coming right out and saying Bush & Cheney are war criminals. Then again, he might be aware of his slight bias. Who knows.


quote:

The biggest issue I have with the idea that there is any objective standard of well being is that there's really no 'typical' person. That thread I linked you to in CMail shows that pretty clearly - the situation in which one person would thrive another would suffer in, and saying 'you can choose to do whatever you want' completely ignores the social and cultural aspect - the damage done by following your true nature, and being ostracized for it. Harris says he believes that it should be a womans' choice to wear "a veil or a funny hat or whatever" but the fact that he even compares it to a "funny hat" means that he is implicitly devaluing her choice.


On this, we agree.

- LA





_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Science and Morality - 4/1/2010 4:49:04 PM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Silence8

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika

I'll tell you honestly, I've seen quite a few young women here wear the hijab, al-amira or shayla style and be quite flirty with it. I used to go to middle eastern shisha bars and see the girls who didn't have to wear the head scarfs chose to wear it sometimes as a form of play, like denial. My ex used to say it looked like a French headscarf and could be seductive... as always, YMMV.



I was thinking of mentioning something to this effect, that, if we really want to understand this culture, we need to understand their point of view. And it's true that creating a mystery out of the female sex only heightens the attraction. S/M, after all, probably feeds off some of the same motivations as in a lesser developed physics-ignorant culture. [I always forget how to make that smiley face that smirks.]


I can't say that I completely understand the point of view because I've never been immersed in an Islamic society. Everything that I know, I know from having an ex-partner and many friends who grew up and chose to leave such societies for opportunities here in the West. Most of them, including my ex, are secular today.

That said, I am a curious person and have asked many questions. I've learned some very interesting things about the inner workings of the various cultures in countries where Islam is present (don't assume that Morocco, Lebanon, UAE, Malaysia and Pakistan, Iran, etc are similar cultures simply because they have a majority Islamic population).

I do know that the average Westerner is misinterpreting a lot of the cues from the Islamic world. They are looking at it from a Western perspective only and are unable to put themselves in the shoes of the other. Elisabella provided an excellent example here.

- LA



_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to Silence8)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Science and Morality - 4/2/2010 1:45:22 AM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Respect for the beliefs of others is routinely touted as a good thing. But the consequences of this view are far from satisfying when those beliefs include "honor killings" and other excesses. A reasonable person senses that there has to be a line somewhere.

In this TED talk, Sam Harris suggests how to define that line.

It's often said that science cannot give us a foundation for morality and human values because science deals with facts, and facts and values seem to belong to different spheres. It's often thought that there's no description of the way the world is that can tell us how the world ought to be. But I think this is quite clearly untrue. Values are a certain kind of fact. They are facts about the well-being of conscious creatures.

Enjoy and comment.

K.



"That all men are of this mind respecting their own institutions may be inferred from many and various proofs, and among them by the following. Darius having summoned some Greeks under his sway, who were present ,asked them "for what sum they would feed upon the dead bodies of their parents." They answered that they would not do it for any sum .Darius afterward having summoned some of the Indians called Callatians, who are accustomed to eat their parents, asked them, in the presence of the Greeks, and who were informed of what was said by an interpreter, "for what sum they would consent to burn their fathers when they die;" but they making loud exclamations, begged he would speak words of good omen. Such then is the effect of custom and Pindar appears to me to have said rightly. That custom is the king of all men." Herodotus
 
Surely among us there is one who can decide for the rest of us how we should live our lives. (No I thought not)

And if not then we must all decide for ourselves. And then get together and try and agree on enough things that we don't have to kill each other over differences of traditions and belief.

Respect for others beliefs is really a selfish thing because really we are trying to insure that they show us the same for ours.

< Message edited by blacksword404 -- 4/2/2010 1:46:22 AM >


_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Science and Morality - 4/2/2010 3:49:13 PM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Through hindsight I could foresee science giving marching orders to Gestapo-like agents "for the good of the planet" or "the greater good of humanity" that would have no bearing on what spiritual humans with actual hearts would consider true morality.



Under exactly what real-world circumstances does science give "marching orders" to Gestapo-like agents?



Maybe something like these.

From the book "The Lost Civilizations of the Stone Age"
http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Civilizations-Stone-Age/dp/product-description/0684855801

Before dumping the corpse in the sea, he was determined to preserve what he could for science. This sordid act is described in its perpetrator's own account, quoted by Urry:


In thinking of the best way to perform the operation, I discovered, to my chagrin, that I did not have a vessel large enough to contain a whole brain. Expecting the natives to appear every hour, most likely with grave intentions, I gave up, not without regret, the idea of preserving the Polynesian's brain but not the chance to obtain a preparation of the larynx with all the muscles, the tongue, etc., as I had promised my former teacher, Professor H. now living in Strasbourg, the larynx of a dark man with all the muscles. Preparing anatomical instruments and a jug with spirit, I returned to Boy's room and cut out the larynx with the tongue and all the muscles. A bit of skin from the forehead and head with hair went into my collection. Olsson, shaking with his fear of the dead man, was holding a candle and Boy's head. As I was cutting the plexus brachialis, Boy's hand made a small movement and Olsson, mortally afraid that I was cutting a man still alive, dropped the candle, and we were left in darkness.

Such was the callous nature of the operator that whilst sailing out in his boat to dump the corpse of 'Boy', he was so distracted by the marine life that he went into a sort of scientific reverie deep enough for him to temporarily forget that the corpse was on board. Having surreptitiously and successfully thrown 'Boy' overboard, and satisfied that the sharks would do the rest, he returned to shore to relax over a cup of tea.

Or even more sick...

Urry describes what is probably the most savage and appalling example of the immoral actions routinely pursued by civilised medical and scientific institutions on the mortal remains of natives. William Lanney and Truganini, described as the last of the Tasmanian Aborigines, had asked to be buried in peace when their time came. In 1869 Lanney died, and despite his wishes his corpse became the property of scientists. Urry gives an account of what took place next:


In the morgue the body was viciously mutilated: the head, hands and feet removed and only the torso and limbs were left to bury. However, on the same night as the interment, two groups planned to exhume even these remains. Discovering their rivals had beaten them to the body, the leader of the other group smashed down the door to the morgue where the remains had been removed, only to discover 'a few particles of flesh' remained.

This pack of wild scientific dogs each carried off a piece of the corpse; one took an ear, another the nose, yet another a part of an arm, and the greatest prize of all -- the head -- was never seen again. A particularly sinister postscript to the story consists of the making of a tobacco pouch out of Lanney's skin by Dr Stockwell, who was the Chief House Surgeon of the Colonial Hospital as well as a distinguished member of the Royal Society of Tasmania. It is impossible not to make parallels between this particular act and the hawking of combs made from Apache bones in the Wild West, as well as more recent examples, such as the making of lampshades from the skin of Jews under the Nazi regime. Truganini died in 1876 and was duly buried. But her skeleton was later dug up so that it could be displayed in the museum of the Royal Society of Tasmania. One can imagine Dr Stockwell admiring her skeleton whilst puffing away on his pipe with tobacco drawn from the pouch made from her countryman's skin. Finally in 1976 descendants of the Aboriginal Tasmanians regained control over her remains, which were then cremated and her ashes given up to the sea.

 People's reasons for doing things like this have been and continue to be with humanity. Meaning at any time or place the might be repeated. Such men as these might give gestapo-like orders. People who think like this continue to pop up.

< Message edited by blacksword404 -- 4/2/2010 4:29:02 PM >


_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Science and Morality - 4/3/2010 9:11:34 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
Human beings have such a powerful need to feel good about themselves that they will routinely advance some "good" as a justification for their acts of disrespect, cruelty, and mayhem. But this is doomed to the same failure that besets all of the ego's attempts at perfection. Sometimes we are not good. And when we rationalize our actions to suppress the feeling that they are wrong because we perceive them to be necessary, we lead ourselves to believe in all manner of heartless notions of "good" (in particular the quaint fantasy of a "higher good") which would not confuse us if we could just accept that sometimes we choose to do things that are fundamentally wrong when we are faced with a choice between two evils (kill one man, or let ten die instead).

K.

(in reply to blacksword404)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Science and Morality - 4/3/2010 9:39:10 PM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Human beings have such a powerful need to feel good about themselves that they will routinely advance some "good" as a justification for their acts of disrespect, cruelty, and mayhem. But this is doomed to the same failure that besets all of the ego's attempts at perfection. Sometimes we are not good. And when we rationalize our actions to suppress the feeling that they are wrong because we perceive them to be necessary, we lead ourselves to believe in all manner of heartless notions of "good" (in particular the quaint fantasy of a "higher good") which would not confuse us if we could just accept that sometimes we choose to do things that are fundamentally wrong when we are faced with a choice between two evils (kill one man, or let ten die instead).

K.



Sometimes it is just a matter of degrees.

_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Science and Morality - 4/4/2010 7:58:49 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blacksword404

Sometimes it is just a matter of degrees.

Yes, that is true. But choosing the lesser evil, and living with it, is a different proposition from pretending to ourselves that we are being righteous.

K.

(in reply to blacksword404)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Science and Morality - 4/5/2010 3:45:33 AM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Yes, that is true. But choosing the lesser evil, and living with it, is a different proposition from pretending to ourselves that we are being righteous.

K.



I can agree with that.

_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Science and Morality - 4/5/2010 4:03:05 AM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
                                                          We are righteous


Once upon a time there were 3 kingdoms that were in talks between the three of them. They wished to come to an agreement between the three, so as to strengthen themselves from other kingdoms in the world. Now neither of the three were either particularly strong or particularly weak. These three are by no means really friends. But the three are closer to each other than to any other kingdom in the world. The first kingdom is the kingdom of Castus. The second the kingdom of Pudicus. And the third being the kingdom of Frugi. Pudicus, Castus and Frugi are lands adjoining each other.

Now these three have been in negotiations to cement an alliance ever since Pudicus was attacked by a grouping of rival kingdoms trying to gain territory. And quite frankly these rival kingdoms had way too many young unmarried men. Perhaps it was inevitable that somebody was getting invaded. Now the way it happened, was good because Pudicus is the strongest of the three. With Castus the second strongest and Frugi last. By the path the invaders were taking, after they had dispensed with Pudicus, Castus would have been next in line. This would have left Castus with only Frugi to lend a hand. And if Pudicus was defeated it would only be a matter of time before the other two fell. So Castus and Frugi came to the aid of Pudicus. And together they sent the invaders home in defeat.

Now after this victory the three kings decided that maybe they should ally together in case there was a repeat of this attack again. This would lead to a good amount of trade between the three, helping all involved. But the three had a problem with customs and traditions. Each thought some of the others customs were barbaric and evil. Castus had a tradition of taking "beloveds". In the way of the ancient Greek custom of "lovers and beloveds". Now Pudicus and Frugi took exception to this practice. Now the other two were not without their own questionable practices. Frugi had a custom of eating it's dead children. Why, we don't know. There are way to many versions to this tradition and none can be verified. Pudicus likes to abort it's children when they deem it necessary. Which could sometimes means a man's wife was accidentally impregnated. Strangely by some other guy. Or a little petting goes to far and oops. Sometimes it is because of rape or complications with the pregnancy.

Pudicus thinks the whole "beloved" thing is quite nasty and sick and they would kill anyone who did that within their own borders. The same goes with The eating of other humans.

Castus see's no problem with it's practices and doesn't like children being killed. Born or not. And the cannibalism. Well they don't even want to think about that. Either one of these practices in their lands would carry the death penalty.

Frugi finds the practice of killing children and letting the bodies go to waste sacrilege. And thinks harming children is atrocious. And either one in their land will get you killed.

Now each of the three thinks it's customs are right and proper. And they don't think theirs should be the ones to change. And so they have come to an impasse on whose customs are right and how much each should change.

Who is right? Of course we know which two are the evil barbarians don't we?



_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Science and Morality - 4/5/2010 12:23:10 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
The possibly interesting point here is, the purpose of the alliance is mutual security. Without it, they are clearly all at risk. The matter of their differing social customs is a non-issue in that context, and pandering to their need to feel righteous will serve only to accomplish their destruction.

K.

(in reply to blacksword404)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Science and Morality - 4/5/2010 1:27:18 PM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

The possibly interesting point here is, the purpose of the alliance is mutual security. Without it, they are clearly all at risk. The matter of their differing social customs is a non-issue in that context, and pandering to their need to feel righteous will serve only to accomplish their destruction.

K.



Exactly. I mean come on, do you think the Germans and the Japanese had anything in common other than both believing they were superior to the other?

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Science and Morality - 4/5/2010 6:26:43 PM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

The possibly interesting point here is, the purpose of the alliance is mutual security. Without it, they are clearly all at risk. The matter of their differing social customs is a non-issue in that context, and pandering to their need to feel righteous will serve only to accomplish their destruction.

K.



Priorities, priorities. When it comes to some things people are not always rational. Some might choose to take a go at the invaders alone rather than allow the others customs to continue. The best course is for the three to change themselves only the absolute minimal necessary for them to ally together. Above the "stare harshly and hold your nose "line and
below the "these bastards must die line."

Either we learn to live together in harmony, or we die together as fools. Martin Luther King Jr

_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 72
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Science and Morality Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078