Hannity calls tea partiers what? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DomKen -> Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 1:09:19 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFcZbHuo9wI

Last 20 seconds or so of the clip. sorry couldn't find a shorter clip anywhere that wouldn't be attacked by teh righties.




jlf1961 -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 2:39:20 PM)

Ken, there is only one problem, according to some on these boards, Tim McVeigh was a patsy...




pahunkboy -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 2:58:10 PM)

LOL.


Oh man.

Im leaving. LOL.




DomKen -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 3:58:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Ken, there is only one problem, according to some on these boards, Tim McVeigh was a patsy...

I could care less what those idoits think.

What I'm curious about is how people feel about watching a crowd at the Reagan Library cheer when told they were all wannabe terrorists.




Thadius -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 4:40:45 PM)

Just got done watching the clip. In my opinion it sounded like sarcasm, or a play on the labeling of right wing protesters as terrorist over the last couple weeks.

Who knows?




DomKen -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 5:04:56 PM)

No change of tone or inflection indicates that either everything Hannity says is sarcasm, possible but if so that's a whole other discussion, or that he was not being sarcastic at that moment.

Of course it is funny to see Thadius defending it. He'd be one of the first calling for a liberal's head if a discussion that was 8 minutes of baching GWB ended with the liberal commentator telling an audience at the Carter Library they were all wannabe Bill Ayers.

Right wing hypocrisy at its finest.




Thadius -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 5:10:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

No change of tone or inflection indicates that either everything Hannity says is sarcasm, possible but if so that's a whole other discussion, or that he was not being sarcastic at that moment.

Of course it is funny to see Thadius defending it. He'd be one of the first calling for a liberal's head if a discussion that was 8 minutes of baching GWB ended with the liberal commentator telling an audience at the Carter Library they were all wannabe Bill Ayers.

Right wing hypocrisy at its finest.

Wasn't defending it or defaming it. You asked for an opinion, I gave mine on what I saw and heard. I could very well be wrong and the folks behind him could be right wing lemmings that would cheer for anything that sounded different than the norm.

Hence the who knows at the end of my post. I appreciate you taking such interest in my viewing habits and now my thoughts and motives. Hell pretty soon you will be inquiring what kind of sheets I have on my bed.

Left wing elitism at its best.




urineme -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 5:22:23 PM)

Given that the current administration sees ANYONE who disagrees with it's agenda as a "Terrorist", while absolutely FAILING to prevent an attempt thereat, (Thanks, Dutch passenger), being called a "Terrorist" by the current administration is somewhat a badge of honor for vocal dissent, in accordance with the constitutional rights that allow and protect such activities. I may not agree with any particulat voice of dissent, but, having spent 20 years in the Navy in defense OF the right TO dissent, I say let them rant on!




DomKen -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 5:24:51 PM)

Poor baby doesn't like his past sins being used against him. Well I warned you quite clearly back in the run up to the 2008 election that your guilt by association crap was going to bite you on the ass. You kept shoveling it back then so now its time to eat some crow and perhaps mature just a tiny bit.




Thadius -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 5:32:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Poor baby doesn't like his past sins being used against him. Well I warned you quite clearly back in the run up to the 2008 election that your guilt by association crap was going to bite you on the ass. You kept shoveling it back then so now its time to eat some crow and perhaps mature just a tiny bit.

What tangent are you going off on?

Glad that you feel somehow vindicated...[8|]




Raiikun -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 6:05:20 PM)

Yeah, listening to it in context, it's very obviously sarcasm. I can't imagine how anyone would not see it. (Not a Hannity fan either; I despise him and don't think I agree with the point he was even making there at the end, but I can tell sarcasm when I see it.)




Raiikun -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 6:07:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Of course it is funny to see Thadius defending it.


Defending it? As he put it, he stated his opinion that it was sarcasm, nothing more.

I think your hostile attack and quickness to invent hypocrisy there is more telling about you than about Thad.




DomKen -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 7:18:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Poor baby doesn't like his past sins being used against him. Well I warned you quite clearly back in the run up to the 2008 election that your guilt by association crap was going to bite you on the ass. You kept shoveling it back then so now its time to eat some crow and perhaps mature just a tiny bit.

What tangent are you going off on?

Glad that you feel somehow vindicated...[8|]

No tangent. Just reminding you that you felt perfectly comfortable tarring leftists simply by who they had sat in a room with a couple of times. So now that your side is proudly proclaiming themselves to be terrorists I'm enjoying your squeals.




Brain -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 7:42:49 PM)

It must be because I’m a little slow. When you guys say it's sarcastic in what way do you mean?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Of course it is funny to see Thadius defending it.


Defending it? As he put it, he stated his opinion that it was sarcasm, nothing more.

I think your hostile attack and quickness to invent hypocrisy there is more telling about you than about Thad.




Arpig -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 7:46:49 PM)

Tempest in a teapot.




Sanity -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 7:47:05 PM)


He was poking fun at the Liberal talking heads on CNN, etc. who are ranting on and on about how anyone who disagrees with Obama have to be terroristic militia members.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

It must be because I’m a little slow. When you guys say it's sarcastic in what way do you mean?




thornhappy -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 7:55:35 PM)

Do you ever move off that line?




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 8:00:55 PM)

Don't forget that Homeland Security issued a report last year that basically said anyone who believes in secure borders, limited Immigration, limited fed gov., limited spending, is anti abortion and who believes in and respects the Constitution as the founders intended are potential terrorists. Heck that's about 80% of the country, since only 21% admit to being liberals. On top of that, most people who consider themselves a liberal socially, are still conservative when it comes to out of control federal government invading our lives and sucking us dry with taxes, and now backdoor taxes these days.

It's funny how Homeland Security never tells you that more Americans have been killed by Illegal aliens through drunk driving and criminal activities than in the entire Iraq War. Then if you want to really boggle the mind, add in all the people who's lives have been destroyed by the drugs that are routinely brought in through Mexico. There's no telling how many suicides and overdoses have occurred from being hooked on drugs. Patriots are not the enemy. Brain damaged liberals and RINO's are.

Homeland Security is just plain nutts, but all you have to do is look at Janet Napolitano's head, and you can tell she has some mongoloidism running in her family. It's amazing how the power of politically correct speech has brainwashed so many people. You would have thought they would have learned from that first homeland security report.

http://protectourborder.net/slideshow.html





TheHeretic -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 8:10:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

No change of tone or inflection indicates that either everything Hannity says is sarcasm, possible but if so that's a whole other discussion, or that he was not being sarcastic at that moment.




You don't have a sense of humor, Ken, so I'm afraid your opinion on his tone, inflection, and intent isn't worth very much.




Brain -> RE: Hannity calls tea partiers what? (4/1/2010 8:24:13 PM)

I watch CNN enough to know that simply isn't true. He's making it up.  If that's the case no wonder I didn't understand the "sarcasm".

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


He was poking fun at the Liberal talking heads on CNN, etc. who are ranting on and on about how anyone who disagrees with Obama have to be terroristic militia members.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

It must be because I’m a little slow. When you guys say it's sarcastic in what way do you mean?





Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125