Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
"Take what, their money and power elsewhere? Please explain. " Pretty much. While I maintain that these people are smarter than your average bear, they are not flawless in their thinking. If there is a place for them to go after TSHTF or not isn't the point at this time, the point is that they think there is. They think that their money can insulate them from just about anything. They were taught like I was that money is the root,,,,,,, of everything. "You write in past tense. Did you realize the error of your ways, then change? Or...? " Absolutely. Of course there was the eventual realization that if I kept it up I would wind up dead. I remember doing some nasty thing and was asked "So you think you are just going to get away with this ?" to which I replied "Damn right". It took me too long to get my head out of that space. Without the money and connections it would've happened alot sooner. I felt untouchable and immortal. I now see that as a trap. "I suspect that people are unnaturally tense and under loads of stress/pressure to have a need to regularly blow off steam in non-productive and unhealthy ways" I think it only one coping method. After a really stressful day any dude can choose among many options. Beat his olady, go to the bar, possibly get into a fight there. Others may get horny, want to burn one or be happy with a couple of beers and a good meal. Others seem to take it out on other drivers on the road. I remember reading about "free floating anger" and I can't believe that people have such disregard for the lives of others and get so pissed off just because someone passes them. They just have to vent somewhere and rather than taking it out on their family and friends they derive enough satisfaction from "winning" on the highway to quell their ire. That is but one example. I learned how to deal with anger in a totally different way, which is simply not to deal with it at all. By that I mean you can get aggravated by people or circumstance, but the anger is a choice. The aggravation is a seed, just don't water it. I have something I call AQ. Aggravation Quotient, somewhat like IQ. See those seeds can add up sometimes and there are times at work I've said "I'm leaving early, my AQ is through the roof". With aggravation, it seems to subside on it's own once you remove yourself from the source. Anger is a trap, and some find it very difficult to extricate themselves. "Is the government intentionally inept, so as to further their agenda of keeping us divided, and therefore conquered? Or are they genuine bumblefucks who simply overcompensated too soon, for decades of prior wrongs, producing an unintended result of further alienating those who were forced to accept change? " That goes back to my idea of how things really work. Did you ever think about just who chooses the candidates ? Sure some public numbers are used, but there is an entity pulling the strings so to speak. Call me a conspiracy theorist if you like but actions speak louder than words. Again they have a different thought process than we. I can't really say if the ineptitude is a show designed to hide their malicious intent or if they are chosen from among the actually inept because such people are easier to control. Bush couldn't run a real business to save his life. Obama got involved in humanitarian projects but did HE fund them or simply spend other peoples' money ? And - did either one of them write their own speeches ? It may be a combination of the two. Lobbyists et alii may be maintaining control also by picking those with skeletons in the closet, the door to which will be opened if they get out of line. Show me a rich person who hasn't done something wrong. But then the control might be much simpler for some, akin to buying a kid alot of new toys. Either way is effective of course and I think both dynamics are in play. "Maybe the PTB understood that they couldn't keep a lid on racial discrimination much longer, and didn't want to risk losing control" Possibly. I don't have all the answers but some insight may show if we D.C. Al Fine to the core tenet of divide and conquer. The real PTB see the commoner as an enemy. This is evidenced in law in fact. What would you do with an enemy that outnumbered you a thousandfold at least ? You would do your best to keep them preoccupied with matters other than your actions, and make it appear that you are friendly. And that's all they do, take and take and make themselves look like Mr. Goodie Twoshoes. All day long. Again actions speak louder than words. Everything they do from healthcare to cash for clunkers to incentive checks do no fucking good, but they look good to the sheeple. But as I said these people, as intelligent as they may be are indeed flawed. Most have no concept of a personal budget at all, yet they control our money, and actually just do as they are told. The way I see it the President is controlled by knowledge of the location of the closetfull of skeletons because of his extreme power. Direct bribes, oops, contributions from lobbyists are not so good here. They simply get setup for a kickass retirement and collect later, either in four or eight years. Senators and congressmen an the other hand have big oil, big pharma and AIPAC to buy them toys. That would be the preferred method because the power of the voter is greater, therefore the method of control used is slightly different. For example, did you think that Grey Davis really wanted to give US driver's licenses to illegal immigrants ? Anyone with half a brain can see this is politicide. But he tried it anyway. Was he that stupid or influenced ? In that case it backfired which resulted in the Governator. Would that happen to a President ? Alot less likely. You get a President who really knows WTF he is doing and there will be problems. They messed with Clinton, but didn't get really dirty. His infraction was not so great. I'm almost sure that somewhere along the line someone got his audience in private and showed him some pictures from down home in Arkansas. It doesn't matter if he is guilty of all of which he is accused during his term(s) there, all it matters is that they could make it stick. Actually the allegations are so numerous that many as I believe that he must be guilty of something. But allegations during an election are discredited often, dismissed as a ploy by the opposition. The real PTB let the game play out and figure that they can fix almost anything for "their guy". So if he is guilty and he knows they know it, the King becomes a pawn. If he is not guilty but if they convince him they can prove him guilty regardless the result is the same. For similar reasons I believe there are many innocent people in prison, they became a target. Between having the ins with judges to exclude exhonorting evidence and piling up the charges to induce a plea bargain "they" can lock anyone up they damn well please. The same applies here. Although some of them are pretty stupid. Take that Blagovitch or whatever his name was. He was almost stupid enough probably to put a senator's seat on eBay ! It's hard to find that kind of stupidity among those who live in the real world. When does a politician fall flat on his face ? Not during a speech, but during a Q & A session. Even then those present as well as the questions to be asked are screened. The bumbling comes from the unexpected. Sheeple do not realize that everything they see on TV is planned, carefully constructed to shape their opinions in the direction desired by those who contol the media, and constantly petition the government with money or the power to cast them in a negative light. The media has been called the fourth branch of government by some, and I can't argue against that. When many independent media outlets existed we had real news, from somewhere at least. But that has also been taken over. Now all the major media outlets are owned by huge conglomerates. The local newspaper is gone. Local TV stations have little if any actual local programming. And the structure of a news "show" is something to behold. They have it to the point where they can tell you your Mother just died and distract you quickly enough to run down to Walmart before even calling to find out how Dad's doing. You think I'm kidding fine, but I am not. Think of it - "250,000 dead in BFE due to an accident by the US military, after the commercial break, where to get a great hairdo and new gadgets for Christmas this year, the HOTTEST gifts" Perhaps that example runs to the extreme, but I wanted to illustrate the point. And the problem is, people don't even have a clue. They don't realize to make a TV show, such as the news, costs alot of money. Who gives up that money has control over the content. But to those who control, that money is not only a drop in the bucket, but considered a good investment. Must maintain control. T
|