cuckoldmepls
Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007 Status: offline
|
The recent arrests of a small renegade group of militia members included one democrat apparently. The main stream media doesn't want you to know that. When democrats begin taking action, it's a sure sign that people are fed up with the federal government. By the way, 10 people out of 300 million does not condemn an entire political movement. These people were obviously insane if they thought 10 people could take on the entire federal government. I like to remind people that back in the 60's liberals were kidnapping people (patty hearst) and blowing things up to get their way. Law enforcement never did a thing about it until they actually did something. In order to quell the unrest, congress began catering to them, and now we are $10 trillion in debt, with a nation of young people who think we owe them something. Actually, no one owes you crap. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/lachlan-markay/2010/04/02/least-one-arrested-militiaman-registered-democrat ** The Blade, a newspaper in Toledo, Ohio reported today, Most of the indicted militia members accused of being anti-government extremists have active voting records, a check with area voter registration offices showed yesterday. One is a registered Democrat, and the party affiliations of the rest could not be determined.. ...... This is a great page explaining the constitutional militia and the implications of gun control, and any militia who represents the majority and doesn't call for the extermination of a race of people is a good militia to be supported, not feared. Just ask yourself why should 535 members of Congress and one President be able to do what ever they want? As Nancy Pelosi said, "the President is not the King of England." I for one would rather the majority rule by militias rather than liberals rule by Congress. http://babelishere.webs.com/guncontrol.html
|