Domin8tingUrDrmz
Posts: 1269
Joined: 4/8/2006 From: Portland Metro, Oregon Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: azjojoba The CM censors are surprisingly puritanical when it comes to male nudity -- they usually won't allow it. They seem to be much more accepting of racy female pictures. I'm not sure why the double standard but maybe that reflects women's view that pornographic male nudity is threatening or disgusting. Ironically dominant females don't hesitate to order their subs to get naked. Go figure that! I'm sure you are aware that the moderators here are volunteers. They don't generally go around *looking* for photos to yank. They rely on the members to report the photos. Perhaps the disparity is due to how the genders are wired. Men tend to enjoy the racy photos of women, so men don't report the photos. Women don't enjoy the in-your-face-shots, and report them as offensive, so they get pulled. I wouldn't blame CM for the imbalance. Instead, men should consider it a clue. ETA: Personally, I don't go around looking for images to report. I generally don't care what photos people use to represent themselves. Quite frankly, it allows me the ability to move along faster, rather than investing too much time with someone I likely wouldn't find compatible. However, when someone sends me an unsolicited photo that I consider vulgar, or if it is their main profile pic and it's in my face when I log on, I will report the photo. What they have as secondary photos doesn't matter to me in the slightest and I won't report any secondary photos no matter how vulgar I may consider them.
< Message edited by Domin8tingUrDrmz -- 4/8/2010 12:51:38 AM >
_____________________________
4 out of 3 people have trouble with fractions. Ask a Mistress Forum FAQ Profile Help
|