Protocols that surpass personal preference (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


beej -> Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/6/2010 1:08:14 PM)

"Service Styles" came up as a topic in one of my regional discussion forums, and i thought i'd bring it over here to get some perspective.

since dominance flows through all of the small details of an encounter, which elements in a sub's service style do you consider to be most important 1) to maintaining or cultivating your dominance, and 2) to enhancing and/or feeding your sub's desire to serve? by elements, i mean to clothe him or not to clothe him? keep him on a leash at your knee, or assign him tasks to do in a bowtie at a desk? do you use formal language patterns constantly, or do you speak formally only during play and casually otherwise even when he is in service? are you particular about things as small as whether he opens your cola before he hands you the bottle?

just hoped that some of you might share your scheme, as it were and the reasons why you set up your protocol as such, where it is an extension of your dominance and more than just personal preference. also, i would love to hear from the subs what you enjoy most, a meticulous protocol or something that allows for more spontaneous devotion on your part.




MzticStormz -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/6/2010 10:19:49 PM)

Like many I have levels of protocol - the lowest being the level that I prefer around people that know us well but are vanilla and if children are present. With each level more details are required becoming more obvious with each level. As far as the details go, you have to make them comfortable for you as a Dominant in order to maintain them. If you are a detail type person then use details but if you are more relaxed and you end up with your protocols feeling like a chore it is not going to enhance or feed either your desires or your submissives.

I do like some details such as how a bottle is opened simply because it is something that if done in an easy way vanillas would not notice the subtleties. You and your submissive know and a look of approval or disapproval can be exchanged ... to be acted upon later when there are no vanillas or children.





LPslittleclip -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/6/2010 10:23:19 PM)

my Mistress is a leather oriented protocall Mistress. when at home i am taught to give propper respect and naked whenever possible She preferes me to be on Her leash when in apropriate settings(dont want to scare those who dont want to be). this is how O/our poly family works, for yours You will have to find the things that work with Your dynamic and eliminate the ones that dont




Andalusite -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/7/2010 6:18:30 PM)

I would assume that the protocols would come about because of personal preference in the first place. [;)]




JhonDean -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/8/2010 3:16:14 AM)

Protocol, elusive in a clearly defined understanding as it is often highly individualized but once established it is of the utmost importance to me. Structured formalities, rites, rituals rules and regulations governing conducts and behaviors offer little opportunity to lose sight of the commitments I have made. Each governed act or action inspires further devotion but I have always craved the challenge of setting the self aside and dismissing personal interests so what is right for me is of little interest to most women and that is very exciting for me.




LadyHugs -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/8/2010 6:54:28 AM)

Dear beej,

You inquired:
quote:

ORIGINAL: beej

"Service Styles" came up as a topic in one of my regional discussion forums, and i thought i'd bring it over here to get some perspective.

since dominance flows through all of the small details of an encounter, which elements in a sub's service style do you consider to be most important 1) to maintaining or cultivating your dominance, and 2) to enhancing and/or feeding your sub's desire to serve?

My answer would be both 1 and 2.  The power exchange takes two (or more if it is a multi-slave family); to give that flow back and forth. To give out one way and not get back a response that maintains the Dominant as well as the slave/sub/servant; and feeding the Dominant as well as the slave/sub/servant  and/or; the enhancing the Dominant as well as the slave/sub/servant; would not create the best platform for communication, openness to what is seen, heard and or felt in many levels of the two (or more ) in the relationship. Anybody can be "domineering" and or "helpful" --however, to live a lifestyle based on a Female power and those to whom enjoy serving under that power--all parties must be kept pleased but, always striving for improvement in the relationship, in my opinion.

by elements, i mean to clothe him or not to clothe him?

This particular element is very important, as a uniform -- be it in his/her nudity or not.  I would also mention that I don't feel those who seek "forced clothing, forced sex or forced femmie" is what it appears.  Nothing is forced in a consensual relationship.  If your heart isn't into sticking with a "rule/protocol" about clothing --there will be times slaves/subs/servants will do for themselves and dress how 'they' wish to and thus, removes just this element out of many under the uniformity of the "House Rules" and or the Owner's preferences based on a prolong rule, temporary rule, special rules as far as the dress code.  Slaves/submissives/servants should not be 'surprised' with a S/S/S' appearance.  I have my slaves informed what will be the uniform of the day...be it naked or clothed; and when these uniforms will change to appear in public.

keep him on a leash at your knee, or assign him tasks to do in a bowtie at a desk?

I use all of these things, within physical and circumstances.  Knowing a slave/sub/servant may need the connection of touch, texture/sensation, or position --these are and do feed both the Dominant and slave/sub/servant.  Just one of many elements needed in my relationship.  I want/need to always have a connection to my slaves...the strongest being their heart.

do you use formal language patterns constantly, or do you speak formally only during play and casually otherwise even when he is in service?

I do speak more formally to my slaves than I do my fellow Dominants.  I tend to borrow from the military in this way, as to maintain an established line between my dominance and their submission.  There is no 'equality' here.  Respect - Very much so! However, speech is an element that can easily slip into a much more casual and equal state.  When my slaves are collared, they must understand before that committment, that they will never be totally equal and though I may/can/will speak to them quietly or informal, my words are commands and to be taken literally.  It is my duty to make sure what intentions I have for them and how far to take what I say literally.  It is my responsibility to be a leader.  Further, being a good listener and listen to my slave's words and or feelings about whatever is discussed is necessary and wanted.  I know I am not a perfect dominant and a slave may have wisdom in an area where I may lack, e.g. mechanics, procedure, etc.  There should be no feelings of being threatened or challenged when a slave of mine wishes to inform me, educate me and or enhance me as a person and as their Dominant.  

are you particular about things as small as whether he opens your cola before he hands you the bottle?

Oh, I do admit I do have my preferences on how slaves serve me.  It also depends on how new they are to service to me and what the situation is.  For me, the slave is required to open the cola can or bottle.  A bottle though can be reclosed whereas, a can cannot be unless there are adaptors.  If I must walk hands free, the slave must carry that soda for me.  I also prefer that my soda, is always in his weak hand.  It goes back to military protocol history, in never handing a superior a weapon or item in the strong hand, which demonstrates submission/respect/non threating movements.  This in turn maintains the line between us, as Dominant and slave.

just hoped that some of you might share your scheme, as it were and the reasons why you set up your protocol as such, where it is an extension of your dominance and more than just personal preference. also, i would love to hear from the subs what you enjoy most, a meticulous protocol or something that allows for more spontaneous devotion on your part.


Lady Hugs




DWCskitten -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/8/2010 2:48:35 PM)

Master Sir is heavy on protocol most of the time.




beej -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/10/2010 9:28:50 AM)

thanks everyone. VERY enlightening responses.




leadership527 -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/10/2010 12:34:43 PM)

1) to maintaining or cultivating your dominance
none. I have no need to maintain or cultivate my dominance. It is just a fact of my life like breathing. I suppose just like breathing, every once in a while it becomes difficult for various reasons. During those times surface gestures on her part are very helpful. But in vast majority of the cases, my dominance is just a part of who I am.

2) to enhancing and/or feeding your sub's desire to serve? by elements, i mean to clothe him or not to clothe him? keep him on a leash at your knee, or assign him tasks to do in a bowtie at a desk? do you use formal language patterns constantly, or do you speak formally only during play and casually otherwise even when he is in service? are you particular about things as small as whether he opens your cola before he hands you the bottle?
none. Carol is much like me. She has no particular desire to serve and so it does not need to be fed or enhanced. She is simply submissive. Her desire is to please me as much as she is able. If that involves a bunch of abnormal behaviors for her, then she'll square her shoulders and do them. But she's much happier when she can be pleasing to me without a lot of effort. Again, like breathing, it is not something she consciously thinks about in the vast majority of cases.

Predictably, given what I wrote above, we do not have any real protocol other than "she obeys when I command".




DaintyDemure -> RE: Protocols that surpass personal preference (4/10/2010 10:32:57 PM)

Ladylocks and Mastermonica use protocols to constantly remind me of my place in the relationship. I am expected to act the role they created for me. Various rules ensure that I act in the way they want and will never over time try to become an equal partner in the relationship. One thing is never kissing me. Kissing is reserved for their relationship with each other as equal partners. I may kiss them on or below the ankle to show love and devotion. They talk to me differently than they talk to each other. When talking to me they don't use a normal voice but high pitched like you would use taking to a pet or very young unmentionable and use simple words. They have turned pet play into pet lifestyle for me.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.171875