leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: beej so i thought more about it, and i'll add this into the mix: for myself, i think i see influence as attempting to be persuasive whereas i see control as attempting to mandate something. as DesFIP said, whatever i may attempt may not work out in any case, but for me, the difference in my intention is really important. This is exactly the reason I say that "control" is a chimera. I can "mandate" whatever the hell I want. Sure, that may talk about MY head space, but it doesn't have any basis in actuality outside my own head. It may be all hawt and sexy, but it isn't mechanically accurate. here's something I just culled from my own recent thoughts which bear on this. This is shamelessly stolen from my favorite bit of condensed leadership advice. "But titles mean little in terms of real power, which is the capacity to influence and inspire." I think that about sums it up. I have sufficient ability to both influence and inspire Carol such that I could craft an entire vision of M/s in her head and get her to value it. It wasn't a native thought to her. She has no affiliation with the BDSM world. It was entirely implanted by me. THAT, is real power. "Influence" is good enough for Mother Theresa, Martin Luther King, and Ghandi. I think I can work with it too *chuckles*. ETA: It is only my ability to influence and inspire which turns the mandate in my head into a mandate in her head.
< Message edited by leadership527 -- 4/11/2010 12:44:56 PM >
_____________________________
~Jeff I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael
|