RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again

RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

truckinslave -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/19/2010 3:02:15 PM)
quote: I do not know that Mohammed was a vicious killer Then you know nothing, and I don't have the time to start from scratch. Read the Koran

Rule -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/19/2010 5:21:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave Read the Koran Why? Mohammed had nothing to do with the Koran.

flcouple2009 -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/19/2010 5:49:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave quote: I do not know that Mohammed was a vicious killer Then you know nothing, and I don't have the time to start from scratch. Read the Koran as opposed to the peace and harmony of say the old testament? Keep nothing, kill everything, all animals, men women children, when you move into the land. You didn't intend to skip over those things while you jawed about another did you?

Moonhead -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/20/2010 4:31:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rule quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave Read the Koran Why? Mohammed had nothing to do with the Koran. He had some say on what went into it, but being illiterate left the final edit of content to others.

Jeffff -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/20/2010 5:44:46 AM)
And you know Christy, something happened a long time ago in Haiti and people might not want to talk about it. They were under the heel of the French, uh, you know Napoleon the third and whatever. And they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said we will serve you if you’ll get us free from the French. True story, and so the Devil said OK it’s a deal. And they kicked the French out. You know, the Haitians revolted and got themselves free. But ever since they’ve been cursed by one thing after the other desperately poor So when Pat Roberstson said the above I suppose He spoke for all christians?

Moonhead -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/20/2010 5:47:55 AM)
Of course. Just like the Dalai Lama speaks for all buddhists, including the other non tibetan sects that he's spent decades trying to wipe out in his little corner of India: he's been putting a lot of energy into that ever since he fled Tibet, hasn't he?

Rule -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/20/2010 7:15:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead He had some say on what went into it, but being illiterate left the final edit of content to others. His enemies wrote the Koran and twisted his words into something that conformed to their own beliefs. We had a similar case in The Netherlands a while back. A man got blown up by a land mine. The army refused to take responsibility. Eventually they were forced ot submit an evaluation concluding "We the army are responsible". The officer in charge told the secretary: "Add another word, "not". So the conclusion ended up: "We the army are not responsible". The Koran and all of Islam is not what Mohammed tried to achieve, but what his enemies twisted his efforts into.

SohCahToa -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/20/2010 7:48:30 AM)
Perhaps he wanted to take personal responsibility... "We , not the army, are responsible." It's the transcribers fault he put the 'not' in the wrong place. We, the transcribers, are responsible. We'll never know for sure the true meaning.

GotSteel -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/20/2010 1:12:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rule The Koran and all of Islam is not what Mohammed tried to achieve, but what his enemies twisted his efforts into. How exactly do you know this?

Moonhead -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/20/2010 1:17:21 PM)
It's news to me, and I suspect I've read a bit more history about the founding of Mohammed's little cult than rule has. His sidekick had a lot of impact on the Koran, and is probably a lot more responsible for the more moderate influences that persist in Islam to this day, but he was hardly an enemy of Mohammed, was he? He wouldn't have offered to transcribe the wanker's blatherings if he was.

truckinslave -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/22/2010 7:25:09 AM)
The proper comparison is Mohammed and Jesus, i.e. none.

kittinSol -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/22/2010 7:34:08 AM)
Islam recognises Jesus as a prophet of god, and recognises that it worships the same god as Judaism and Christianity. In the grand scheme of monotheistic intolerance, that's quite peaceful, really.

truckinslave -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/22/2010 7:48:17 AM)
Absolutely right, and if that's as far as it went, well, no one would be flying planes into skyscrapers. But it's not; and there's been 1600 years of war waged against Jews and Christians. And, sometimes, vice versa. But, gee, wouldn't it be great if they buried the hatchet?

kittinSol -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/22/2010 8:10:22 AM)
It sucks when religion is used by people with a belligerent agenda. It is not the prerogative of Muslims, however. Those that flew into the World Trade Center were terrorists. It's about time people stop putting peaceful Muslims (of which there are many) in the same bag as terroristic nuts (of which there are relatively few, notwithstanding the propaganda broadcasted daily on the news).

Moonhead -> RE: The Religion of Peace is spreading its love again (4/22/2010 8:17:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave Absolutely right, and if that's as far as it went, well, no one would be flying planes into skyscrapers. But it's not; and there's been 1600 years of war waged against Jews and Christians. And, sometimes, vice versa. But, gee, wouldn't it be great if they buried the hatchet? Of course, the main reason it's so easy to convince Arabs to join terrorist organisations opposed to the American Empire is because most Arabs aren't at all taken with your country's behaviour in the middle east since the second world war, even if Israel wasn't a factor in that. I'd suspect that has a lot more to do with it than Islam in itself. You might as well blame the Pope for the Fenians in Northern Ireland.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.785156E-02