Angelsmile
Posts: 113
Joined: 12/20/2005
Status: offline
|
I don't know if its true but an article said that neither BP nor the US government really knows how to fix that big whole in the ground to stop the oil. Looks like all those "experts" are in fact the most incapable and clueless people ever (they just shrug and let it flow who cares not them). What they are doing is worse than the 911 attack and the war in Iraq because it took millions of years to create the sea animals and BP will make them become extinct in just a few weeks.
Not only the oil in the water but also the oil gazes will spread all over the world and we will breeth oil and it will rain down on our corn, oat and wheat, on our salad, ... on everything, on the grass the cattle eats and we eat it with our beef steak later.
Probably most people will get a cancer in the next 10 years and probably if this continues like that and those BP people keep on doing nothing against it cause they are such big experts who have no clue so they just sit and wait, then this might endanger agriculture. Nobody has ever destroyed our planet more than BP and nobody could ever care less then them. Therefore some people gathered to boykott BP (there are several boykott websites in the internet). Some articles said that they knew about the risk that this could happen as the technology on the rig was not appropriate but ignored it long before - because who cares not them. Also some experts say that the amout of spill is deliberate disinformation and that in fact the amounts are much higher. http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/computers/blogs/dirty-facts-about-the-bp-oil-catastrophe http://mydd.com/users/pravin/posts/is-obama-just-clueless Should a company which is totally clueless about their own business and a company which could not care less about the death of people and animals and damages to nature still be operative ? Why is their boss not in jail ? And why can they open more rigs with the same technology ? Because the US is dependent of them and has no replacement for them an article says so basically because politicians are dependent of large corporations they can do as they please. Democracy was yesterday, today the corporations rule - and we pay. I bet they will just finance the damages they have caused by higher prices to the customers and in the end we pay as usual for the mess they have caused. They were even impertinent enough to ask for volunteers (people who work unpaid !) to clear up the mess BP caused on their shores. So much they don't care. Why is the government doing nothing against this ? Is it that they just cannot as the article said because they are so dependent on the big corporations ? Or has there been a bribe ?
How much the CEO of BP "cares" also about people with a wicked smile shows this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b6J7LRUTFY
with the title BP's CEO Tony Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world'
Maybe that's now the right course of Tony Hayward to destroy the world.
So people wonder what kind of business this guy is running.
Did he ever say that he is sorry for the people and animals who died and the famillies who will loose their existance because of him ? I could not find a single "sorry" anywhere. But that article "Trying to shirk responsibility for spill, BP CEO predicts ‘lots of illegitimate’ lawsuits because ‘this is America.’
On Monday, Hayward told Good Morning America, “This wasn’t our accident. … This was a drilling rig operated by another company. It was their people, their systems, their processes. We are responsible not for the accident.”
So trying to get away with lies seems to be more business like to that guy than taking on responsability for his acts.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/06/hayward-america-illegitimate/
Tony Hayward, BP CEO: Gulf Oil Spill 'Relatively Tiny'
(oh yeah we can see how tiny it is, just the biggest pollution we ever had on our planet but for him its tiny maybe he meant his sense of responsability and bad conscience which is tiny)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/14/bp-ceo-gulf-oil-spill-rel_n_576215.html
Is this guy deliberately lieing or is he so far from reality / close to reality loss or is it that he just really doesn't know what he is talking about and has absolutely no clue of his business hence just saying random things people would love to hear ?
Hayward told Fox News sister network Sky News that he is largely unconcerned:
I think the environmental impact of this disaster is likely to be very, very modest. It is impossible to say and we will mount, as part of the aftermath, a very detailed environmental assessment as we go forward. We’re going to do that with some of the science institutions in the U.S. But everything we can see at the moment suggests that the overall environmental impact of this will be very, very modest.
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/05/19/hayward-modest-oilpocalypse/
Between the biggest environmental impact ever and a very modes impact lays a huge gap. So where comes reality into the game here ? If reality is still important for such a man.
But who cares the suffering fishes, birds who die, who cares the cruelty ? Not him.
The only thing which counts is: PROFIT
BP's Profit Ambitions: increase annual profits by more than $3 billion over the next several years and to expand production as much as two percent a year through 2015. (and maybe cause more environmental desasters)
http://industry.bnet.com/energy/10003323/bps-profit-ambitions-an-oil-majors-guide-to-adding-another-3-billion-to-its-bottom-line/
Wondering what will he do with all that money when our food is oil poisend from oily rain ?
But as the CEO said: "We had too many people who wanted to save the world"
that clearly states what he is up to at least. So what sort of company is this man running ?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/bp-ceo-hayward-we-had-too_b_585610.html
"Too bad Tony Hayward hadn't spent more time thinking about "saving the world." Maybe this disaster would have never happened if he had.
Too bad BP tried to pretend they were something they weren't because now not only is the public outraged, they don't trust a single thing the company has to say."
Do you believe them when they say that they will pay all "Legitimate Claims" ? They will never be able to pay for the extinction of sea animals who will have disappeared forever they cannot, but are still bratty.
BP Says It Will Pay All 'Legitimate Claims': What Does That Mean?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/24/bp-says-it-will-pay-all-l_n_587145.html
Whenever a businessman had made a mistake no matter which company was concerned in the end it was always the customers who paid. Hence those boycott initiatives which can be found in the internet are the only viable way to avoid this.
If you want to do something about it you will find many boycott initiatives, one of them is: http://last-lost-empire.com/blog/?p=244 or http://boycottbp.org/why
much more can be found by google search:
Interesting questions would still be:
" Are BP's legal costs, cleanup costs and liabilities available as corporate tax write-off's?
If so, is there any way for US citizens to refuse to subsidize BP's mistakes? "
< Message edited by Angelsmile -- 5/25/2010 7:19:21 PM >
|
Was the Gulf Oil Spill an Act of War? You Betcha - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread