Brain -> To replace John Paul Stevens, an atheist (5/4/2010 11:20:33 PM)
|
President Obama should absolutely take into account the religious views of his next nominee for the Supreme Court, but not for the usual reasons, Marc Cooper says. "Clearly, the next person to take the bench should be an atheist," he writes for the Los Angeles Times. Having a nonbeliever on the bench would be a "mighty blow" in favor of the Jeffersonian principles of reason and freedom. What a concept, someone on the Supreme Court that is capable of rational thought! To replace John Paul Stevens, an atheist While few sitting politicians have the political courage to name a declared nonbeliever, it is something that Thomas Jefferson (and several others among the founders) might well have done. In an 1823 letter to John Adams, Jefferson was forthright about his views of religion, and Christianity specifically. "And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerve in the brain of Jupiter," Jefferson wrote. "But may we hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this most venerated reformer of human errors." In other words, Jefferson liked what Jesus, the man, stood for, but could definitely do without the rest of the bunk. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe--cooper-20100504,0,4381869,full.story
|
|
|
|