AquaticSub -> RE: Requiring Body Transformation (Weight Loss) in a M/s Relationship (5/5/2010 10:53:05 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AspX I know I am probably gonna get crushed for asking these questions because so many people are so defensive about body issues, specifically involving weight. However, this is a set of questions I've had in my mind and I think it will make for an interesting topic as long as people don't get too upset or defensive. This post will only ask the questions and I will provide me own comment and opinion as a response. I am also specifically using the generic terms top and bottom rather than master, domme, sub or slave because each one of these distinctions may have a completely different viewpoint as to this type of service. You may want to search for previous threads. This topic has been discussed before from various angles. quote:
As part of a long-term M/s relationship, does anyone here require the bottom to transform their body so that it is more pleasing to their top? No. If he didn't enjoy my body to begin with, he wouldn't have bothered with me. quote:
Do tops view their bottom's physical appearance as a reflection of themselves when they take the bottom out in public (whether it be an actual BDSM activity or just to the grocery store)? Yes and no. Everyone he is a seen with, from me to his friends, are a reflection on him because we are the people he chooses to surround himself with. But again, if he wasn't pleased with my appearence to begin with, I wouldn't have been with the effort. quote:
Does requiring the bottom to journal what they eat, or limit caloric/carb/fat intake, or exercise for a certain amount of time (or in a certain way) in order to make themselves more physically attractive increase the bond of service by having the bottom serve in little ways throughout the entire day? We don't think so. We hold the opinion that losing weight or quitting anything for the top is bad for the bottom in the long run. Should the relationship fail or the top be taken away by an untimely death, the bottom no longer has a reason to maintain their schedule and will probably fall back on old habits quickly - rapid weight gain is bad for the body. When I lost weight (45 pounds +) it was my job to keep track of my weight loss, not his. quote:
Does the top's physical appearance play into the bottom's willingness or attitude towards this type of control (i.e., is the top being a hypocrite because they are severely overweight vs. the top being in good physical shape and wanting the same from their partner)? If, by some circumstance, I were willing to submit to such a program, yes it would. It's one thing to require me to excerise when you are there and willing to support me and it's another thing to require it while you sit there, eating doughnuts. It'd be a brand of sadism that holds no appeal to me and I wouldn't be interested in having in a partner. quote:
Does it make a difference if a sub is overweight to the point of possible long-term health concerns such as diabetes, high cholesterol, joint issues (ankle, knee and hip problems), etc... by changing the equation from being an issue of "pleasing the top" to one of "taking care of the bottom"? Slightly. But if the concern is health, again, I don't believe it's best handled by having the top enforce it. Better, IHMO, that the top order the sub to nutritionists and doctors. The change has to come from within or, at best, the top will be battling the sub's weight for them for the entire relationship. quote:
Would going the opposite way, the top having a fet fetish and wanting the bottom to increase rather than decrease their size, change your answers to the previous questions? Not particularly.
|
|
|
|