Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


rulemylife -> Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 4:29:36 AM)

I watched this on Anderson Cooper this morning and couldn't believe what I was hearing.

The idiot that was relieved of his duties at FEMA for his incompetence during Katrina and soon resigned is now promoting a conspiracy theory that the Obama administration purposely delayed reaction to the oil spill to promote its energy and environmental policies.

"Brownie, you're doing a heckuva job"



Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill


Michael Brown is still not backing down from his claim that President Obama is playing politics with the Gulf Coast oil spill, saying last night that the administration wants "to use a crisis like this to shut down oil and gas drilling."

Brown had said on Fox News on Monday that Obama delayed his response to the spill out of "pure politics," and so he could "pander to the environmentalists" on offshore drilling "and say, 'I'm gonna shut it down because it's too dangerous.'"

Despite an earlier appearance yesterday on Hardball, during which Chris Matthews called some of his theories "insane," Brown tripled down on his accusations to Anderson Cooper last night.

"They want this crisis so that they can respond to it," said Brown, something he repeated several times throughout the interview. "They want a crisis like this so that they can use a crisis like this to shut down oil and gas drilling." Anderson Cooper, for his part, pushed back at Brown's claims, asking him for evidence that this was what the President wanted.

Brown simply repeated: "They want to use the crisis".




Lucylastic -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 4:50:21 AM)

well as someone said on another site, and I cant find the  link
he is an expert in failed crisis management:)
so he should know what he is talking about, LOL dayam wheres that sarcasm font when you need it







servantforuse -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 4:57:09 AM)

Obama has never supported off shore drilling, or for that matter any type of drilling (Anwar) ? Now he has the perfect excuse to not support it. Michael Brown is calling it for what it is.




Louve00 -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 4:59:00 AM)

Give it a few minutes for it to catch on here, too.  I look forward to seeing the comments. [;)]

Ooops, when I look up I see Servant's already jumped on it.  So unpredictable.  [:D]




Lucylastic -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 5:12:21 AM)

yeah see??? its a monumental obama cover up....damn the man
I trust servants opinion as far as I could throw an oil rig
outright denial or conspiracy is all they have anymore
too funny, and not unexpected..




Moonhead -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 5:40:11 AM)

Wasn't Obama pro offshore drilling while campaigning the other year? He just wasn't as loud and obnoxious about it as McCain and his retarded Alaskan gimp were.




servantforuse -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 6:14:34 AM)

Have you seen a new drilling rig off any of our coasts ? He said he was for it but you won't see it while he is president.




mnottertail -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 6:22:05 AM)

Uh, there are alot of issues outside of Obama saying, Drill Baby Drill, you untutored lout.

By example, the individual states where the leases will be executed have some say in the fucking matter and for the most part they ain't happy.  There are bidding processes have to take place, legal reviews and the like.

He can propose, not implement.  He isn't the end all be all in that sphere, there are a couple other people got to be involved,  and you dont sink a pipe offshore or have a drilling rig or platform just laying around bobbing in the ocean like a weeble wobbling just waiting for callow republicans to become president.





pahunkboy -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 6:22:47 AM)

the rig cost 800 million $.




flcouple2009 -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 6:30:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Have you seen a new drilling rig off any of our coasts ? He said he was for it but you won't see it while he is president.


OK, let's think about this for a moment.  There have been 2 major deep water blowouts in about 7 months.  The Australian's are expected to release the findings on what happened in the Timor Sea in June.  We haven't even begun to get this one capped much less start finding out what failed.

Most of the new wells they are talking about drilling are gonna be in deep water.  You think just maybe you might want to figure out what has happened and make whatever changes may be needed before punching any new holes?








DarkSteven -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 6:43:26 AM)

In the good old days, failures slinked off and shut up.  They didn't proclaim themselves experts and criticize everyone else.

The guy got fired as a horseman and as a crisis man.  Dunno what he can realistically comment on.




tazzygirl -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 6:51:40 AM)



quote:

Michael Brown is still not backing down from his claim that President Obama is playing politics with the Gulf Coast oil spill, saying last night that the administration wants "to use a crisis like this to shut down oil and gas drilling."

Brown had said on Fox News on Monday that Obama delayed his response to the spill out of "pure politics," and so he could "pander to the environmentalists" on offshore drilling "and say, 'I'm gonna shut it down because it's too dangerous.'"

Despite an earlier appearance yesterday on Hardball, during which Chris Matthews called some of his theories "insane," Brown tripled down on his accusations to Anderson Cooper last night.

"They want this crisis so that they can respond to it," said Brown, something he repeated several times throughout the interview. "They want a crisis like this so that they can use a crisis like this to shut down oil and gas drilling." Anderson Cooper, for his part, pushed back at Brown's claims, asking him for evidence that this was what the President wanted.

Brown simply repeated: "They want to use the crisis".



The man responsible for a national incompetence when dealing with natural disasters has no place accusing anyone of utilizing an opportunity when it comes to any disaster..

1000 barrels a day is a while lot less than 5000.

Interesting article i found....

The Gulf Coast BP Oil Spill: A Timeline
Justin Elliott | April 30, 2010, 2:28PM


quote:

Ten days ago, after an explosion occurred on BP's Deepwater Horizon rig off the Gulf Coast, the initial word from the Coast Guard was that there was no oil spill. That soon changed as the government announced that 1,000 barrels of thick oil per day were spilling into the ocean.

Then, in a dramatic shift on Wednesday evening, the government changed its 1,000 barrels estimate to 5,000 barrels per day. BP initially rejected the new estimate about the spill, which experts now believe could be worse than the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster.

We're sure to learn more in the coming months and years about what the government and BP knew about the scope of the disaster, when they knew it, and whether they responded appropriately. For now, TPMmuckraker decided to take a look at the course of events, and the shifting public statements of company and government officials on the spill.

•April 20: At around 10 p.m. a fire is reported on the central time on the Deepwater Horizon rig, owned by Transocean Ltd. and under lease to energy giant BP, according to an April 21 statement from Transocean. There is no mention of any possible spill. Eleven workers are killed.

•April 22: With the media coverage of the explosion focusing on the missing workers and, initially, not about the possibility of a spill, AFP notes the possibility of an environmental disaster: the rig had been drilling 8,000 barrels of oil per day, and had 700,000 gallons of diesel fuel on board. "Worst case scenario, there is a potential environmental threat," Coast Guard spokeswoman Katherine McNamara tells the wire service. BP's chief executive, Tony Hayward, says BP will do "everything in our power to contain this oil spill and resolve the situation as rapidly, safely and effectively as possible." The company said it dispatched a team to deal with the oil that dispersed from the original blast.

•April 23: The day after the rig sank, the AP reports: "Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry said Friday morning that no oil appeared to be leaking from the well head at the ocean floor, nor was any leaking at the water's surface. However, Landry said crews were closely monitoring the rig for any more crude that might spill out.

•April 24: In the late afternoon, the AP reports that the Coast Guard has reversed its earlier statement that there was no oil leaking. The wire service quotes Guard officials as saying an estimated 1,000 barrels of oil per day are coming out of the well head on the ocean floor, 5,000 feet under water. Landry says that the oil may have been pouring out since the rig sank on April 22.

BP's chief operating officer, Doug Suttles, speaking about options on responding to the spill, says, "Over the next several days, we should determine which method is the best one to follow"

•April 26: BP says in a press release it is 'accelerating offshore oil recovery and continuing well control efforts. Improved weather "combined with the light, thin oil we are dealing with has further increased our confidence that we can tackle this spill offshore," says BP chief exec Tony Hayward.

•April 27: After underwater robots fail to stop the flow of oil, the coast guard floats the idea of containing pools of oil in containment booms and then setting it on fire. Meanwhile, BP says it will begin drilling a new relief well near the spill site later in the week; the process could take months.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), chair of the Energy and Commerce committee, writes a letter (.pdf) to the chairman of BP notifying him of an investigation into "what the companies knew about the risks of drilling at the site and the adequacy of the companies' response plans." He charges that "[a] striking feature of the incident is the apparent lack of an adequate plan to contain the spreading environmental damage. The two companies involved, BP Exploration and Production, Inc., and Transocean Ltd., are attempting to contain the oil spilling from the well with techniques that have never been used before at these ocean depths."

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announce an investigation of the explosion.

•April 28: Late Wednesday, the Coast Guard announces that 5,000, not 1,000, barrels a day of oil are spilling, citing a new National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration estimate. At the same press conference as the Coast Guard announcement, BP COO Doug Suttle disputes the new estimate and argues that a newly discovered leak does not change the rate of the spill. "He showed a diagram showing where the leaks are and said the newly discovered leak is upstream from the previous leaks," the AP reports.

•April 29: Suttle acknowledges on the Today Show that the government's new estimate may be accurate. In a Rose Garden statement, Obama says the Administration will use "every single available resource" to address the spill, including the military. He also says BP will have to pay the costs.


http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/the_gulf_coast_bp_oil_spill_a_timeline_1.php

Brown was the idiot who couldnt get it through his head that Maryland was no where close to Louisiana when he sent trucks full of ice to Maryland instead of the Gulf Coast as intended for the Katrina victims.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9369937/




DomYngBlk -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 7:12:02 AM)

"I think ole Brownie here is doing a pretty good job" - GWB




tazzygirl -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 7:34:15 AM)

Night and day between Fema responses when i went through hurricanes on the east coast and the horrible response for Katrina.

Your quote just adds to the list of why GWB is viewed as an idiot.




DomYngBlk -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 7:37:04 AM)

Hence, the reason for the quote. Was not an endorsement of Brownie.....




tazzygirl -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 7:40:27 AM)

Oh trust me, i understood that completely.




rulemylife -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 8:55:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Uh, there are alot of issues outside of Obama saying, Drill Baby Drill, you untutored lout.

By example, the individual states where the leases will be executed have some say in the fucking matter and for the most part they ain't happy.  There are bidding processes have to take place, legal reviews and the like.

He can propose, not implement.  He isn't the end all be all in that sphere, there are a couple other people got to be involved,  and you dont sink a pipe offshore or have a drilling rig or platform just laying around bobbing in the ocean like a weeble wobbling just waiting for callow republicans to become president.




What's really scary is that the Republicans in the Florida legislature have been been pushing to allow drilling as close as 3 miles to the coast.


If Florida lifts oil drilling ban, feds might follow | lifts, ban




rulemylife -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 9:07:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

In the good old days, failures slinked off and shut up.  They didn't proclaim themselves experts and criticize everyone else.

The guy got fired as a horseman and as a crisis man.  Dunno what he can realistically comment on.



If you watched the additional links in the original article, the interviews with Cavuto and Matthews, he tries to lay off the blame for Katrina on Bush.

Not that Bush doesn't bear responsibility for hiring the idiot and then supporting him while it was obvious to the rest of the country that he had no clue, but it's just amazing to hear this guy talk as if he is an accomplished expert.




brainiacsub -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 9:15:08 AM)

I saw this twit on Cooper, too. Cooper dismissed him for the idiot that he was. Wait till he makes his way to Beck or Hannity, where he'll really find his audience.




rulemylife -> RE: Michael Brown Keeps Pushing His 'Obama Wanted The Oil Spill (5/6/2010 9:42:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

I saw this twit on Cooper, too. Cooper dismissed him for the idiot that he was. Wait till he makes his way to Beck or Hannity, where he'll really find his audience.


Actually, the whole thing started on Fox with PeeWee Herman interviewing Brown.

Watch the video in the link below.  It's hilarious.

According to Brown and Cavuto the mainstream media (which I guess FOX doesn't consider itself a part of) ignored the oil spill, which is funny because that's all I've heard about on every major news source since it first happened.


Video: Fox News defends using Michael Brown as expert on Gulf Oil




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02