leadership527 -> RE: Serious Communication Issues, advice appreciated (5/9/2010 9:49:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: UnFlinchingEye I find myself in the unenviable position of being involved with someone who professes a serious interest in 24/7 D/s or M/s life, but it doesn't really show at all. I'm not going to do the whole "not a real X" BS, but I'm having trouble setting context of the relationship due to what seems to be a serious dislike of communication on her part. Stressing the importance of setting boundaries and principles generally ends with an " I don't know." and attempts at guidance result in defensiveness and phrases like "You don't have to find something to be angry with me about every day!". The latter sort of comment pops up even while I'm using an even tone and am explaining how I'm feeling. Any advice aside from the expected "Get out!"? I agree -- unenviable... especially considering your later posts. With the understanding that I know almost nothing here, it sounds to me like yet another woman who is more in love with the fantasy of submission than the actual fact of it. In general, I note a great deal of romance involved with the idea. You can see it in pretty much any Harlequin romance story. Obviously, as a fantasy, submission has a great appeal for women in general (not to be confused with all women). From what your describing though, she is not actually a submissive personality. On a much deeper level, there are significant relationship problems here. Generically, you state "I want to discuss something important" and then she blows you off with a "whatever" sort of comment. Honestly, that is a complete lack of respect... not respect in the funky way it's meant in BDSM-land, but real basic interpersonal respect. On the attempts at guidance thing, I'm a bit more understanding. I certainly saw similar behaviors in Carol. There is at least some non-trivial segment of the sub population that uses such tactics as a defense. Carol used to be included in that grouping. We had a long talk about her use of "the emotional tailspin" being more of a debate tactic than a genuine response. We also talked seriously about the need for me to be able to give guidance in a constructive and healthy atmosphere. I particularly stressed the point that when I'm actually angry, I'm quite good at communicating that. She needn't read anything into guidance other than the fact that it's guidance -- simply my steering the ship, exactly as the job description says I must. Sorry, no real silver bullets for you... just as you anticipated. Just my 2c worth which probably aren't actually even worth 2c.
|
|
|
|