juliaoceania -> RE: agnostic or atheist? (5/14/2010 12:56:05 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pyroaquatic quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania So is the obvious conclusion that there was no other form of consciousness around prior to the Big Bang? My little pittling Homo sapien brain does not pretend to understand how it all got here, you must forgive my inability to time travel and have it all figured out. I will say what I always say on this matter.... the only intellectually valid answer about this subject is that of the agnostic. Anyone that pretends to have the one true answer is basing that on their personal beliefs. Yes, I have beliefs, and they are every bit as valid as anyone else's... even those who think some random chain of amino acids explains it all You are trying to say a belief system is the same as a scientific theory. Do you believe any scientific theory is true? You can have all the proof you want but it does not mean squat. Nothing is Absolute. Nothing is static. Everything, including science, is subject to change. Yes I do see the irony of these last two comments but it is just a theory. Belief and Theory. Ha. The scientific method is a method to try to answer questions about the world.... but the thing is that the scientific method isn't perfect, those who use it make mistakes too. There are many ways to understand the world, through the lens of science is but one way. Science is steeped in Western ideology. Those who push forward science as being the best way to understand the world are doing so from their own cultural perspective... science is a cultural artifact. Of course those who think they can run around objectively explaining the universe and their place in it by the use of "science" do not want to think of it this way, why? Because it would challenge their entire belief structure, that which they base their lives on. Of course their culture is superior to how other people view the world! How silly everyone else is to challenge them!
|
|
|
|