TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
Threats are a part of speech that live in the grey area, Jlf. How serious is the threat? How seriously is it taken. It all gets pretty subjective. We draw a hard line at threatening the life of the President, and even from my perspective, I'm completely ok with that. Criminal conspiracy is another matter. When I get together with a certain cousin, or a few other like minded people, our conversations are damn near illegal. We'll formulate the perfect alibi to commit murder, or plan to rob a bank, take down a drug dealer, or blow up a hated institution. I say damn near illegal, because there is no actual intent, and no acts are ever taken to further the plan. We are just freely expressing ourselves and having some laughs. This Hutaree case is kind of interesting, as it develops. I have to wonder if a decision wasn't made to just disrupt a possible threat, and send a message along to a lot of the other loony groups, even if they can't get convictions on what they have. These are challenging times for free speech. An artist giving a lecture at a Swedish university in the last couple days was attacked by a mob of muslim students because they didn't like what he was saying and had said previously. When their violence ended his presentation, thay all chanted "Allah Akbar" in celebration. It's the same thing the traitor Nadal shouted when he jumped up and started killing soldiers. How protected are those words going to be in the years ahead of us?
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|