|
MistressJaynie -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/17/2010 2:00:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha
quote:
ORIGINAL: MistressJaynie
Lady Angelika states 'The terms [timewaster and fake] are in principle self-explanatory but more importantly, they are highly subjective. That is what I'm trying to convey to you....
Ok, thanks for your continued responses. I think 'highly subjective' is pushing the case a tad too far. Most things are open to interpretation, I agree. But, to repeat myself again, someone who cruelly sets out to deceive people by inventing profiles on here - a man pretending to be a woman, people with numerous such profiles... how can they be classified as anything but fake? How, in other words, is that subjective? They are obvjectively faking a persona for their own ends; not to maybe by-the-by inculate themselves into the scene, in safe, easy chunks. They are using the site to use people in the worst possible way, in my view.
You go on to say 'Someone you might consider a timewaster might be an investment for someone else. Those you might dismiss as inauthentic might be perfect for someone else'. How could those types I describe be rehabilitated in the way you describe? I'm not speaking about differences in what one Dom/me or another might be seeking. Again, I'm talking of those who do not intend to meet or to enter into the scene. Said faker would have to stop being a faker in order to be useful in the manner you describe. In that case, s/he is no longer a faker, and I would not be criticising that person - regretable past exploits notwithstanding.
quote:
MistressJaynie
Ok, time for another hypothetical question , since everything is so self explanatory.....what would you say IF there was someone posting about fakers and timewasters and had some other profiles, that possibly didnt have the same dominant leanings as the one that was all upset about timewasters and fakes? Would they be fake?Just a stray random thought that doesnt have anything, of course, to do with the posters on this thread
If I get you right, yoiu are aiming this at me...? Do you mean Kitton's profile? (If she still has one on here, I don't know. Last she said she'd got tired of cyber. But I don't know whether she deleted, hibernated or left her profile.).She's my partner - slave, submissive for sure. You can see from my pics I'm part of a couple. Or do you mean Amber? She's a friend who comes here for play, but who is looking independently as well. I've made no secret that I am part of a couple and polyamorous. I'm confused. You have me very wrong - and it's dispiriting to see what I set out to do here constructively is rubbished with such accusations. These are the only factors I'm aware of that ciuld lead you to querry my honesty, if that is what you are doing.
|
|
|
|
