RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 8:20:53 AM)

I read back through your posts. The only taxes you were willing to cop too were Federal, State and local. You insisted it was only those taxes. Clearly you have no idea what was on his payroll deduction. Many deductions reduce his tax debt liability until much later, if at all. Insurance is pre-tax dollars, so are most retirement plans. If he invested heavily into both, of course his total take home would be much less... because he is stock piling it for later... not because its coming out in "taxes"




tazzygirl -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 8:25:49 AM)

quote:

That is exactly what i stated. Federal, State, and City taxes. And other taxes and deductions that MM just mentioned as well, FICA, etc.

His retirement and investments are his business. i'm not going to discuss those here.

And just to give some numbers, taxes alone:

Federal 35% (using Domiguy's number)
NY State 6.85%
NJ State 8.97%
NY City Tax 3.648%
Total - 54.468% in taxes alone. This doesn't include the other items that MM brought up above


Thats fine, you dont have to discuss those here, no one really asked how much. BUT dont insinuate because of taxes that he pays 62% of his income... its simply not true.

2008 FICA Tax and Social Security Limits
•FICA Tax Rate = 7.65%
•Social Security Limit = $102,000
•Maximum Social Security Contribution = $6,324.00

Thats a total of 62% according to you... not including the pretax savings i posted about before. Some he paid out... not 62%.. some money gave him tax savings... some he saved for himself in the form of retirement... those were not paid out in taxes.

Man i hate it when people insult my intelligence!




thishereboi -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 8:31:08 AM)

quote:

Clearly you have no idea what was on his payroll deduction.


But clearly you do? Why don't you scan a copy of it, so we can all take a look and decide.




tazzygirl -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 8:34:56 AM)

I dont need too. The math doesnt add up... you did take basic math, yes?




domiguy -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 8:46:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

That is exactly what i stated. Federal, State, and City taxes. And other taxes and deductions that MM just mentioned as well, FICA, etc.

His retirement and investments are his business. i'm not going to discuss those here.

And just to give some numbers, taxes alone:

Federal 35% (using Domiguy's number)
NY State 6.85%
NJ State 8.97%
NY City Tax 3.648%
Total - 54.468% in taxes alone. This doesn't include the other items that MM brought up above


Thats fine, you dont have to discuss those here, no one really asked how much. BUT dont insinuate because of taxes that he pays 62% of his income... its simply not true.

2008 FICA Tax and Social Security Limits
•FICA Tax Rate = 7.65%
•Social Security Limit = $102,000
•Maximum Social Security Contribution = $6,324.00

Thats a total of 62% according to you... not including the pretax savings i posted about before. Some he paid out... not 62%.. some money gave him tax savings... some he saved for himself in the form of retirement... those were not paid out in taxes.

Man i hate it when people insult my intelligence!


tazzy is 100% correct, it is an impossibility. She is showing the worst case scenario. Worst state and city to live in. This is with no write offs or deductible expenses.

Edited to add...You have to keep in mind that the max Social security wage base in 1994 was $ 87,900. Which increased every year till it hit 102,000 in 2008.




thishereboi -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 11:18:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont need too. The math doesnt add up... you did take basic math, yes?


You're so cute, when you're condescending[8|]

I hope I am just as smart as you when I grow up, then I can go online and call people liars too.




Musicmystery -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 12:34:24 PM)

The girl made a point about her ex-owner's situation. I don't expect her to know the details. Perhaps he was talking about withholding. So she got the details technically wrong. It doesn't change her point.

Now that we're off the math, back to the point?





tazzygirl -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 12:54:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont need too. The math doesnt add up... you did take basic math, yes?


You're so cute, when you're condescending[8|]

I hope I am just as smart as you when I grow up, then I can go online and call people liars too.



awww thank you boi!!

your so cute when you are trying to be something you are not. [;)]




eyesopened -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 4:40:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
Sanity, I think the President of Brianistan was just mentioning that everyone should pay their fair share.

I would like my income to be treated as a capital gain. I would like to know why they have their income treated as a capital gain?


I think the President of Branistan said
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain
Call me old fashioned but I just think it's wrong that a single hedge fund manager earns a billion dollars, when a billion dollars would pay the salaries of about 20,000 teachers.


Robert Reich was saying that everyone should pay their fair share.  My issue is that there is a difference between tax liability and what after creative accounting one actually pays.  If one's tax liability is 15% and they pay 15% that makes me happier than one whose liability is 35% and they pay 5% or nothing at all. 

But Brain said he thinks it's wrong that someone earns a billion dollars.




thompsonx -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 4:51:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UniqueRaven

He made quite a bit more than 100K.  He's in a different tax bracket.  i was just using the 100k number as an example.  Perhaps that's what's confusing people.



So you lied and made up figures and now you wonder why people are confused at your lies???




Brain -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 6:39:56 PM)


When I get my inheritance from my American relatives I expect to pay a lot. And as far as Canada is concerned most of my income is employment income and it is deducted off the paycheck before I get any deductions so the government gets its money.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Brain,

How about YOU?

Have you paid your fair share?






Brain -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 6:46:58 PM)


These guys don't do anything that provides value to society. At least in the example you gave me somebody made something and people had the choice to buy it or not. They make way too much money for doing nothing.

I think everybody needs to pay their fair share. There needs to be a law to a minimum amount no matter how many holes there are.


quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

Why shouldn't an individual get paid for their work?  There's nothing wrong with earning a billion dollars.  Do you think everyone should have a cap on what they can earn?  Everywhere in the world or just people in the United States? 

Let's say someone invents a device that plays MP3's in a cute little package and come up with a catchy name and fabulous marketing and advertising.  Should that person only be able to earn X per year on that device no matter how many were sold?  Should such devices be limited to how many can be sold so that no one can make too much money on their invention? 

The story wasn't about how much money one makes but how that income is treated and the tax liabilities for those earnings.  Personally I'm do not care that some earnings are treated as capital gains and a lesser tax is paid.  My problem with the US tax code is the number of loopholes that allow people or corporations to earn a billions of dollars and pay no tax at all.  ExxonMobile paid no tax to the US at all in 2009. 

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Tax/ge-exxon-paid-us-income-taxes-09/story?id=10300167
The most egregious example is General Electric. Last year the conglomerate generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion.
Avoiding taxes is nothing new for General Electric. In 2008 its effective tax rate was 5.3%; in 2007 it was 15%. The marginal U.S. corporate rate is 35%.
 
Wall Street is the villian we love to hate.  But rather than pick on what is capital gains and what is income, we should be looking at closing the loopholes that allow corporations to pay no tax at all.





thishereboi -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 6:49:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain


When I get my inheritance from my American relatives I expect to pay a lot. And as far as Canada is concerned most of my income is employment income and it is deducted off the paycheck before I get any deductions so the government gets its money.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Brain,

How about YOU?

Have you paid your fair share?





I heard the right wingers are going to push through the "brain bill". It states that no one can inherit money from family in the US if they are living in Canada. They are going to take the money and donate it to the homeless billionaire support group. And I know it's true, cause I heard it on Rush[8D]




Brain -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 7:06:09 PM)

Canadians pay taxes based on residency. So if you live in Canada you pay taxes based on your world income. If you are a Canadian and live in the United States you pay no taxes to Canada.

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

I don't think Canadians pay taxes in the US.

Evidently Canada doesn't have any billionaires for Brain to complain about.





Brain -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 7:13:51 PM)

I think because he is her ex he does not want her to know he is doing well so she got won’t him for money.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88


quote:

ORIGINAL: UniqueRaven

My ex was a Wall Street Banker (he's a consultant now).

He paid 62% of his income in Federal, State, and City taxes - and that was after any "loopholes" people think are so unfair.

Imagine earning $100,000 and only taking home $38,000 of it.  How fair is that to you? 

His income went to pay for schools, hospitals, retirement homes, garbage collection, city services, etc. - all for people who often had very little, or even nothing.

i'm not one for debate.  Just saying that the perception that those that earn a high income are somehow "unfair" to those that don't isn't valid.



Then your ex had the world's suckiest accountant ever. My ex (whom I still work for at the business) made over 150k in 2007 and paid 22k in taxes. There is no way that in any state someone made 100k and paid 62 of it in taxes. How, exactly, does that work?

If he is a consultant now, tell him to incorporate. He sounds like he isn't cut out to be consulting anyone based on those figures, but if he is, incorporate. He will save tens of thousands.





AnimusRex -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 7:15:03 PM)

Fast reply-

Regardless of how much people say they are paying in taxes- the wealth of the richest 5% has skyrocketed in the past 20 years, taxes or no taxes. They are not suffering.

Its partly about asking people to pay their fair share- but in response to those who say, "why should we care if a few make billions while the rest of us don't" the answer is that vast extremes of wealth and poverty are inherently corrosive to the notion of a unified civil society- it breeds the notion that we are many, not one, that we inhabit different nations, not the same.

Even as it is, we are becoming a society segregated by wealth tiers- the wealthy live in walled mini-cities, attend different schools, shop at different stores, even drive on different highways- this is dangerous stuff for a democracy. Without a sense of shared identity, of a common purpose and shared profit and loss, democracy itself becomes impossible to create.




Brain -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 7:18:52 PM)


Your example is ridiculous, try coming up with an example that is plausible.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


In Brianistan the rich can never pay enough. They will be taxed to the point that everyone is dirt poor, at which point everyone is finally equal.

Imagine.


quote:

ORIGINAL: UniqueRaven

My ex was a Wall Street Banker (he's a consultant now).

He paid 62% of his income in Federal, State, and City taxes - and that was after any "loopholes" people think are so unfair.

Imagine earning $100,000 and only taking home $38,000 of it.  How fair is that to you? 

His income went to pay for schools, hospitals, retirement homes, garbage collection, city services, etc. - all for people who often had very little, or even nothing.

i'm not one for debate.  Just saying that the perception that those that earn a high income are somehow "unfair" to those that don't isn't valid.






Brain -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 7:26:08 PM)

I agree with you. But if you listen to Sanity everything is okay and more tax cuts are needed.




Aynne88 -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 8:02:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The girl made a point about her ex-owner's situation. I don't expect her to know the details. Perhaps he was talking about withholding. So she got the details technically wrong. It doesn't change her point.

Now that we're off the math, back to the point?




Sorry Tim, but "the girl" claimed to work for him and/or assist him in this, and having owned a business for 22 years, it just doesn't add up. No I don't have proof, and I don't care to get into an argument over it, but it just isn't logical to me. However, she can't claim ignorance to the details after claiming that she was right there assisting him.




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Closing Tax Loopholes for Billionaires (5/24/2010 8:06:45 PM)

Why don't we make it fair for single people too, and not penalize them for not having dependents. When people decide to raise a family, that's their choice. Why should they get a break to make up for the cost of their dependents. That's another form of subsidizing, which is what socialism is all about. making others pay for their lifestyle or standard of living.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875