DCWoody
Posts: 1401
Joined: 10/27/2006 Status: offline
|
That's a fairly standard comparative device, I would have assumed, seeing that pic, that it was standard example of cost/benefit for use with....eg...durability of equipment.....and I'm not convinced by the article that that is anything to do with human life....maybe I'm wrong, but it looks like they've taken a cost benefit analysis with the BP logo on it and just decided that it was designed for human life..... that view apparently wasn't accepted at the enquiry into the 2005 explosion. It looks to me like some educational thingy, presumably aimed at people fairly low down the corporate ladder. tl;dr - don't believe everything you read in news, the story may possibly be accurate, but it looks like bullshit kicking the arse of the hour to me.
|