Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Angelsmile -> Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 1:49:46 PM)

When someone kills a person he goes to jail and gets death penalty, when someone kills 11 people and thousands of innocent animals and attacks the shore of a continent he still runs around free. Where is democracy when large corporations are more powerful than US government ?

Why is the CEO of BP not in jail and still running around free ? Why is a company which has turned out to be incompetent in their business and killed life of people and wild life still allowed to be operating ? Why did they get even more licences to drill after they have clearly demonstrated their incompetence and irresponsibility ?

Is attacking an entire shore of the US and making sea animals people live of extinct not more of a crime and more of an act of  war then just destroying two twin towers ? If so why does the US not go to bomb the UK now for that oil attack if they bombed the Iraq for just two twin towers ?

How much the CEO of British Petroleum Tony Hayward "cares" (you will notice the wicked smile in his face during his speech) shows this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b6J7LRUTFY with the title: 

BP's CEO Tony Hayward: "We had too many people that were working to save the world."
 
Looks like Tony Hayward's objective is rather to destroy the world than to safe it and nobody is preventing him from doing so (saving the world is not what he is up to he said himself). So people wonder what kind of business this guy is running.

Did he ever say once "I am sorry" for all the people and animals who died and the famillies who will loose their existence because of him ? Did he ? I could not find a single "sorry" anywhere. But this article :  "Trying to shirk responsibility for spill, BP CEO predicts ‘lots of illegitimate’ lawsuits because ‘this is America.’  Hayward told Good Morning America, “This wasn’t our accident. … This was a drilling rig operated by another company. It was their people, their systems, their processes. We are not responsible for the accident.” So trying to get away with lies seems to be more "business like" to that guy than taking on responsability for his acts and clearing up the mess he caused.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/06/hayward-america-illegitimate/

 
Or this one: Tony Hayward, BP CEO: Gulf Oil Spill 'Relatively Tiny'
We can all see how tiny it is, its just the biggest pollution we ever had on our planet but for him its tiny.  M
aybe he meant by tiny his understanding of what he is actually doing and saying and his totally lacking sense of responsability and bad conscience. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/14/bp-ceo-gulf-oil-spill-rel_n_576215.html

Between the biggest environmental impact ever and a very modest, tiny impact lays indeed a very huge gap. So where comes reality into the game here ? If reality is still important for such a man.

Is this guy deliberately lieing or is he so far from reality / close to reality loss or is it that he just really doesn't know what he is talking about and has absolutely no clue of his business hence just saying things people would love to hear ? Then not caring about what he said and doing the opposite even of what he said. It looks like this guy couldn't care less !!!

Hayward told Fox News sister network Sky News that he is largely unconcerned: "I think the environmental impact of this disaster is likely to be very, very modest. It is impossible to say and we will mount, as part of the aftermath, a very detailed environmental assessment as we go forward. We’re going to do that with some of the science institutions in the U.S. But everything we can see at the moment suggests that the overall environmental impact of this will be very, very modest."
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/05/19/hayward-modest-oilpocalypse/

 
But who cares the cruelty, the suffering and dieing fishes and birds, who cares the cruelty ? Not him. The only thing which counts is: PROFIT
BP's Profit Ambitions: increase annual profits by more than $3 billion over the next several years and to expand production as much as two percent a year through 2015.  (and maybe cause more environmental desasters)
http://industry.bnet.com/energy/10003323/bps-profit-ambitions-an-oil-majors-guide-to-adding-another-3-billion-to-its-bottom-line/ 
 
"We had too many people who wanted to save the world" that clearly states what he is up to at least. So what sort of company is this man running ?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/bp-ceo-hayward-we-had-too_b_585610.html 

"Too bad Tony Hayward hadn't spent more time thinking about "saving the world." Maybe this disaster would have never happened if he had.
Too bad BP tried to pretend they were something they weren't because now not only is the public outraged, they don't trust a single thing the company has to say."

Do you believe them when they say that they will pay all "Legitimate Claims" ? They will never be able to pay for the extinction of all the sea animals which will have disappeared forever, they cannot, but they are still bratty.

BP Says It Will Pay All 'Legitimate Claims': What Does That Mean?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/24/bp-says-it-will-pay-all-l_n_587145.html 

First they said they will pay all damages caused, now they do the very contrary of what they said and try to limit their liabilities as much as they can (who cares the spilled oil when money is so much more important).  




A newspaper wrote : BP more powerful than US Government
 
The american authority EPA had asked BP to use less toxic agents than Corexit in the ocean to reduce the damages caused by it.
What BP answered regarding that official request to the said american authority was just: "No !"
 





BP kills all life in the ocean (all the warning signs before the explosion of the rig had been ignored said some articles) even though it is known that those chemical agents are only 50 - 60 % effective.
BP ran the risk to kill people even though it was known long before that there was something wrong with the rig but they just ignored it. Means they give a shit on people's life, they give a shit on ocean animals' life, they give a shit on what US government asks them to do, they just do as they please and get away with it.
 
Even though first BP said they will pay for all the damages caused, now they try everything to limit liability as much as possible. Looks like money is still more important than fixing that oil leakage. Looks like regarding the fixing of the leakage they couldn't care less. 





It clearly shows the aggressive attitude of BP when journalists and people with cameras are being chased away by employees of BP to avoid that pictures of the desaster can be spread in the media !
 
If they cared as much to fill that whole on the bottom of the sea as they do care about the limitation of their liabilities and preventing journalists and people with camaras from taking pictures of the desaster on site then the whole could have been filled a long time ago.
 
The article of this newspaper also stated that the company British Petrolium even offered contracts to the fishermen in which those fishermen are asked to abandon their rights of any future claims !!!!!
This says it all, so the statement that they will pay for all liabilities was a clear lie as they do the very opposite of what they had been saying before.





Furthermore that newspaper article stated that BP doesn't seem to care at all neither about the health hazards, to which the people who are helping with the desaster and the fishermen are exposed due to BP.
 
And found that in the internet too:
BP was key to the Libayan Terrorist that bombed the flight at Lockerbee be released so they could get at the millions of barrels there.

The oil companies have sworn that the shut off valves would work in such a catastrophe. None of the oil companies pay their fare share in corporate taxes. They have released 100s of thousands of gallons of crude into the oceans and fouled beaches from Gallapagos to Europe to Alaska. In the USA we have a 30 day supply of emergency oil. If for any of a number reasons the oil stops the USA economy and world economies come to a grinding halt. Last years run up in gas was because of market manipulation. Not one President has the guts to do what needs to be done and that is switch USA off oil Now. The Telsa electric car has proven beyond a shaddow of a doubt that electric cars work. We have no alternative fuel for jet airplanes and may need oil way into the future for that.
 
If you want to do something about it you will find many boycott initiatives, one of them is:  http://last-lost-empire.com/blog/?p=244 or http://boycottbp.org/why  many more of those boycott initiatives can be found by google search with the key words: BP boycott.




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 3:10:43 PM)

Also found this online:
The oil industry might drown Obama and his team

In: Politics22 May 2010
The popularity rating of US President Obama has already touched an all time low, like the European markets last month. The financial industry overhauling legislation and the ongoing high unemployment rate are expected to pull down his popularity further in the coming months.As if these are not enough, the crude oil spill in Gulf of Mexico is only adding to Obama’s woes. He has been warning the British Petroleum company almost every day for the last 20 days, but with every passing day the problem seems to be only growing.
(own annotation: Does anybody seriously believe that this CEO of British Petroleum Tony Haywards gives a shit on any warning from an US President or an US authority ?????? )
 
Now there are reports of a huge oil slick running into miles underneath the blast point, which is likely to reach the Gulf coast in the next few days. Also , the company is now sounding not so confident of plugging the leak even next week.
(own annotation: filling that whole will cost them money so why should they care to fill it ? )

All these could only spell more trouble for Obama. If the European crisis goes out of hand, and US again gets into another bout of recession, that could be the last nail in the coffin for the political career of Obama.
http://www.convr2009.com/




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 3:18:59 PM)

Spinning like BP did, might have appeared to pay off in the short-term, but in long run it gets you ads like this from Greenpeace:
[image]http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2010-05-21-bptonyhayward.jpg[/image]

Quote:
"It is clear that BP’s bright green logo has never matched the reality of the company. Since taking over in 2007 Tony Hayward has taken BP back to petroleum, chasing the last drops of oil from unconventional sources like the Canadian tar sands and deep water drilling in the Gulf of Mexico."




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 4:01:13 PM)

BP CEO Tony Hayward Says The Situation is Contained and BP is "good for the money".
quote:
Meanwhile, the Secretary of Energy Dr. Steven Chu announces on national television to Rachel Maddow that the only intelligence he receives is the following:  “I only know what I read in the papers.”  This begs the question as to why our Secretary of Energy is not aware of what is going on in the Gulf and what energy applications are being signed off on. 

Why has the United States government pushed these drilling applications through despite that it’s been clearly proven that the technology to deal with a oil leak at 5,000 feet does not exist.  Are the international community and the coastal states supposed to sit idly by while a solution is created and the coast is either being destroyed or is nearing said destruction? 

Additionally, Chu states that engineers aren’t even positive that the top-kill operation will work and that if not done correctly, it could make things worse.  To save face, he states that he believes all approvals for even deeper drilling should stop until this Deepwater Horizon leak is taken care of.  However, he informs Rachel Maddow as well as her viewers that something like this would most likely never happen again.
Instead of taking control of the situation, pushing British Petroleum out of the picture and taking the initiative that the United States has been known to do, the Obama administration and its supporters say that at least he’s responding.  Additionally, they continue to make comparisons of the Bush administrations response to Hurricane Katrina to the Obama administration responding immediately to the natural disaster that is Deepwater Horizon oil explosion.  Fishers along the coast have decided to take the situation into their own hands and have begun attempting to clean up what they can.  Considering that these fishers are now unemployed, thanks to British Petroleum, they are hoping that they can help clean up the spill before it completely engulfs their coastal regions.
 
Tony Hayward reassures the world that BP is “good for the cost of this”.  However, there is not enough money that BP can throw at the United States that will fix the irreplaceable marine and wildlife that lives along the coast.  Considering the cost of this clean up will can reach to the billions, BP may only have to pay the United States $75 million - which is less than half a percent of what this will cost the United States and American taxpayers to clean up the mess that British Petroleum initiated.  With thousands of fishers out of business, tourism along the coast dipping low because of closed beaches; the cost of BP’s folly continues to sky-rocket.  Sadly, BP cannot even reassure the United States as well as the international community that all is well or that all will be well in the near future.  

Considering that Tony Hayward has been given a 40% pay rise, one certainly hopes that BP is “good for it” and that their flowery promises are followed through on
 
(own annotation: note that instead of being laid off and sent to prison he gets a pay rise for this !!!)
 
http://www.examiner.com/x-50529-West-Palm-Beach-Public-Policy-Examiner~y2010m5d25-BP-CEO-Tony-Hayward-Says-The-Situation-is-Contained-and-BP-is-good-for-the-money




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 4:10:13 PM)

And another one:
Obama Received Thousands of Dollars from BP
May 26, 6:28 AM[image]http://image.examiner.com/img/greydot.gif[/image]Wilmington Conservative Examiner[image]http://image.examiner.com/img/greydot.gif[/image]Kevin WhitemanWell past a month since "Obama's Katrina", and many are still asking why precious little has been done by the Obama Administration in regards to its response to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Follow The Money
According to The Center for Responsive Politics, during the 2008 election cycle Obama was the top individual to receive contributions from British Petroleum (BP).
B.O. received $71,051 in contributions from the oil giant during his run for the White House.
Let's Keep This Train Wreck Moving
White House energy adviser Carol Browner made it clear who is running the show, "We have been in charge and we'll continue to be in charge." Commandant of the Coast Guard, Adm. Thad Allen told a White House briefing, "They are 5,000 feet down. BP or the private sector alone have the means to deal with that problem down there. It's not government equipment that is going to be used to do that." Admiral Allen went on to say, "They are the responsible party. But we have the authority to direct them." Thus far, Obama has yet to "direct them" or anyone else.
http://www.examiner.com/x-47869-Wilmington-Conservative-Examiner~y2010m5d26-Obama-Received-Thousands-of-Dollars-from-BP




Real0ne -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 4:10:40 PM)




the fox guarding the chicken house


TITLE 28 > PART VI > CHAPTER 176  > SUBCHAPTER A  > § 3002

§ 3002. Definitions

(10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe.


(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.





Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 4:29:21 PM)

And another:
Confidence in BP? Not really, Salazar says
Interior chief critical but other official says pushing BP aside not an option

[image]http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/100523_oil_pelican.h2.jpg[/image]
Patrick Semansky / AP
An oil-covered pelican joins others on an island in Barataria Bay off Louisiana on Sunday. The island is home to hundreds of nesting brown pelican as well as terns, gulls and roseate spoonbills. msnbc.com staff and news service reports ET May 23, 2010

Obama administration on Sunday said the oil giant had missed "deadline after deadline" in its efforts to seal the blownout oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. At a press conference outside BP America's Houston headquarters, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said he understood the challenges but was frustrated that BP had set deadlines that "have not been met."
 
Asked if he trusted BP, Salazar said that the company "from day one, frankly, has not fulfilled the mission it was supposed to fulfill."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37303793/ns/gulf_oil_spill/




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 4:39:34 PM)

McConnell doesn't think BP should pay for it all
Senate Minority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was on Meet The Press today, and he came right out of the gate trying to score political points on the Gulf oil by blaming the Obama administration for the incident, “the administration’s involvement in this will be a big part of the inquiry.” McConnell also stated his opposition to lifting the damages cap and making BP pay for everything.
http://www.politicususa.com/en/mcconnell-bp-obama





Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 4:48:44 PM)

And another one just found on this subject:

Get lost, BP: Obama should take over the gulf cleanup from this serial despoilerWednesday, May 26, 2010By Bob Herbert 
OLD SHELL BEACH, La. -- I asked the sheriff of St. Bernard Parish, Jack Stephens, if he was at all optimistic about BP stopping the gusher of oil that is fouling the Gulf of Mexico in time to prevent a long-term environmental catastrophe in the southern Louisiana wetlands. The sun was high in the sky, and the day was hot. The sheriff was in a small boat, patrolling the waterways that wend their way through the delicate marshes. He thought for a long moment. Oil was already seeping into the marshes, getting into the soil and plant life and coating some of the wildlife.

"I'll tell you the truth," Mr. Stephens said. "It may already be too late."
Traveling along the Gulf Coast, past idled boats with names like Big Shrimp and Blessed Assurance, past dead trees and hurricane fortifications and other signs of the area's perpetual vulnerability, you can't help but wonder how a company like BP, with its awful record of incompetence and irresponsibility, was ever allowed to drill for oil a mile deep in the Gulf of Mexico. It's not as if we didn't know that BP was a menace.
On March 23, 2005, a series of explosions and fires at the BP Texas City refinery killed 15 people and injured 180 others in what was described by investigators as "one of the worst industrial disasters in recent U.S. history." John Bresland, the chairman of the U.S. Chemical Safety Board, reminded us in March, on the fifth anniversary of the tragedy, that an intensive investigation by the board had "found organizational and safety deficiencies at all levels of the BP Corporation."

The Texas City conflagration was just part of BP's execrable pattern. On Oct. 25, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice issued the following announcement:
"British Petroleum and several of its subsidiaries have agreed to pay approximately $373 million in fines and restitution for environmental violations stemming from a fatal explosion at a Texas refinery in March 2005, leaks of crude oil from pipelines in Alaska, and fraud for conspiring to corner the market and manipulate the price of propane carried through Texas pipelines." Nice outfit, this BP. Anyone who thought this London-based wrecking crew gave a rat's whisker about harming the Gulf of Mexico or threatening the environment of the Louisiana wetlands -- or the livelihoods of families living here -- has been inhaling way too much of BP's toxic fumes.
Yet there was our government not only giving BP's reprobates the go-ahead to drill for oil a mile deep in the gulf but also handing them a waiver, allowing them to avoid a detailed analysis of the effect of their operations on the surrounding environment.
Giving an environmental waiver to a company as contemptuous of the environment as BP shows just whose side the government is on in the face-off between predatory giant corporations and the interests of ordinary American citizens.
BP got off much too easy with the fines it agreed to in 2007. And for some odd reason, it's being treated much too deferentially now. This crisis has gone on for more than a month, and neither BP nor the Obama administration seems to know what to do.
No one has a handle on how much oil is gushing out of control into the gulf. No one understands the environmental impact of the hundreds of thousands of gallons of chemical dispersants that BP is injecting into the gulf. No one has any idea how far this awful stain on the environment will spread.
President Barack Obama should have taken charge of the response to the oil spill -- which he called a "potentially unprecedented" environmental calamity -- from jump street. He should have called in the very best minds and operatives from the corporate and scientific worlds and imposed an emergency plan of action -- to be carried out by BP and all others who might be required. Instead, after all this time, after more than a month of BP's demonstrated incompetence, the administration continues to dither.
Incredibly, until The New York Times blew the whistle in an article on Monday, environmental waivers were still being offered for oil drilling in the gulf. What will it take for sanity to prevail? How many people have to die or face ruin, and how much of nature has to be despoiled, before we rein in the cowboys of these runaway corporations?
Steadily increasing numbers of anxiety-ridden coastal residents are watching not just their livelihoods but an entire way of life slip away. Even as BP's lawyers are consumed with the task of limiting the company's liability, the administration continues to insist it has little choice but to follow the company's lead in fighting the spill. That is dangerous nonsense.
Mr. Obama has an obligation to make it unmistakably clear that BP's interests are not the same as America's interests. He needs to stand shoulder to shoulder with the people who are taking the brunt of this latest corporate outrage. The oil has now stained nearly 70 miles of the Louisiana Coast. No one can say what terrible toll the gusher is taking in the depths of the gulf. And spreading right along with the oil is a pervasive and dismaying sense of helplessness from our leaders in Washington.
Bob Herbert is a syndicated columnist for The New York Times.Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10146/1060667-109.stm#ixzz0p59EaDSw
 




http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10146/1060667-109.stm




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 4:57:12 PM)

And another:
Video footage after the tube insertion shows oil continuing to billow from the broken pipe. According to CNN, Rep Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) told reporters: "I think now we are beginning to understand that we cannot trust BP."
"BP has lost all credibility. Now the decisions will have to be made by others, because it is clear that they have been hiding the actual consequences of this spill," he added.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/292306




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 5:08:42 PM)

And another one just found:
BP has made generous contributions to key candidates over the years. In the recent Presidential election campaign, BP related contributions of $77,000 went to the Obama campaign. This was the largest BP support of a candidate in the last 20 years. Ken Salazar when campaigning for the Senate received large support from BP. Obama appointed Senator Salazar as Secretary of The Interior. This position oversees oil drilling activity in the U.S. and in our offshore waters BP requested an exemption from the environmental safety study required before any drilling could take place in the Gulf. An exemption to this study was granted by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar with no objection offered by Obama. The environmental study is an extensive undertaking that takes about two years to complete and be approved before drilling can take place. Without Ken Salazar’s grant of an exemption the study would still be taking place and the current spill would not be happening.
Meanwhile the Obama administration through the U.S. Export Import Bank has guaranteed 10 Billion in loans for offshore oil exploration off the Coast of Brazil. This exploration will be conducted by Brazil’s state controlled oil company Petrobras. Petrobras is the single largest investment ($811 million) by the George Soros controlled hedge fund.
We all know that the billionaire George Soros has been the biggest financial supporter of Obama and this administration.
What do you think about all this. I am yet only able to give an astonished
Oh My-Oh My Is this the Change we were looking for?
http://www.bucksays.com/bp-obama-and-salazar-oil-relationships/




Politesub53 -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 5:22:29 PM)

You might be taken more seriously, if you had not said that the destruction of the twin towers was nothing compared to the oil spill.

I take it that in protest you have stopped using oil and any of its by products.




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 5:32:19 PM)

Picture showing the cruelty of that crime:
[image]http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/bilder/oelpest276_v-grossgalerie16x9.jpg[/image]
(Foto: AP)




Angelsmile -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 5:36:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

You might be taken more seriously, if you had not said that the destruction of the twin towers was nothing compared to the oil spill.

I take it that in protest you have stopped using oil and any of its by products.


You might be taken more seriously if you would think before you post:
- the twin towers were a locally very limited spot not the entire coast of a continent
- the fall down of the twin towers didn't pollute the whole planet
- the twin towers can be replaced by building them up again, but extincted wild life cannot ! All the dieing sea animals which become extinct will never return and cannot be replaced by any financial effort in the world.
- When oily rain will rain down on your salad and vegetables then you will understand why the impact of this is much more of a crime. And when people all over the world will die of  lung cancer from the oil in the air as the oil gazes will spread all over the planet.




Politesub53 -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 5:45:21 PM)

Are you serious ? Here you are, moaning about the oil spill, using a computer which no doubt has some plastics in it, which come from oil based products. I would also assume you use transport and live in a house, all of which has oil based products. So as bad as the oil spill is, it is our use of products derived from a need for oil which is partly to blame.  

Do you realise the local disaster of the twin towers ( your words ) killed thousands, and as a result sparked two invasions, killing hundreds of thousands, who cant be rebuilt. Thats no to mention the people who will get cancer from the building particles in the air, or the depleted uranium.

Sure, the deaths in the gulf and the serious effect on the enviroment is a disaster, but lets get things in perspective here.




Lucylastic -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 6:17:20 PM)

Id take you a little more seriously if you stopped using oil rain as a substance...it does not compute,
Neither do several size fonts, colours and random rants to really questionable sources.
Yes it is a fucking nightmare, yes BP should be hung drawn and quartered and made to pay every damn penny but puhleeeeeze stop expecting this to be cleared up with one simple solution, it aint gonna happen, or it already would have.




thompsonx -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 7:45:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Are you serious ? Here you are, moaning about the oil spill, using a computer which no doubt has some plastics in it, which come from oil based products. I would also assume you use transport and live in a house, all of which has oil based products. So as bad as the oil spill is, it is our use of products derived from a need for oil which is partly to blame.


For you to suggest that anyone's use of petroleum products should diminish their outrage at bp's cavalier attitude is beneath you.  

Do you realise the local disaster of the twin towers ( your words ) killed thousands, and as a result sparked two invasions,

To suggest that the twin towers sparked two invasions is pure sophistry. Greed and arrogance were the cause of the invasions.






SirPumpy -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/26/2010 10:17:03 PM)

I love BP, they make excellent hi octane fuels and oils and are the only products I use in my collection of gas guzzling big block V8's.

Their diesel fuel is also great for lighting my burnoff pile, the foam rubber couches and mattresses are a bugger to light when wet and ive run out of dead cats and truck tyres to keep it burning so im resorting to polystyrene and diesel.

BP solar also lead the world in alternative energy research and Im love them for that as well because these days the power companies pay me for the power I supply them.

British petroleum rock!




Politesub53 -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/27/2010 2:39:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Are you serious ? Here you are, moaning about the oil spill, using a computer which no doubt has some plastics in it, which come from oil based products. I would also assume you use transport and live in a house, all of which has oil based products. So as bad as the oil spill is, it is our use of products derived from a need for oil which is partly to blame.


For you to suggest that anyone's use of petroleum products should diminish their outrage at bp's cavalier attitude is beneath you.  

Do you realise the local disaster of the twin towers ( your words ) killed thousands, and as a result sparked two invasions,

To suggest that the twin towers sparked two invasions is pure sophistry. Greed and arrogance were the cause of the invasions.





I havent defended BP here, merely pointed out that as bad as the spill is, it isnt as bad as 9/11. Which Angel had posted on another thread. 

Sophistry, thats good coming from you Thompson. I have said in the past that I thought the Iraq invasion was more to do with controlling oil supplies than anything else. Afghanistan wasnt though. That was a direct result of 9/11. It was also 9/11 that gave Bush and Blair the excuse for the Iraq invasion.




Silence8 -> RE: Mission from Hell - BP's CEO T. Hayward: 'We had too many people that were working to save the world (5/27/2010 7:04:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Id take you a little more seriously if you stopped using oil rain as a substance...it does not compute,
Neither do several size fonts, colours and random rants to really questionable sources.
Yes it is a fucking nightmare, yes BP should be hung drawn and quartered and made to pay every damn penny but puhleeeeeze stop expecting this to be cleared up with one simple solution, it aint gonna happen, or it already would have.


Let's see here : criminal prosecution, no more offshore oil drilling, money for renewable alternatives, no more corn subsidies.

Well, four ain't bad.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125