Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

BP: How many times shall this happen over and over again ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> BP: How many times shall this happen over and over again ? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
BP: How many times shall this happen over and over again ? - 5/26/2010 7:04:34 PM   
Angelsmile


Posts: 113
Joined: 12/20/2005
Status: offline
Sunday, August 14, 2005PERMALINK Posted 12:54 PM by Jordan

Endless BP Accidents: Terrorist Plot?

BP Amoco refineries seem to be having so many accidents that I don't even report them all anymore. Some might say there's a problem with BP's "safety culture" or their management safety systems.

According to the
Galveston Daily News, the FBI suspects there may be more going on here than traditional money-saving, life-threatening short cuts, corner cutting, staff reductions and general negligence.

 
You don’t have to be a conspiracy buff to think the recent spate of incidents at BP facilities was maybe a little much to comfortably call coincidence.

The FBI’s not going near that, but did confirm it was conducting what it called routine investigations of the incidents.

Bureau officials said there was no evidence or indication that any of the incidents might involve deliberate acts, and that such probes had become routine since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

BP’s Texas City oil refinery and a subsidiary’s chemical plant at Chocolate Bayou have been at the center of six large incidents in the past 15 months.

Those include explosions in three separate cases, one of which had mass casualties. They also include a pipe rupture that killed two workers and severely injured a third, a late night leak of Gasoil that put a city under a shelter-in-place order and a large explosion and fire at the Innovene Chemical plant.

Special Agent Al Tribble said the bureau was looking into the incidents to see if there is a connection. He said the agency was involved not so much because there appears to be a link or evidence of wrongdoing, but because of the climate that has existed since the terror attacks of 9/11.
And it's true. Ever since 9/11, for example, the first agency on the scene -- even before OSHA or the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, is ATF: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives -- to rule out terrorism.

OK, you can laugh, but I think there's something here we can use. For example, isn't it possible that:

  • Repeal of the ergonomics standard which halted the battle atainst the epidemic of back injuries facing health care workers is really a terrorist plot to undermine our health car system in preparation for a bioterrorism attack?

  • The failure of OSHA, the EPA or Congress to ease the process of updating archaic standards toxic industrial chemicals is really a terrorist plot to spread cancer and other diseases through the American public, weakening our health and resolve?

I'm sure there are other examples. But I think the FBI should get busy investigating these plots and transport everyone responsible down to Gitmo.http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2005/08/endless-bp-accidents-terrorist-plot.html Sunday, August 13, 2006PERMALINK Posted 1:01 AM by Jordan

BP: Beyond Believable

As we've noted several times before, the giant oil company, BP (formerly British Petroleum and BP Amoco), seems to be having its share of problems lately, killing workers, leaking huge amounts of oil in Alaska, and failing to maintain its pipelines (as well as a little fraud and good old fashioned air pollution thrown in.) This is despite its nine-year old attempt to change its image to becoming a more environmentally conscious BP -- Beyond Petroleum.
New York Times business writer Joe Nocera notes that BP's attempt to promote its green image hasn't exactly fooled most environmentalistsNocera concedes that BP managers may sincerely believe in their "green" mission. But "walking the walk" seems a bit harder than "talking the talk"
I found plenty of people, with long experience in the oil patch, who are convinced that BP has long had a culture of corner-cutting that has led to its current problems. “It has to be systemic,” said Matthew R. Simmons, who runs an investment banking and consulting firm specializing in the oil industry. Mr. Simmons pointed out that whistle-blowers had been complaining for years about BP in Alaska.
And, he added, BP’s failure to inspect the pipeline by using a “pig”— a device that crawls through the pipeline taking X-ray-like pictures — was nothing short of negligence. “They found wall thicknesses that were down to four-tenths of an inch,” he said. “That is the thickness of a beer can.”

When I spoke to Mr. Dean of BP, he asserted that the company hadn’t used the pig because it thought that a newer technology, allowing the company to monitor the pipeline externally, was adequate. “We were shocked and dismayed,” he said. “We really felt we had a good inspection and monitoring program. We realize that we need to do better, and we will spare no expense to get it right.”
Mr. Dean, I have to say, came across as genuinely contrite; he must have said “We’re sorry” a half-dozen times in a 45-minute phone call. “This cuts to our core values,” he told me with considerable anguish. I got the strong impression, not just from him but from watching other BP officials on television this week, that the company really is determined to do whatever it can to fix the problems — and prevent them from happening again. Which is great, so far as it goes. And I give BP credit for acknowledging so forthrightly that it made mistakes. But in the meantime, BP is going to pass through a painful gantlet. It will undoubtedly be raked over the coals by Congress (hearings are set for early September); it will have its worst documents exposed in lawsuits; it will find itself under fierce regulatory scrutiny; and it will be accused, I’m sure, of the worst sort of corporate greed and hypocrisy. It’ll be a long time before anyone believes anything BP has to say about its environmental sensitivity.

I can’t say that my heart bleeds. If BP hadn’t been so holier than thou in its marketing these past years, I doubt that it would be getting hammered right now — at least to this extent. If there is one ironclad rule about marketing, it is that you had better be practicing internally what you are preaching to the world.

Let me put it another way: You can’t just talk the talk, you have to walk the walk.
A diary entry by Jorndorff at Daily Kos isn't quite so confident of BP's good intentions, pointing out that whistleblowers had raised questions about BP's pipeline maintenance two years ago. BP's decision to shut down Prudhoe Bay is said to have been due to its recent scrutiny of the pipeline. But back on March 15, shortly after the record pipeline leakage, the Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration mandated a thorough cleaning and "pigging" of its lines "in order to prevent and detect further corrosion."

In short, this discovery came (not through routine internal safety priorities) but only once such action was mandated by the federal government to ensure the integrity of the company's pipelines. The mandated Corrective Action Order gave the company a June 15 deadline to complete the cleaning of its lines. Not a single line was cleaned by the deadline. The delay is squarely the responsibility of BP, which claimed that "factors outside its control" prevented them to be able to clean its lines. Fingers were pointed at Alyeska Pipeline Company, which is partially owned by BP, for its refusal to allow pigging. BP contended that it would abide by the order, but that it would take approximately two years to complete all aspects.
 And even worse,




Chuck Hamel, longtime BP employee advocate, recently told NBC that "a dozen past and current BP employees came to him claiming they'd been told to cut back on a chemical put into the system to retard rust and corrosion, and to falsify records. A federal official confirms that many of these workers have also talked to the FBI."

Asked why BP would do such a thing, Hamel responded, "to save money."

Finally, noting Enron's manipulation of California's energy supply resulting in blackouts several years ago, and accusations that BP recently manipulated the propane market to jack up prices, the author wonders whether the current shutdown is purely accidental, given the increased profit BP will be making by the resulting rise in oil prices.
Nah.
http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2006/08/bp-beyond-believable.html
Tuesday, December 151152, 2006

PERMALINK Posted 10:38 PM by Jordan

BP Texas City: More Evidence That Neglegence Led To Explosion

The Wall St. Journal today reports on a series of internal "accountability reviews" of the 2005 explosion at BP's Texas City refinery that killed 15 workers and injured 180. The Chemical Safety Board reported earlier this year that cost-cutting at BP had contributed to the accident. The interviews cited by the Wall St. Journal seem to confirm those contentions.

BP had originally blamed the accident on workers' failure to follow procedures and reassigned the plant manager, Don Parus. Parus didn't have kind words for BP's upper management. Parus said he had been ordered to cut costs by 25% as recently as 2005, according to notes of an interview conducted Oct. 12.

He said he had given a slide show to [BP's global chief executive, John]Manzoni during a visit by the executive in July 2004 showing BP and Amoco had "underinvested" at Texas City for the previous 10 years, according to the interview notes. He said he pleaded for additional funds, citing problem areas such as the poor condition of equipment, and he said he had "exhausted every avenue he had to get the funds and it remained a no," according to the notes.

An attorney for Mr. Parus said his client stands by what he said in the interviews but wasn't available to comment. Ross Pillari, who stepped down as chief executive of BP's U.S. operations this year, said Texas City had been neglected, according to a BP interview on April 27. Senior BP-Amoco executives at the time of the merger "tried to squeeze as much out of [Texas City], so maintenance was neglected. The directive was to keep expenditures low because of 10 years of lousy refinery margins," according to a summary of his interview. Refinery margins are an industry measure of profitability. Mr. Pillari declined to comment. And BP CEO Lord Browne wasn't much help either:
In addition to BP's management structure, one executive also cited Lord Browne's attitude toward safety. In an interview conducted on June 21, Greg Coleman, who was vice president of BP's health, safety and environmental programs before he left the company, said Lord Browne "showed little interest" in safety and demonstrated "no passion, no curiosity, no interest" in safety issues, according to his interview notes.Poor Lord Browne, "repeatedly voted the best businessman in Britain." has had a very bad couple of years, according to Britain's Daily Telegraph, leading observers to wonder whether or not he will be able to stay on until his announced retirement date at the end of 2008:





The first signs that not all was well came in March, when 200,000 barrels of oil spilled onto the Prudhoe Bay tundra from a leaking pipeline. It appeared to be an isolated incident, but it set off a chain of events that led to the realisation that miles of pipes were dangerously corroded. In August, almost half the field had to be shut down.

BP faces a criminal investigation as well as inquiries by regulators and Congressional investigations into its maintenance record, amid allegations that the company neglected its infrastructure for years to boost profits.

In many aspects, what has happened in Alaska merely mirrored what was going on thousands of miles to the south in Texas City, where a refinery explosion killed 15 people and injured scores of others in 2005.

BP settled lawsuits with the families of those killed, but not before a report from the Chemical Safety Board catalogued years of unheeded warnings about the potential for disaster at the site. The regulator claimed that management was sub-standard, unsafe and antiquated equipment was not replaced and maintenance was deficient.

A website set up by lawyers for one of those whose parents were killed in the blast is publishing ever more damaging documents that show that
Lord Browne himself knew of the poor safety record at the refinery, where workers feared for their lives every day and where even its managers admitted equipment was patched together with "band aids and super glue".

But if those are the two incidents that have generated the most headlines, they merely head an ever growing list of problems filling Lord Browne's in-tray.

The company was forced to admit that production at its Thunderhorse platform in the Gulf of Mexico would have to be delayed again after more problems were discovered.

BP's trading operations face criminal and civil investigations into whether the company has purposely manipulated the crude oil, petrol and propane markets.

Just yesterday the company found itself on the wrong end of a Supreme Court ruling over royalty rates that could see it forced to pay millions of dollars, on top of $30m of back taxes.

That pales into insignificance compared with the $1.4bn tax bill BP's Russian joint venture was forced to pay the Kremlin this month. The Russian government, in a bid to exert its control over its energy resources, is also threatening to withdraw some of BP-TNK's licences, ostensibly on environmental grounds.

http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2006/12/bp-texas-city-more-evidence-that.html


British Petroleum (PLC) and John Browne: A Culture of Risk Beyond Petroleum
by Murray J. Bryant, Trevor Hunter
13 pages.  Publication date: Apr 23, 2008. Prod. #: 908M02-PDF-ENG

The year 2007 had to have been one of the worst in the history of British Petroleum plc (BP). In the span of four months, two separate independent reports (the first one commissioned by BP itself) had identified a deeply rooted "culture of risk" within BP where money and profits were valued above worker and environmental safety. These reports were in response to an explosion in 2005 at an oil refinery in Texas City, in the United States, which killed 15 people and injured more than 180, but the reports also referred to pipeline leaks in Alaska as well as other serious safety lapses throughout BP's global operations. The Texas City explosion was the worst but not the first major incident at a BP facility, and the revelations in the reports severely damaged the credibility the so-called super-major oil company had earned over the last decade. The job of restoring investor and stakeholder confidence as well as the firm's reputation fell to the BP board and its star group chief executive, Lord John Browne. The B case, product 908M03, examines the role played by the board with respect to the personal integrity of Lord Browne. The teaching objectives are to introduce students to examining the role of the board with respect to risk management as well as its social responsibilities to various stakeholders.
http://hbr.org/product/british-petroleum-plc-and-john-browne-a-culture-of/an/908M02-PDF-ENG

Friday, December 01, 2006PERMALINK Posted 12:12 AM by Jordan

BP: More Workplace Safety Problems



BP continues to have serious workplace safety problems. The giant petroleum company that killed 15 workers and injured 180 in an explosion at its Texas City refinery in 2005 has just confirmed two recent contractor fatalities.




The first fatality occurred on the Alaskan North Slope on Nov. 13, when a worker walking across a drill pad apparently fell, striking his head, said BP spokesman Ronnie Chappell.

The second man died Nov. 17, after the drilling of a well in Eastern Oklahoma had been completed. That contract worker was helping to prepare the rig to be moved when he also sustained a fatal head-injury.

The two accidents, which haven't been previously reported, follow a long chain of recent problems that include a major refinery explosion and a pair of major oil spills in Alaska.
All 15 fatalities in Texas City were also contractors.

Meanwhile, the company has also received $384,000 in fines from Indiana OSHA for safety violations at their refinery in Whiting, Indiana.




The office cited the British oil company for 14 violations, ranging from inadequate record-keeping to not correcting problems with relief-valve systems at the plant.

A BP spokesman said the company already has addressed more than half of the violations, none of which was the result of worker injury or environmental damage, and is working to resolve the rest.
BP received a 21.3 million penalty for violations relating to the Texas City explosion, and last April OSHA fined the company $2.4 million for violations at a Toledo, Ohio, refinery.
http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2006/12/bp-more-workplace-safety-problems.html

< Message edited by Angelsmile -- 5/26/2010 7:20:32 PM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: BP: How many times shall this happen over and over ... - 5/26/2010 7:06:35 PM   
Angelsmile


Posts: 113
Joined: 12/20/2005
Status: offline
British Petroleum tears down its infamous cancer factory near Chicago
May 10, 2010

Two decades after the mysterious deaths began occurring, former and current employees of BP Amoco’s research center in a Chicago suburb are still succumbing to a variety of horrifying cancers, including the deadly form of brain cancer called ‘glioma’ that has plagued white males who worked there.  Claiming that no solid link to the cancers has been found, BP Amoco has nevertheless decided to tear down the haunted Bldg 500 at its Naperville, Illinois campus after relocating 1200 employees to downtown Chicago.
That sounds like a good move because in 2008, this story was in the news:
WBBM:

Posted: Saturday, 02 August 2008 12:52AM
A Decade Later, Former (BP) Amoco Employees Continue To Die From Brain Cancer
NAPERVILLE — Ten years after lawsuits began pouring in against oil-giant BP Amoco regarding more than 20 employees of their Naperville research center developing a variety of deadly cancers, lawyers for the families of the victims think they are getting closer to a trial.
….
Employees of the center performed a number of scientific experiments using chemicals that are “known neurotoxins or carcinogens,” the suit alleged. Building 500, which has three wings connected to the research center, “consistently had problems in the air quality which caused employees to complain as early as the 1970s,” the suit said.
Paul Koning’s form of brain cancer was the most widespread type among employees in Building 500, according to Mrs. Koning’s lawyer Kenneth Lumb. Lumb’s firm, Corboy and Demetrio, has been representing cases regarding regarding Building 500 employees like Koning for ten years.
….
“It became abundantly clear that there was an excess of tumors found in employees at the facility in the mid-90s,” Lumb said.
The company was allegedly aware of the problem with ventilation and toxins in the 1970s, but failed to alert employees until the lawsuits began coming in 1998.
The company then hired researchers from the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Johns Hopkins University, who conducted what Lumb calls a “shallow and limited study” which only slightly acknowledged “part of the problem.”
That study found that the amount of gliomas, or brain cancer, recorded among white men who worked in the complex’s Building 503 was 15 times that of the general population, but did not address any other forms of cancer. BP Amoco has maintained that, aside from brain cancer, there was not significant rise in other cancers.
“We heartily disagree with that,” Lumb said. Former Building 500 employees have died of cancers in the liver, colon, bladder and a variety of brain cancers over the years.
At least seven former employees of the research center have died from a variety of cancers allegedly caused by toxins they were exposed to while working at the facility.
The third floor of a wing in Building 500 was closed down in 1996, about 20 years after original complaints were made, the suit said. The highest number of employees with cancerous tumors worked on that floor, Lumb said.
Lumb says his firm has been sorting through more than 600,000 pages of documents, many of which took ten years to obtain from the oil giant. After years of what he calls a “procedural battle,” Lumb thinks cases will start being tried as soon as next year.
BP Amoco settled suits with several families whose loved one’s died of cancer in 2000, but settlements have slowed, Lumb said….
Apparently British Petroleum is not eager to have its Illinois research center’s dark history of unsolved employee cancer puzzles in the public eye as it massively pollutes the Gulf of Mexico and U.S. coastal areas with toxic crude and dispersant chemicals.  The April 5 Naperville Sun’s coverage of the Building 500 demolition was removed from the Internet, but you can still read the cache here. At least the Daily Herald is maintaining its free speech status with this article.
This all paints a very grim future for the Gulf of Mexico.  It’s interesting that the chemical company that produces the dispersant chemical being used by BP and the Coast Guard in unprecedented amounts is headquartered in Naperville, Illinois along with BP’s infamous cancer factory.  And you can read here about the ties between Nalco, BP Amoco and Gulf Coast/Texas federal government entities. And with both BP and Nalco having such strong ties to the home city and state of Obama and high level White House staffers, it is not surprising that cleanup contracts got set up the way they have been. Nor it is a surprise that the Obama government granted BP a waiver in 2009 from doing an environmental impact statement on the oil rig now leaking in the Gulf.
[/link]
All right, show is over here. Head to the Gulf coast.It is not just the wildlife that are being protected if this [link=http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/05/05/chemical-detergents-gulf-oil-disaster/]FOX News article
is correct regarding use of Nalco’s secret blend of dispersant chemicals has been suspended for the time being.  (And maybe some of that dog hair can be put to use now.)
***BP has refused to stop using massive quantities of its chosen dispersant in the Gulf. They must have no reason to fear EPA sanctions.
http://thedailybite.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/britsh-petroleum-tears-down-its-infamous-cancer-factory-in-naperville/

< Message edited by Angelsmile -- 5/26/2010 7:11:31 PM >

(in reply to Angelsmile)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: BP: How many times shall this happen over and over ... - 5/26/2010 7:07:51 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline



how do you propose to solve it?






_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Angelsmile)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: BP: How many times shall this happen over and over ... - 5/26/2010 7:27:55 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
Drill baby drill..

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: BP: How many times shall this happen over and over ... - 5/26/2010 7:44:35 PM   
Angelsmile


Posts: 113
Joined: 12/20/2005
Status: offline
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xCZx7xdAcs8J:www.truthout.org/how-bushs-doj-killed-a-criminal-probe-into-bp-that-threatened-net-top-officials59648+BP+Beyond+prosecution&cd=7&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: BP: How many times shall this happen over and over ... - 5/26/2010 10:21:06 PM   
SirPumpy


Posts: 219
Joined: 9/26/2007
From: Country Victoria, Orstraliya
Status: offline
If you wear synthetic clothes, drive or own a car, bike or scooter, buy food from a store or own anything plastic like your computer then you are a hypocrite angelsmile.

And i think that one thread with all the crap in it would have been far more polite than spamming CM with multiple lunatic rants.

(in reply to Angelsmile)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: BP: How many times shall this happen over and over ... - 5/26/2010 11:34:48 PM   
shivermetimbers


Posts: 2060
Joined: 6/7/2008
Status: offline
I didn't want to quote most, if not all of your OP. So I'll simply answer your question with another question, but don't read into it:

How many times shall this happen over and over again?

Well, how many times has it happened so far?

_____________________________

I love you Deanna, you make every day a better day.

If we descended from monkeys and apes, why are there still monkeys and apes?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ3CJi0Ih9s&feature=player_embedded

http://www.thebuccozone.com/piratesong.htm

(in reply to Angelsmile)
Profile   Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> BP: How many times shall this happen over and over again ? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078