Angelsmile
Posts: 113
Joined: 12/20/2005 Status: offline
|
Sunday, August 14, 2005PERMALINK Posted 12:54 PM by Jordan Endless BP Accidents: Terrorist Plot? BP Amoco refineries seem to be having so many accidents that I don't even report them all anymore. Some might say there's a problem with BP's "safety culture" or their management safety systems. According to the Galveston Daily News, the FBI suspects there may be more going on here than traditional money-saving, life-threatening short cuts, corner cutting, staff reductions and general negligence. You don’t have to be a conspiracy buff to think the recent spate of incidents at BP facilities was maybe a little much to comfortably call coincidence. The FBI’s not going near that, but did confirm it was conducting what it called routine investigations of the incidents. Bureau officials said there was no evidence or indication that any of the incidents might involve deliberate acts, and that such probes had become routine since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. BP’s Texas City oil refinery and a subsidiary’s chemical plant at Chocolate Bayou have been at the center of six large incidents in the past 15 months. Those include explosions in three separate cases, one of which had mass casualties. They also include a pipe rupture that killed two workers and severely injured a third, a late night leak of Gasoil that put a city under a shelter-in-place order and a large explosion and fire at the Innovene Chemical plant. Special Agent Al Tribble said the bureau was looking into the incidents to see if there is a connection. He said the agency was involved not so much because there appears to be a link or evidence of wrongdoing, but because of the climate that has existed since the terror attacks of 9/11.And it's true. Ever since 9/11, for example, the first agency on the scene -- even before OSHA or the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, is ATF: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives -- to rule out terrorism. OK, you can laugh, but I think there's something here we can use. For example, isn't it possible that: - Repeal of the ergonomics standard which halted the battle atainst the epidemic of back injuries facing health care workers is really a terrorist plot to undermine our health car system in preparation for a bioterrorism attack?
- The failure of OSHA, the EPA or Congress to ease the process of updating archaic standards toxic industrial chemicals is really a terrorist plot to spread cancer and other diseases through the American public, weakening our health and resolve?
I'm sure there are other examples. But I think the FBI should get busy investigating these plots and transport everyone responsible down to Gitmo.http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2005/08/endless-bp-accidents-terrorist-plot.html Sunday, August 13, 2006PERMALINK Posted 1:01 AM by Jordan BP: Beyond Believable As we've noted several times before, the giant oil company, BP (formerly British Petroleum and BP Amoco), seems to be having its share of problems lately, killing workers, leaking huge amounts of oil in Alaska, and failing to maintain its pipelines (as well as a little fraud and good old fashioned air pollution thrown in.) This is despite its nine-year old attempt to change its image to becoming a more environmentally conscious BP -- Beyond Petroleum. New York Times business writer Joe Nocera notes that BP's attempt to promote its green image hasn't exactly fooled most environmentalistsNocera concedes that BP managers may sincerely believe in their "green" mission. But "walking the walk" seems a bit harder than "talking the talk" I found plenty of people, with long experience in the oil patch, who are convinced that BP has long had a culture of corner-cutting that has led to its current problems. “It has to be systemic,” said Matthew R. Simmons, who runs an investment banking and consulting firm specializing in the oil industry. Mr. Simmons pointed out that whistle-blowers had been complaining for years about BP in Alaska. And, he added, BP’s failure to inspect the pipeline by using a “pig”— a device that crawls through the pipeline taking X-ray-like pictures — was nothing short of negligence. “They found wall thicknesses that were down to four-tenths of an inch,” he said. “That is the thickness of a beer can.” When I spoke to Mr. Dean of BP, he asserted that the company hadn’t used the pig because it thought that a newer technology, allowing the company to monitor the pipeline externally, was adequate. “We were shocked and dismayed,” he said. “We really felt we had a good inspection and monitoring program. We realize that we need to do better, and we will spare no expense to get it right.” Mr. Dean, I have to say, came across as genuinely contrite; he must have said “We’re sorry” a half-dozen times in a 45-minute phone call. “This cuts to our core values,” he told me with considerable anguish. I got the strong impression, not just from him but from watching other BP officials on television this week, that the company really is determined to do whatever it can to fix the problems — and prevent them from happening again. Which is great, so far as it goes. And I give BP credit for acknowledging so forthrightly that it made mistakes. But in the meantime, BP is going to pass through a painful gantlet. It will undoubtedly be raked over the coals by Congress (hearings are set for early September); it will have its worst documents exposed in lawsuits; it will find itself under fierce regulatory scrutiny; and it will be accused, I’m sure, of the worst sort of corporate greed and hypocrisy. It’ll be a long time before anyone believes anything BP has to say about its environmental sensitivity. I can’t say that my heart bleeds. If BP hadn’t been so holier than thou in its marketing these past years, I doubt that it would be getting hammered right now — at least to this extent. If there is one ironclad rule about marketing, it is that you had better be practicing internally what you are preaching to the world. Let me put it another way: You can’t just talk the talk, you have to walk the walk. A diary entry by Jorndorff at Daily Kos isn't quite so confident of BP's good intentions, pointing out that whistleblowers had raised questions about BP's pipeline maintenance two years ago. BP's decision to shut down Prudhoe Bay is said to have been due to its recent scrutiny of the pipeline. But back on March 15, shortly after the record pipeline leakage, the Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration mandated a thorough cleaning and "pigging" of its lines "in order to prevent and detect further corrosion." In short, this discovery came (not through routine internal safety priorities) but only once such action was mandated by the federal government to ensure the integrity of the company's pipelines. The mandated Corrective Action Order gave the company a June 15 deadline to complete the cleaning of its lines. Not a single line was cleaned by the deadline. The delay is squarely the responsibility of BP, which claimed that "factors outside its control" prevented them to be able to clean its lines. Fingers were pointed at Alyeska Pipeline Company, which is partially owned by BP, for its refusal to allow pigging. BP contended that it would abide by the order, but that it would take approximately two years to complete all aspects. And even worse, Chuck Hamel, longtime BP employee advocate, recently told NBC that "a dozen past and current BP employees came to him claiming they'd been told to cut back on a chemical put into the system to retard rust and corrosion, and to falsify records. A federal official confirms that many of these workers have also talked to the FBI." Asked why BP would do such a thing, Hamel responded, "to save money." Finally, noting Enron's manipulation of California's energy supply resulting in blackouts several years ago, and accusations that BP recently manipulated the propane market to jack up prices, the author wonders whether the current shutdown is purely accidental, given the increased profit BP will be making by the resulting rise in oil prices. Nah. http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2006/08/bp-beyond-believable.html Tuesday, December 151152, 2006 PERMALINK Posted 10:38 PM by Jordan BP Texas City: More Evidence That Neglegence Led To Explosion The Wall St. Journal today reports on a series of internal "accountability reviews" of the 2005 explosion at BP's Texas City refinery that killed 15 workers and injured 180. The Chemical Safety Board reported earlier this year that cost-cutting at BP had contributed to the accident. The interviews cited by the Wall St. Journal seem to confirm those contentions. BP had originally blamed the accident on workers' failure to follow procedures and reassigned the plant manager, Don Parus. Parus didn't have kind words for BP's upper management. Parus said he had been ordered to cut costs by 25% as recently as 2005, according to notes of an interview conducted Oct. 12. He said he had given a slide show to [BP's global chief executive, John]Manzoni during a visit by the executive in July 2004 showing BP and Amoco had "underinvested" at Texas City for the previous 10 years, according to the interview notes. He said he pleaded for additional funds, citing problem areas such as the poor condition of equipment, and he said he had "exhausted every avenue he had to get the funds and it remained a no," according to the notes. An attorney for Mr. Parus said his client stands by what he said in the interviews but wasn't available to comment. Ross Pillari, who stepped down as chief executive of BP's U.S. operations this year, said Texas City had been neglected, according to a BP interview on April 27. Senior BP-Amoco executives at the time of the merger "tried to squeeze as much out of [Texas City], so maintenance was neglected. The directive was to keep expenditures low because of 10 years of lousy refinery margins," according to a summary of his interview. Refinery margins are an industry measure of profitability. Mr. Pillari declined to comment. And BP CEO Lord Browne wasn't much help either: In addition to BP's management structure, one executive also cited Lord Browne's attitude toward safety. In an interview conducted on June 21, Greg Coleman, who was vice president of BP's health, safety and environmental programs before he left the company, said Lord Browne "showed little interest" in safety and demonstrated "no passion, no curiosity, no interest" in safety issues, according to his interview notes.Poor Lord Browne, "repeatedly voted the best businessman in Britain." has had a very bad couple of years, according to Britain's Daily Telegraph, leading observers to wonder whether or not he will be able to stay on until his announced retirement date at the end of 2008: The first signs that not all was well came in March, when 200,000 barrels of oil spilled onto the Prudhoe Bay tundra from a leaking pipeline. It appeared to be an isolated incident, but it set off a chain of events that led to the realisation that miles of pipes were dangerously corroded. In August, almost half the field had to be shut down. BP faces a criminal investigation as well as inquiries by regulators and Congressional investigations into its maintenance record, amid allegations that the company neglected its infrastructure for years to boost profits. In many aspects, what has happened in Alaska merely mirrored what was going on thousands of miles to the south in Texas City, where a refinery explosion killed 15 people and injured scores of others in 2005. BP settled lawsuits with the families of those killed, but not before a report from the Chemical Safety Board catalogued years of unheeded warnings about the potential for disaster at the site. The regulator claimed that management was sub-standard, unsafe and antiquated equipment was not replaced and maintenance was deficient. A website set up by lawyers for one of those whose parents were killed in the blast is publishing ever more damaging documents that show that Lord Browne himself knew of the poor safety record at the refinery, where workers feared for their lives every day and where even its managers admitted equipment was patched together with "band aids and super glue". But if those are the two incidents that have generated the most headlines, they merely head an ever growing list of problems filling Lord Browne's in-tray. The company was forced to admit that production at its Thunderhorse platform in the Gulf of Mexico would have to be delayed again after more problems were discovered. BP's trading operations face criminal and civil investigations into whether the company has purposely manipulated the crude oil, petrol and propane markets. Just yesterday the company found itself on the wrong end of a Supreme Court ruling over royalty rates that could see it forced to pay millions of dollars, on top of $30m of back taxes. That pales into insignificance compared with the $1.4bn tax bill BP's Russian joint venture was forced to pay the Kremlin this month. The Russian government, in a bid to exert its control over its energy resources, is also threatening to withdraw some of BP-TNK's licences, ostensibly on environmental grounds. http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2006/12/bp-texas-city-more-evidence-that.html British Petroleum (PLC) and John Browne: A Culture of Risk Beyond Petroleum by Murray J. Bryant, Trevor Hunter 13 pages. Publication date: Apr 23, 2008. Prod. #: 908M02-PDF-ENG The year 2007 had to have been one of the worst in the history of British Petroleum plc (BP). In the span of four months, two separate independent reports (the first one commissioned by BP itself) had identified a deeply rooted "culture of risk" within BP where money and profits were valued above worker and environmental safety. These reports were in response to an explosion in 2005 at an oil refinery in Texas City, in the United States, which killed 15 people and injured more than 180, but the reports also referred to pipeline leaks in Alaska as well as other serious safety lapses throughout BP's global operations. The Texas City explosion was the worst but not the first major incident at a BP facility, and the revelations in the reports severely damaged the credibility the so-called super-major oil company had earned over the last decade. The job of restoring investor and stakeholder confidence as well as the firm's reputation fell to the BP board and its star group chief executive, Lord John Browne. The B case, product 908M03, examines the role played by the board with respect to the personal integrity of Lord Browne. The teaching objectives are to introduce students to examining the role of the board with respect to risk management as well as its social responsibilities to various stakeholders. http://hbr.org/product/british-petroleum-plc-and-john-browne-a-culture-of/an/908M02-PDF-ENG Friday, December 01, 2006PERMALINK Posted 12:12 AM by Jordan  BP: More Workplace Safety Problems BP continues to have serious workplace safety problems. The giant petroleum company that killed 15 workers and injured 180 in an explosion at its Texas City refinery in 2005 has just confirmed two recent contractor fatalities. The first fatality occurred on the Alaskan North Slope on Nov. 13, when a worker walking across a drill pad apparently fell, striking his head, said BP spokesman Ronnie Chappell. The second man died Nov. 17, after the drilling of a well in Eastern Oklahoma had been completed. That contract worker was helping to prepare the rig to be moved when he also sustained a fatal head-injury. The two accidents, which haven't been previously reported, follow a long chain of recent problems that include a major refinery explosion and a pair of major oil spills in Alaska. All 15 fatalities in Texas City were also contractors. Meanwhile, the company has also received $384,000 in fines from Indiana OSHA for safety violations at their refinery in Whiting, Indiana. The office cited the British oil company for 14 violations, ranging from inadequate record-keeping to not correcting problems with relief-valve systems at the plant. A BP spokesman said the company already has addressed more than half of the violations, none of which was the result of worker injury or environmental damage, and is working to resolve the rest. BP received a 21.3 million penalty for violations relating to the Texas City explosion, and last April OSHA fined the company $2.4 million for violations at a Toledo, Ohio, refinery. http://spewingforth.blogspot.com/2006/12/bp-more-workplace-safety-problems.html
< Message edited by Angelsmile -- 5/26/2010 7:20:32 PM >
|