Thank you, Tea Party.

Thank you, Tea Party. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

DarkSteven -> Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 7:40:40 AM)
The GOP was hoping to run as the party of outsiders. But the Tea Partiers have stolen that from them, and rightly. It wasn't too long ago that the GOP was actively screwing this country up - now they're pretending that things were great until Obama took office, and then everything went downhill. So the GOP is being labeled as part of the current mess in primaries by the Tea Partiers, who for anything you think about them genuinely ARE outsiders. It's becoming obvious that incumbency is now a big liability. I'm hoping that whomever gets elected will have no party loyalty whatsoever and will simply work for whatever is in their opinion best for the American people. While I do not agree with the Tea Partiers on everything, I do believe in fiscal sanity. And I do believe that Washington has become deaf, and that the Tea party is an excellent means of ensuring that Washington gets forced to listen. And they're breaking down party affiliation within the GOP as well. [:)]

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 7:54:44 AM)
quote: I do believe in fiscal sanity. And you also think Obama is handling things just fine. Interesting. Very interesting.

DarkSteven -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:31:12 AM)
sigh. What I meant in that comment from another thread was that I don't think that his lack of experience in an issue, that he is not overmatched. I did NOT intend to say that I agree with all his stands, and I stated it as such.

pahunkboy -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:33:12 AM)
The danger is that the tea party - the results end up to be neocons. I seen that show and it aint good.

Louve00 -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:35:03 AM)
Ya know, I hate assumptions. I read no where in the OP that Obama was handling everything just fine, fiscally. I did read that he said the GOP was pretending that things were great until Obama took office, and then everything went downhill. So do you think Obama was handling everything just fine, fiscally = the GOP was pretending that things were great until Obama took office, and then everything went downhill? This is what I mean by reading comprehension [8\|]

thishereboi -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:35:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy The danger is that the tea party - the results end up to be neocons. I seen that show and it aint good. Tell me hunky, what exactly is a neocon...in your own words?

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:36:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven sigh. What I meant in that comment from another thread was that I don't think that his lack of experience in an issue, that he is not overmatched. I did NOT intend to say that I agree with all his stands, and I stated it as such. What you said was that you believe in fiscal sanity, and that Obama is handling things just fine. What I said was: interesting. Are you now denying that he is handling things just fine, or are you saying he has exemplified fiscal sanity? Just to be clear, (to use an Obamaoesque phrase) I think that drone attacks are the only thing I would characterize as having been handled "just fine"; and his past, present, and projected spending are utterly insane.

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:40:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Louve00 Ya know, I hate assumptions. I read no where in the OP that Obama was handling everything just fine, fiscally. I did read that he said the GOP was pretending that things were great until Obama took office, and then everything went downhill. So do you think Obama was handling everything just fine, fiscally = the GOP was pretending that things were great until Obama took office, and then everything went downhill? This is what I mean by reading comprehension [8\|] As DS made clear in post #3, I was referring to another thread in which he made the statement Obamao was "handling things just fine" I guess you assumed I had no basis for my comment. Sigh. [;)]

pahunkboy -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:42:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy The danger is that the tea party - the results end up to be neocons. I seen that show and it aint good. Tell me hunky, what exactly is a neocon...in your own words? A neocon is mostly a neolib- but more uptight about sex. Both neos love endless wars and bow to the federal reserve= which funds both sides of all wars.

Louve00 -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:45:06 AM)
No, I was making no assumptions. I answered on this thread based on what I read on this thread. I still didn't see, nor have I ever saw where DS was ever in full agreement fiscally or any other way with this administration. I see him as agreeing with some things and not agreeing with others. This is exactly what DS said in THIS OP...While I do not agree with the Tea Partiers on everything, I do believe in fiscal sanity. And I do believe that Washington has become deaf, and that the Tea party is an excellent means of ensuring that Washington gets forced to listen. And they're breaking down party affiliation within the GOP as well. And this is a far cry from saying he agrees with the fiscal sanity of this administration. Wouldn't you say? [;)]

Musicmystery -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:45:50 AM)
quote: What you said was that you believe in fiscal sanity, and that Obama is handling things just fine. What I said was: interesting. That's not even close to what he said. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3227698 He clarifies, and you repeat the misunderstanding. Interesting. quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy The danger is that the tea party - the results end up to be neocons. I seen that show and it aint good. Exactly. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3224587

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:55:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: What you said was that you believe in fiscal sanity, and that Obama is handling things just fine. What I said was: interesting. That's not even close to what he said. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3227698 He clarifies, and you repeat the misunderstanding. Interesting. quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy The danger is that the tea party - the results end up to be neocons. I seen that show and it aint good. Exactly. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3224587 Nice try. But. Wrong. As DarkSteven himself made clear, he made the comment in another thread.Post #11 Happy now?

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:56:35 AM)
I love it when you admit you were wrong. [:)]

Musicmystery -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 8:56:56 AM)
quote: Nice try. But. Wrong. As DarkSteven himself made clear, he made the comment in another thread.Post #11 Happy now? Then go fucking talk to him in the other thread. Duh.

Louve00 -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 9:06:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave I love it when you admit you were wrong. [:)] As I said (and I will be clearer so you understand lol) you must have a reading comprehension deficit. So I guess I will have to overlook you.

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 9:25:35 AM)
quote: Then go fucking talk to him in the other thread. Duh. Two posts. Two threads. I combined them and addresed them in one thread. Duh. I love it when you admit you're wrong though.

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 9:28:34 AM)
quote: It's becoming obvious that incumbency is now a big liability. That's one take on it. My take on it is that the most fiscally conservative candidate has the wind in his sails. Ds and RINOs are in trouble As is the Obamao agenda. Wait. Except for Massachusetts. Incumbency was the problem there fer sure.

Musicmystery -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 9:29:20 AM)
I'm sorry the concept of separate threads for separate topics challenges you. In any event, the rest of us get it, hence the criticism of your harping on the OP erroneously.

truckinslave -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 9:31:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery I'm sorry the concept of separate threads for separate topics challenges you. In any event, the rest of us get it, hence the criticism of your harping on the OP erroneously. Can you introduce me to Jay? Leno?

Musicmystery -> RE: Thank you, Tea Party. (5/28/2010 9:35:15 AM)
See, this is just as I pointed out earlier. When discussions turn to an issue, you can't address it, but have only jibes. It's why we don't take you seriously. You've nothing to say.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875