RE: Forget the Cadillac

RE: Forget the Cadillac (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: Forget the Cadillac (5/30/2010 7:09:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: They should put her ass behind bars.....Wait! That would cost the taxpayers an additional 40-50k a year. Well if you sent her to california we could incarcerate her for a mear $23,000 per year for her $14,000 per year crime. You didn't read the article did you? This happened in CA. Are you reading impaired? Tangela Ridgeway was the lady that dick cited who lives in cerritos california which is about 60 miles from where I live. Did you really think I did not know that. My reference was to domiguy and the lady in question was one Alicia Garcia. Domiguy lives in chicago and was quoting prices for incarceration in illinois. In your rush to find fault with me you might try to find fault with my facts and not with what you wish I had said.

thompsonx -> RE: Forget the Cadillac (5/30/2010 7:13:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: eyesopened quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Apples to oranges. No fraud should ever be ignored, on any level. Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies? Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud. So you believe we should just ignore crimes if the profit is below a certain level? How much can I steal from your house before you think the law should come after me? Just steal his stuff under a value of $400. But you can rob him every year up to $400, as long as it isn't a firearm, a chicken, horse or goat, one of his cheaper koi fish, some piece of crap vehicle or anything he's carrying on his person. You can take all the loose change in the Sparkletts water bottle. He won't care. You're not big enough to worry about. Are you reading impaired? I said: Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies? Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud. Please tell me what part of limited did you not understand. How does the above equate with aproving of fraud.

thompsonx -> RE: Forget the Cadillac (5/30/2010 7:16:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: Garcia allegedly received more than $136,000 in public assistance benefits from January 2002 to April 2010." $136,000/99months = $1,373 per month. If I were hustling dead aluminum cans that is about a pound a day...bitch is obviously livin' large on the tax payers nickle. How much did adm get in subsidies last year? Yeah lets chase down all dem scheeming bitches and leave bill gates and ted turnover alone. It's probably close to $1373/mo times 12,000,000. Yes, I really do think illegal immigration costs this country more than a trillion per year. That is only because you are ignorant or a bigot or both

thompsonx -> RE: Forget the Cadillac (5/30/2010 7:19:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Apples to oranges. No fraud should ever be ignored, on any level. Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies? Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud. So you believe we should just ignore crimes if the profit is below a certain level? How much can I steal from your house before you think the law should come after me? Are you reading impaired? I said: Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies? Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud. Please tell me what part of limited did you not understand. How does the above equate with aproving of fraud.

thompsonx -> RE: Forget the Cadillac (5/30/2010 7:23:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Apples to oranges. No fraud should ever be ignored, on any level. Are you reading impaired? My bad you have already admitted you are. I said: Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies? Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud. Please tell me what part of limited did you not understand. How does the above equate with aproving of fraud.

tazzygirl -> RE: Forget the Cadillac (5/30/2010 7:41:07 PM)
At least im not repeating myself. Nor did i speak of approving of any fraud. A bit of your own reading impairment there.... boy! [;)]

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125