UtopianRanger
Posts: 3251
Status: offline
|
quote:
Actually that isn't true---without a lease, a landlord has the right to do anything they please--and if windy pushes it by staying beyond, the landlord has the right to a seizure of her possessions and put them on the curb--however, most landlords will give a 30 day notice, BUT she did get a notice--the best I can say is, lesson learned, start packing, get some friends to help---buy the beer and move on-- Actually even if the lease is up and a new one isn't signed, {and has collected any money at all since the lease ended} but the landlord reverts back to collecting rent on a month to month basis, you would still have an enforceable oral agreement. And with such an oral agreement, the tenant still has certain rights based on the particular state's laws. In any case.... I don't believe the landlord could forcibly evict someone and seize their property without due process. It wasn't but a year ago that it cost me eleven-hundred dollars in attorney’s fees and four months unpaid rent, before the court and local sheriff gave a former renter of mine a seventy-two hour notice before forcible removal. I think you'll find in most states, the playing field offers a disproportionate advantage to the renter. At least that's the case in both Oregon and California. - R Edited to add : I know we have at least two former attorneys - Please enlighten us here! LMAO!
< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 4/10/2006 4:39:44 PM >
_____________________________
"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired." -General George S. Patton
|