pahunkboy
Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006 From: Central Pennsylvania Status: offline
|
Spin off of the circumcision thread. The perils of a new puritanism. Would that occur? How extreme would it be? Here are some comments: quote:
ORIGINAL: Rule quote:
ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Rule, I am not sure I am looking forward to that. When a society goes thu that type of puritanism- gays, and others get clobbered. There are love-driven gays and there are lust driven pseudo-gays. The latter have far more to fear from sexually transmitted diseases than the former. That said, in evolution biology the existence of homosexual people has been a mind boggling mystery. I have spent many years towards solving that mystery, pondering and pondering possibilities. There are various evolutionary advantages to having homosexuals in one's population. Eventually I solved this problem: the primary advantage for having homosexuals in a population is that they are vectors for sexually transmitted diseases. It sucks for the homosexual men - but by being such vectors they benefit their population. So I say: value and respect your homosexuals. Whereas Abrahamic Jews (There are other genuine Jews) because of being on the wrong evolutionary track and greatly fearing the sexually transmitted diseases that threaten them, are apt to murder their homosexuals. I also suspect another manifestation of Murphy's Law here: it is my - unproven - impression that there are dis-proportionally large numbers of lust-driven pseudo-homosexuals in populations that circumcise. A consequence of the evolution algorithm trying to oppose the abnormal practice of circumcision, I suspect.
|