quote:

Antiboycott Laws:


During the mid-1970's the United States adopted two laws that seek to counteract the participation of U.S. citizens in other nation's economic boycotts or embargoes. These "antiboycott" laws are the 1977 amendments to the Export Administration Act (EAA) and the Ribicoff Amendment to the 1976 Tax Reform Act (TRA). While these laws share a common purpose, there are distinctions in their administration.


Who Is Covered by the Laws?

The antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) apply to the activities of U.S. persons in the interstate or foreign commerce of the United States. The term "U.S. person" includes all individuals, corporations and unincorporated associations resident in the United States, including the permanent domestic affiliates of foreign concerns. U.S. persons also include U.S. citizens abroad (except when they reside abroad and are employed by non-U.S. persons) and the controlled in fact affiliates of domestic concerns. The test for "controlled in fact" is the ability to establish the general policies or to control the day to day operations of the foreign affiliate.

quote:


Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the feds as an "individual entity, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct.

quote:

ORIGINAL: realcoolhand

Very interesting stuff you found there. May well be that it's like the flag code at Title 4 of the U.S. Code and it's not really a big deal. In any case, I'd love the time to read a little more.

quote:

ORIGINAL: RealOne


Hey leftie rightees!

Hows that freedom stuff working out for ya?

[image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stuff/Image8.jpg[/image]

quote:


Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the feds as an "individual entity, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: realcoolhand

Very interesting stuff you found there. May well be that it's like the flag code at Title 4 of the U.S. Code and it's not really a big deal. In any case, I'd love the time to read a little more.

come on man.  Thats what the bitch has been ever since 1933.  We have a battle flag under the executive branch flying in our courts.  They are a foreign jurisdiction.  Had the freemen not screwed up and tried to start their own bank it would be a very different world today.  Under th elaw of the flag it is a sign of whos law is being used in any contract being made.