pollux
Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne i was reading another post which prompted a couple thoughts. The post i read was about the difficulties one guy had or has maintaining fidelity to his partner because of his desire to explore his bdsm "NEEDS". Is this any different than looking at Maryjane next door who has bigger hooters than his wife so now he "needs" to play with them? How about Maryjane wears a leather mini skirt too, so he has a deep rooted "need" that goes to his core driving him to pursue the leather mini skirt lifestyle with Maryjane? Whats the difference between pursuing Maryjane or pursuing BDSM? RealOne: I think to be fair to the poster you are alluding to (at least who I think you're alluding to), you might mention that the person didn't say it was difficult to remain faithful. He was completely faithful and didn't have a hard time with that. What he was really having difficulty with was relating to his own kink. *That* was the problem, not the temptation to infidelity. My personal belief is if you're in a committed relationship, and you haven't obtained consent from your partner to be intimate with someone else outside it, nothing justifies cheating. That's *my* morality, though, and I'm not about to say that the way I live my life is the way everyone else ought to live theirs. Having said that, I think you can look more deeply at your question and ask what's motivating the person who is seeking to be active in BDSM. Do you think someone who identifies as a Mistress/Master, slave/sub, or whatever, is in any way different from someone who says they're vanilla? If they're not different, why bother with a site like CollarMe? Why do we even have terms like D/s or BDSM or SSC or RACK in our vocabulary? Is it possible that people who are drawn to BDSM are motivated by things *other than* sexual gratification? I've said it before, and I still believe this is true: I think a closeted kinkster who is trying to figure out how BDSM relates to his (or her) core identity while trapped in a vanilla marriage is fighting a different set of psychological pressures than someone who is tempted by the hottie next door in a short skirt. And, acknowledging that the basic issues affecting vanillas vs. BDSMers are different is not the same as rationalizing infidelity. I don't see any conflict at all between saying Yes, for some people, BDSM is a need, and No, it is not ok to cheat.
|