Focus50 -> RE: Well trained sub/slave... (6/9/2010 4:36:20 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sir1969 Just curious about something. Wife and I have been searching for our sub for 2+ years now, no luck. Mostly run into fakes or when we do communicate for a while, they'll just up and vanish. Maybe just our bad luck as some people on here are actually finding what they seek - at least that is what I wish to believe . My question though is more about what some subs/slaves put in their profiles. Often, many will claim they are well trained by such and such a dom/domme, etc. As if that is a strong selling point. But I'm wondering if that is actually a good thing. Just because they are "trained" doesn't mean they would be a good sub/slave for me - I have very particular tastes and rules, etc. It almost seems it would be better to find someone with little or no training. Maybe just enough experience to know they want more. Thoughts? I think subs saying they're "trained" is just a way of saying they're not naive or novices etc. Personally, I'd much prefer novice to experienced (not that I'd exclude the latter) because I don't regard "untrained" as being a burden or drawback, as many a sub seems to.... And frankly, there's something beguiling in training a hesitant newbie sub terrified of disappointing, even if she doesn't know that's practically impossible to do. But I'm not gonna tell her that; least, not at the time.... You're right; a sub with 20yrs of training still isn't gonna know what *I* desire or expect of her. Yep, that previous experience means she'll learn and adapt faster - it's just that I'm not in any hurry for her to know it all; that "training" is at least as enjoyable (to me) as trained. If I've gotta be somewhere a hundred miles or more away, I'm still gonna enjoy the view getting there.... Focus.
|
|
|
|