RE: Submissive's profile picture (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


juliahdonna -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (6/30/2010 4:46:38 AM)

everyone's already seen a penis before




pyroaquatic -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (6/30/2010 5:17:29 AM)

Alright... Pants I can do but can I at least have no shirt?

Of course I was artfully naked and soft at one time. Where did that picture go? The pic was not a cock shot. More like a near-miss cockshot. COCKSHOT.

SHOOT A COCK.




sirsholly -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (6/30/2010 5:19:31 AM)

quote:

Do you want to see a picture of his body or just his face? Since you can have multiple pictures, what do you want to see in them?
A cock is the last thing i want to see. Show me the eyes and the smile.




OttersSwim -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (6/30/2010 7:43:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

Do you want to see a picture of his body or just his face? Since you can have multiple pictures, what do you want to see in them?
A cock is the last thing i want to see. Show me the eyes and the smile.


Right, like this...


[image]local://upfiles/667175/95158C02DD6D45E9A6F7FE9C806155A1.jpg[/image]




blackwingedangel -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/1/2010 8:10:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

JUST SAY NO TO COCK SHOTS!!!!
Oops, that might have been a little loud.
[>:]



I second that emotion!

I like to see fully clothed. I understand if they cant post their face for the world to see, but the rest of them, please be clothed.

Though I also agree that the cock shots help weed people out faster




trueshadow -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/1/2010 8:40:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

I, for one, would love to see more of you, Peon ;)



And this is from a married woman.

Men have always known that women are interested in appearance, but not to the extent as it is today.  In the 'Mad Men' era (50s early 60s), women had fewer economic opportunities, so they valued earning potential highly.  The ordinary guy had a great chance to find an attractive woman who would keep house and bear children.  They grew old together, and stayed married.  How rare that is now!

As they have taken over much of the workplace, they have far fewer money woes, so they can afford to be much more picky. 

Men who have striven for success believing it would enhance their marketability have found that that is no longer very important.  Most women are going for younger men, for their looks.  They are willing to support the 'underemployed' (or unemployed or even lazy) men.  Then they complain that their men don't have a job.

This leads to fewer marriages, fewer children, and less stability in society. 

Men now have to spend much more time in grooming.  They must have full heads of hair, clean-shaven, no body hair.  Otherwise, they are relegated to the dust bin of life-long bachelorhood.

And if they are 'lucky' enough to get married, their wives will cheat on them.  Two of my three wives have done that; they just wanted 'variety'. 

This is improvement?  Not for men.  But, of course, that doesn't count for much these days. 




trueshadow -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/1/2010 8:51:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

I absolutely LOVE various naked, objectified, sexually crude photos of men.
Akasha



My point exactly. 

Years ago, I was knew a woman who was infatuated with a male model type with the six-pack, tall, great-looking.  Dumb as a post and never could hold down a job.  He leached on my friend for several years, yet all she saw was how good-looking he was.  I lost contact with her but the last I heard she was still trying to nail this guy down.  He'd get 'serious' and tell her he loved her, then run off with another woman, then get drunk and profess undying love, etc.  She never got married, just chasing the male beauty. 

But, whatever.




trueshadow -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/1/2010 9:02:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gedienstig

Evolutionary speaking, "good looks" are concidered good genes, especially since the current theory is that looks are inheritable, intelligence is not. Intelligence is mostly good because it equals good resources now. I think you basically want someone with the same level of intelligence as you, do you really think a dumber woman would be happy with an extremely intelligent man?


What theory?  Intelligence is largely inherited.  Not completely, but you don't have a Rhodes scholar come from a family of inbred cretins. 

My first wife was bright.  She left me for a co-worker who cheated on her constantly, until she divorced him (serves her right.)  My second wife was a jewel, not that bright but sweet beyond belief.  She left me because I worked too hard.  My third wife cheated before we got married and after we were married.  Morals of an alley cat.  Didn't bother her at all.  I couldn't cheat on any of them because I felt so guilty.




zenny -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/1/2010 9:13:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut

LA - Actually Keli isn't showing tits she is showing cleavage BIG differnce.



I see areola and large portions of her breasts (much more than just cleavage - the whole tops and some of the other side). Yes, she is showing her 'tits'.




blueeyedbbwsub -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/1/2010 9:33:26 PM)

I'm going to give the standard answer I used to give in chat rooms when guys sent you cam invites and you got that o so loverly cock shot. If you think I want to see your damn cock when I can't touch it, feel it, hold it, then why the hell would I want to see you wankin off? Sorry, I have better things to do with me time than view some guys wrinkled thingie, all hairy, all tallywakker looking. And it that's all you have to offer? Well, I'm going to move on and damn quick.

I've been going thru profiles for the last week or so just for something to do, I've seen more cock shots and ass shots than I could possibly have actually screwed during my slutty years. And those with ass shots showing these huge metal hooks or with butt plugs? Just EEEEWWWW. Put on some clothes for cripes sake. Don't think you're thrilling most women with what you consider your "best" asset. Cuz on cam, most of the time, it sure doesn't look it.




MistressTorture -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/2/2010 10:19:10 PM)

Please NO cock pics.




SirsJewel -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/2/2010 10:46:27 PM)

Personally, i love a pic of a guy caught off candedly,just a nice guy here with desires like everyone else has, But i agree having to show off your assests or hoist em up for that matter(sorry couldn't help it lol) just shows what you want people to take you for,and that's a bit shallow in the long run. Have fun and enjoy the site,it's a good question and shows you are pleasing in nature. Do a bit on your positives in your profile too,it truly helps i think,good luck ~ jewels




lally2 -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/3/2010 12:31:49 AM)

oh god you guys have to actually change the male psyche right around in a way dont you - [:D]

i mean a male Dom salivates over nude pics and wants to see a fem subs 'junk' almost as a passport to meeting up.  not always i know, but the contrast is striking.

it makes you realise in a way that quite a few men really havent got a clue how different we are about this stuff.  maybe male subs should spend a bit of time trying to understand those differences first.




SnowRanger -> RE: Submissive's profile picture (7/4/2010 12:27:31 PM)

Again with photos of roosters! Some of us guys never learn!




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875