BofA wants judge to allow Utah foreclosure sales

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

BofA wants judge to allow Utah foreclosure sales

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> BofA wants judge to allow Utah foreclosure sales

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

BofA wants judge to allow Utah foreclosure sales - 6/14/2010 10:19:19 PM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

BofA wants judge to allow Utah foreclosure sales

In court » Ruling expected today; hundreds of trustee sales halted.

The power of a top U.S. bank to sell foreclosed homes in Utah hung in the balance Thursday. A federal judge heard legal arguments on an order that has temporarily halted hundreds of trustee sales by lending behemoth Bank of America and its foreclosure arm ReconTrust. His ruling is expected today. Bank attorneys attacked a preliminary injunction that was issued May 22 on behalf of St. George homeowner Peni Cox. Her lawyer contends that Bank of America and its affiliates lacked legal standing to conduct those sales in Utah because ReconTrust isn't registered as a business entity with the Utah Department of Commerce.

``If it wants the power of foreclosure, it must comply with state law,'' attorney Christian Barlow of St. George told U.S. District Court Judge Clark Waddoups. ``If a bank is foreclosing in the state of Utah, it should have offices in Utah and allow people to negotiate with it face to face.'' But bank attorney Roy Arnold argued that 5th District Court Judge James L. Shumate in St. George had run afoul of proper legal procedure, saying he issued the injunction without a hearing or adequate notice to bank officials. Homeowner Cox also had not posted a security bond as required by law, Arnold said. Bank lawyers attacked the legal basis for the injunction as well, arguing that state laws requiring companies to register when transacting business in Utah do not apply to national financial institutions. Their contention: those banks are instead covered by federal laws and regulations under the National Bank Act.

The preliminary injunction is too broad and has caused BofA ``significant harm'' by impeding to its ability to foreclose on all delinquent Utah owners, of both commercial and residential properties across Utah, Arnold said. In pointed questioning, Judge Waddoups challenged Barlow as to why Cox's individual case had halted all BofA foreclosure sales. ``I don't think she has standing,'' the judge said. ``It's not a class action.'' Barlow, who said Cox has been out of her home for months, responded that Judge Shumate had been bound by state law to stop all the sales when BofA's legal basis for conducting them came into question. ReconTrust has about 970 trustee sales now pending in the state, according to its website.

Coming amid a surge of foreclosures across Utah, the case highlights frustration felt by thousands of delinquent Utah homeowners who have tried in vain to contact and negotiate with the true owner of their loans. Cox said in an interview that she filed her lawsuit after months of frustrated attempts to negotiate a short sale of the property with Bank of America's loan servicing company, BAC Home Loan Services. ``Peni is not asking for a free house,'' her attorney said. ``We just don't know who holds the note, and Bank of America cannot prove they own Peni's loan.'' Most mortgages are sold shortly after they are signed and subsequently bundled into investment securities, commonly making direct talks between the loan holder and the distressed homeowner all but impossible. Arnold, the BofA lawyer, told Waddoups that Salt Lake company New Line Mortgage had originally written Cox's mortgage; BAC Home Loan Services was servicing the loan; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, or MERS, a Virginia-based mortgage data registry was ``the beneficiary acting on behalf of the note holder;'' and that he believed the note itself was held by government-backed lender Fannie Mae. He said at one point it was unclear why Bank of America had even been drawn into the case. Attorney Craig Smay of Salt Lake City, who also argued on Cox's behalf, said after the hearing that Cox's case was typical of the convoluted trail most owners in foreclosure face in tracing the ownership their mortgage.

Smay's firm is pursuing at least 30 similar cases in federal court, challenging the legal status of various parties filing foreclosures. The case has sent ripples through the wide community of homeowners, real-estate officials, trustees, lenders and attorneys involved in foreclosures in Utah. Benches in the courtroom were packed Thursday. Andrea Dailey of South Jordan watched Thursday's proceedings closely. She said later she had lost her home to foreclosure following the death last year of her husband Tim. After failed attempts to negotiate with Bank of America, she said she opted instead to try to buy back the property in the Daybreak subdivision when it came up for at foreclosure auction. The latest auction date, scheduled for Thursday, had to be canceled pending the outcome in Cox's case, the sixth such postponement. ``I just want my home back,'' Dailey said.

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_15269949?source=most_viewed

< Message edited by pahunkboy -- 6/14/2010 10:22:16 PM >

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: BofA wants judge to allow Utah foreclosure sales - 6/14/2010 10:24:45 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

The Judge disolved the order, pa. BoA is once again in business in Utah.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: BofA wants judge to allow Utah foreclosure sales - 6/14/2010 11:08:03 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

A bit unsuspected in a state where a Woman lost her house over a $43 dentist bill. In a country where bankers are lobbying to get quick foreclosures without a court proceeding at all to sell people's houses out from under them. Who is going to call the sherrif to put you out ? Is the bank going to just call the sherriff's office directly and say "We just writ up the papers, go there and kick them out tonight" ? Is that where we are headed ?

Now the sad part. Assholes used to say love it or leave it. Maybe I sould have left it. Go to Canada or whatever. I think how things would be so different sometimes. We are going down the tubes. I will stick around because I do have some sense of loyalty, but it is fading fast. Also, it would be hard to make such a change at this stage in my life. I am about to stick it up the bank's ass this year. Maybe thirty or forty grand, I lost count. But I no compunctions about that after what they did to my country. Wish me luck. The laws have already changed enough that I have had to dance a bit. But I do have probably one of the best lawyers in the state for this. What I'm fighting right now, I consider myself lucky to only need two of them on retainer. But sometimes you just have to put your money where your mouth is to get things done and done right.

It's a game. That's the way they think of it so therefore so do I. I won about thirty grand. They paid off my sinister's new car. They suppied the materials for countless parties and several construction jobs. I have nothing to whine about and if you want to say that I am part of the problem I can accept that. I don't like doing business this way, but circumstances being how they are, well, I must analyse and adapt. Well I adapted.

While I don't like this overall, I have no remorse. Bankers ruined this fucking country for their own personal gain. I just wish I could do more in return, but as expected they responded to my actions and right now, I got what I got and there is no more coming. Cool. I was born with nothing and that's exactly what the world owes me - nothing.

But I thought some of you might enjoy knowing that I stuck it up their ass. Yes it was a plan. It was a conspircy I tell you, but mainly only one preson was involved, but I did have a partner who lended his figure to the "total income" which allowed me to hit them harder.

For all you bank and government haters out there, here is the best possible outcome. At fifty or fifty one I will have a check coming in, free medical care and still some remnant of a job where I might not make all the much but I make it fast. Paid off cars and houses. Nothing but utilities to pay and food stamps, now known as the grub stub. Perfect retirement for me, and before fifty three. (plus I'm quite the poet at times)

If it all works out I might just stay in the US forever.

T

< Message edited by Termyn8or -- 6/14/2010 11:11:50 PM >

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 3