RE: D/s & M/s relationships (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


leadership527 -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/17/2010 12:00:59 PM)

Relationships fail because they fail. It has nothing to do with intensity. It has to do with crappy relationship skills.

Edited to add
And I have to agree with porcelaine also. A focus on roles rather than individuals is not going to be conducive to long-term happiness




LadyPact -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/17/2010 2:56:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael
Here is what you are missing, many of us have extensive real world bdsm experience in large and diverse bdsm communities and quite a few of us know each other in real life.  You aren't talking to some chatroom full of wankers who are easily impressed.


While I might have worded this a bit differently, I am in agreement with it.  I just came back from a great trip where I was very happy to have the chance to see many M/s couples that I've known for years, still together.  I'm very much looking forward to a gathering of folks where I get to see some pairings that I really think they have it going on.  If I rattled off the number of years that all of these various folks have been together, it would range from seven years that they found each other up to thirty-three.  All of them are pretty awesome, if you ask Me.




IronBear -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/17/2010 4:07:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

Relationships fail because they fail. It has nothing to do with intensity. It has to do with crappy relationship skills.

Edited to add
And I have to agree with porcelaine also. A focus on roles rather than individuals is not going to be conducive to long-term happiness


Just not sure what is meant by "ROLES". In lifestyle M/s relationships and especially 24/7, both Master/Mistress and slave/servant are not roles but a definition of each party within the relationship and nothing more.




leadership527 -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/17/2010 4:32:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear
Just not sure what is meant by "ROLES". In lifestyle M/s relationships and especially 24/7, both Master/Mistress and slave/servant are not roles but a definition of each party within the relationship and nothing more.
Well, i don't quite get so heeby-jeeby about the word "role". I'm pretty ok with using the word "role" in the same way a behavioral psychologist might use it. In this context, I have a role in my life as a "manager", a "husband", and about a zillion other things.

What I meant though specifically by this post is that I oft-times get the feel that people are more focused on finding "A MASTER" or "A SLAVE" than they are "a partner who makes me happy". I think there's a lot of effort to conform to role definitions that, near as I can tell, seem to have spawned out of the quantum internet soup. So some "slave" gets an image of what a "master" is from god knows where... partly reading... partly his/her own imagination... partly god knows where else... then goes out looking for someone to fulfill that niche. Fundamentally, I don't believe that asking another human to fulfill my preconceived notions is a particularly effective way to find or maintain a relationship. When I see some slave looking at me and seeing "a master" not "me", it really annoys me.




IronBear -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/17/2010 10:14:12 PM)

Fair enough mate I do agree with this... I also see all of life is a series of roles from home to work to play we are oft different things to different people like it or not and realizing it or not. 




SirNomdeplume -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/18/2010 7:59:57 AM)

Yes I think I agree it does grow old. Master slave dominate submissive are all titles or lables worn by the man or womam as they choose. Finding the person who has defined their lable as you want the lable to be defiined is very difficult. We are given some basic definations form the BDSM lifestyle group and even Webster, however it is our own special take on those definations that defines our partner or partners.




cassandria -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/18/2010 9:18:55 AM)

I think I'll go with what porcelaine spoke about in terms of many people searching for someone who seems to embody those immediate traits that they feel make up a submissive/slave or Dominant, rather than what kind of person is truly a good compliment to themselves.

I would like to add something..

Expecting that one individual will consistently make you "happy" within any relationship, to me, is unrealistic. The point is to share life together, with whatever it brings - good and bad. Giving of yourself, not just taking.

Honouring a commitment that you make to that person, deciding to love them, care for them, to build a life together based on respect, hard work, shared memories and history together is known to keep bonds strong and relationships lasting (at least, with what I know.)

That takes maturity.




MasterGreg43 -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/19/2010 3:58:40 AM)

well in a since u are correct most of the relationships are short term, with thoughts of long term, but usually someone dont have the same commintment to the relationship or the position that is self choice to do, and then again many other things take place that cause many changes in lifestyle not so much a burnout, u could never not have something to learn in this lifestyle, I am always looking to learn more about things of this lifestyle which I may or maynot have done before, over 15yrs and still feel many things I like hands on learn from a respective Top before I experience on property that belong to Me, not only we have to take our slaves to new level, we as tops need to reach for new levels as well, it not easy to adjust to every kind of slave or sub in our lifestyle, 5yrs ago I was blessed to have a pain slut to test some of My levels, until I found her limits but working up to such levels was indeed a sweet experience.




GregoryMK -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/20/2010 2:06:17 AM)

I don't really buy the "burn out" theory.

Yes you have relationships that "go vanilla" both form the dom and sub side, leaving the the person unhappy with the new dynamic, and that does lead to break ups. 

yes I think it is more complicated to find the right partner when you add the complexities of the BDSM kink to the relationship.

But I think one of the biggest drivers of the perception that BDSM relationships are short lived is that many stable couples just opt out of the public scene to a large degree.  You bump into them on occasion ask how it's going and find out that yeah they are still M/s, still kinky, and got a St. Andrews in the garage and hide the spanking bench as a comforter stand when the in-laws visit...

G.




erebus -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/26/2010 8:38:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marie2

I think sometimes people set themselves up for unrealistic expectations with regards to the ds aspects of the relationship, therefore they end up getting disappointed.

Another problem with the dominance or submission waning and ultimately causing the demise of the relationship, is that too many people hit it off on that level and expect to found an entire relationship on the ds charge and excitement. If that's the only basis, then I don't think there's a good chance of longterm, because when the ds gets shelved suddenly they have nothing in common.


What she said.  Took the words right out of my mouth (I think she grabbed a tonsil as well...Ouch!)




Jeffff -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/26/2010 8:40:09 PM)

For a roller dog eating bitch..... she makes alot of sense.




Zevar -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/26/2010 9:12:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warlock1935

My question is why do D/s & M/s relationships seem to last such a short time? I notice that most don't last more than three to five years.
I had the thought that because these types of relationships are so much more intense, that it's like living a week every day; so three years in a 24/7 D/s relationship is like 21 years in a Vanilla relationship. Or sort of like the fire that burns the hottest burns out more quickly, if that makes sense.
The other idea I had was that since Scene relationships have to be compatible on both the Vanilla level and on the Scene level as well, it's harder to get a good match than it is on the Vanilla level alone?
In BDSM relationships, the problem I see most often seems to be that the Dom goes through all his ideas in a year or two, and sort of "goes Vanilla". That is, he comes home tired one day and just wants to grab a beer and watch TV, not play. I don't seem to see the same syndrome in submissives; and I don't seem to hear about that happening much in D/s relationships.
Anybody know the answer to this?
~~Warlock


Empirically speaking I disagree with your averages that you claim of 3 to 5 years for the sustainability of D/s & M/s relationships. The presented theory of yours is more like a generalization of the longevity of relationships that are formed between those who identify with D/s & M/s.

Overall relationships regardless of their nature are based on trust. Without the element of mutual trust there is no foundation to build upon. I do not know how you arrived at your summation of your averages and timelines. I will say that many people that I am personally aware of who have formed D/s & M/s relationship bonds one to another could clearly dispute your suppositional standpoint.

Relationships require trust and maturity at the helm while realism balances the realm of erotic fantasy in order to convert the mutually consensual sexual exchange that is reflective of a shared bond of trust. That I might add is indicative of a bond of trust that is as strong as steel yet tender as the petals of a flower when required. Else YES any relationship is doomed for destructions’ doorway. Adulthood 101 teaches us so, IMO.




LafayetteLady -> RE: D/s & M/s relationships (6/26/2010 11:24:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warlock1935

Ummm - Well, I'm happy for you that your relationship has lasted eight years, and that you and your partner love and respect each other. I assume from what you say that you have a BDSM relationship. It's been a few years since I've been in what I'd consider a BDSM relationship, DesFIP, but I remember that mine, and those of all my friends who were in them, were loving and respectful.

Now, I don't consider myself an expert on relationships, but I've been around the Scene awhile. I collared my first submissive nearly thirty years ago; these days I'm D/s, High Protocol, and Ritualistic. My longest relationship was what, personally, I'd consider a BDSM 24/7 relationship, and it lasted just under twenty years.

Again, unless the definitions have changed, both BDSM and D/s relationships are by definition loving and respectful. Personally, I see the difference as simply that in a D/s relationship, the focus is less on the Play aspect and more on the spiritual bonding and on the Dominance/submission mental interaction. If you'll reread my post, you'll find that I didn't say that BDSM relationships are just kinky sex - you did. Personally, I see the two types as equally valid, they simply appeal to different tastes. I also, by the way, see "occasional kinky sex in the bedroom" type relationships as also equally valid.



Now by those definitions, a BDSM relationship should last longer, not shorter. The better two people know each other, the deeper the connection (kinky of not), solidifies a relationship, it doesn't destroy it.

I think what happens in both BDSM relationships and vanilla ones nowadays is that there are a lot of unrealistic expectations. We live in an "instant gratification" type of society. Many people these days aren't willing to work on a problem and find a solution to continue the relationship. It's much easier to turn tail and run than put forth the work.

Now of course, we see here all the time on the boards how often a "D-type" doesn't feel he needs to work on anything, it's his way or no way. Certainly that can be true on some things, but in the long term, when there is a problem it needs to be worked out as a couple with both people contributing to the solution (or everyone in the case of a poly family).

I would be very surprised if the people here who are in long term, happy BDSM relationships said that when some kind of problem or "rough patch" hits, that the d-type says this is how it is going to be from now on without the two of them having a discussion about all sides of the issue. Successful relationships don't work that way, one main reason because no smart s-type is going to live a life feeling like their thoughts, feelings, problems and issues are irrelevant and ignored all the time.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875