FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Now. There. I got all hardcore on your ass.
Feel justified?
You asked for a discussion, and I responded with facts and calmness.
You come back with the old "liar" trick, proving that you can't discuss anything calmly, nor do you have any interest in doing so.
Firm
No. you lying fool. I gave you a chance to retract your lies (2 opportunities as a matter of fact). You failed to do the honorable thing so I called you on it.
You've now called me a racist twice. You have zero evidence for that claim and know it. You can't discuss anything without engaging in ad hominen or semantics which is frankly pathetic.
Strangely for someone so eager to toss around claims of bigotry you have made two very bigoted statements in this thread. That marks you the hypocritical bigot not I.
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Your assumption is that he couldn't come up with the money himself.
Your "wink, wink, nod, nod" assumption is that he is a poor, dumb, black guy, and therefore couldn't have decided to do something like this himself. He must be someone's puppet.
Typical liberal condescension to our African American citizens.
So, DK, where is "the lie" in the above three paragraphs where you claim "I lie"?
Aren't you assuming he didn't come up with the money himself? Yep. No lie there.
Is Greene 1) poor, 2) dumb, 3) black? Yep, seems to be all three. No lie there. Or at least you aren't arguing against any of the three points (I'm not so sure he is as quite as dumb as many think he is, though).
Are you assuming he is someone's puppet? Yep. No lie there.
Are you a liberal? Yep, no argument there, I don't think, is there?
So where is the lie, exactly, my friend? It must be in this sentence:
Typical liberal condescension to our African American citizens.
Based on the evidence I gave i.e. 1) race has been mentioned in every single serious article about how he might have gotten the votes for the nomination, and 2) you have studiously and overtly ignored the race issue, I can only come to the conclusion that you are well aware of it, but choose not to mention it.
As I said, the question that comes to mind is why you choose to ignore it?
My conclusion and opinion is that you were either awaiting someone else to bring up the issue so that you can race-bait (which you immediately did), and that your typical liberal condescension towards black Americans ("oh, they are so incapable of helping themselves, and so easily misguided and not smart enough to make their own decisions ... those evil Repuglicans have mislead him!") leads you to easily believe that he is a puppet.
Never occur to you that he was feed up with the establishment political players in SC, and that the black Democratic voters were as well?
Didn't think so. I think it's a possibility.
You don't think it a possibility because of your inherent liberal blindness to the full humanity of black Americans.
That makes you a bigot in my book. And I called you on it. And you have no defense other than throwing the "liar! liar! pants on fire!" bullshit out there.
Tell me, where was the lie? You might disagree with my opinion. You can even state that. I have no problems with you doing that.
But a "lie" is a false statement of fact, that one knows to be untrue, not a disagreement on opinion.
Anything unclear to you now?
Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|
RE: A positive note about Alvin Green! - 
Profile
RE: A positive note about Alvin Green! - 
heee! 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread