RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 12:39:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

His ratings would skyrocet?


That's French, isn't it? Sounds French to me! What's your problem with America, buddy?




Shitty fries!

And Californian wine. Don't forget that muck.




KenDckey -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 12:57:01 PM)

Treason no    Everyone is entitled to an opinion

being fired like he was was a good thing because officers are forbidden to express their opinion




juliaoceania -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 3:59:47 PM)

This is a link to colbert's take on McChrystal...

He has it just right

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/23/colbert-mcchrystal-had-to_n_622364.html




Elisabella -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 4:31:56 PM)

Hehehehee McChrystal methods. That was clever as.




juliaoceania -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 4:39:28 PM)

I think it would be considered McChrystal-Meth-Head....lol




Elisabella -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 4:41:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I think it would be considered McChrystal-Meth-Head....lol


LOL yeah I was going to write it that way. But <3 Colbert for that. For everything, really. Clever and attractive, I likey :D




domiguy -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 4:44:23 PM)

Having a lovely glass of sky rocet with my foie gras.




pahunkboy -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 5:55:28 PM)

and the French did it!


STOMP




juliaoceania -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/23/2010 8:59:40 PM)

fast reply


I support this decision.....


He shamed his position.... and I am glad he is gone....




Jeffff -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/24/2010 5:57:03 AM)

I want to go on recored saying.


Nice Tits!




pahunkboy -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/24/2010 6:12:51 AM)

I like the pic of the sunset.   




FirmhandKY -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/24/2010 6:19:07 AM)

FR:

I think McChrystal deserved to be canned.

He was stupid (or uncaring) to let a Rolling Stones reporter into his inner circle, and deserves to be canned, or he intentionally set things up this way because he wanted to be canned.

Either way, Obama had to get rid of him.

Firm




DarkSteven -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/24/2010 6:32:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

FR:

I think McChrystal deserved to be canned.

He was stupid (or uncaring) to let a Rolling Stones reporter into his inner circle, and deserves to be canned, or he intentionally set things up this way because he wanted to be canned.

Either way, Obama had to get rid of him.

Firm


I agree.  It's likely the last thing Obama wanted to do, fire someone he had just appointed a year ago, and stretch Petraeus out as well, but any alternative would have killed morale as well as made Obama appear weak.

Obama handled it just right.  No immediate action, called him back to Washington, and after the talk let him go.

I just hope that he gets a replacement pronto before Petraeus burns out.




thompsonx -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/25/2010 1:03:33 AM)

FR:
How bout we get the fuck out of there and let union oil fight it's own battles.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Should McChrystal be fired for the Rolling Stone interview? (6/26/2010 7:28:49 AM)

FR:

Back on-topic.

The reporters take:

Writer defends role in demise of Stanley McChrystal
June 26, 2010 12:00AM

THE man who, in effect, ended General Stanley McChrystal's glittering military career says he thought he was "unfireable".

In a candid interview yesterday, journalist Michael Hastings said he never imagined he would get so much access to the general and his inner circle. He insisted he was simply doing his job as a reporter and denied that his methods were underhand.

Hastings's devastating expose of General McChrystal and his aides led US President Barack Obama to dismiss the man credited widely as the mastermind of the US strategy in Afghanistan.

"I realised that it was very strong material for a profile," Hastings, 30, said. "But I thought McChrystal was unfireable. I thought his position was very well protected."

...

"They are fun guys to hang out with," Hastings told The Times. "They are impressive people. I just don't know if their solution for Afghanistan is appropriate."

The freelance reporter, who grew up in Vermont and upstate New York, denied he set out to have General McChrystal fired. "It was to get people to say, 'Hey, what's going on in Afghanistan?'. It's often as if America doesn't even realise it's fighting two wars."

...

"War is not something abstract to me," he said. "Many of my friends have suffered immensely. I just want to make sure that the sacrifices are worth it."... From 2005 to 2007, he was the magazine's correspondent in Baghdad, until his girlfriend was killed in an ambush. Soon afterwards, he wrote a memoir, How I Lost My Love In Baghdad. It received mixed reviews, with The New York Times pointing to a "whiff of exploitation".

...


In an article for GQ about campaign journalism, Hastings wrote: "You pretend to be friendly and non-threatening, and over time you 'build trust', which everybody involved knows is an illusion. If the time comes, if your editor calls for it, you're supposed to f . . k them over." That, and the extraordinary level of access that Hastings enjoyed with General McChrystal, prompted a Fox News commentator to describe him as a "rat in an eagle's nest". One rival reporter in Kabul dismissed his McChrystal profile as "people bitching about Washington. What's new?"

Firm




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.515625E-02