Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Subs as sexists?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Subs as sexists? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/14/2006 1:17:56 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
FEMDOMs can have issues with Male Doms as well.

Generally, it just seems wrong for a man to beat up on a woman although this is not exactly what happens in BDSM. Also, men have enough advantages already, so giving them even more power and authority over women seems like the wrong way to go. Lastly, I'm sure people cannot help but think of the violence men inflict on women (rapes, batteries, and assaults) when thinking about BDSM.

Blue Velvet explored this netherworld. When Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper) strikes Dorothy Vallens (Isabella Rossellini) and she likes it, responds to it --- one is SHOCKED. It seems twisted. Next when Dorothy Vallens asks the innocent, caring Jeffrey Beaumont (Kyle MacLachlan) to hit her, not only is it hard for him to do, but it hurts him more than it does her (she likes it.) The Frank Booth scenes were particularly violent and scary, and one doesn't get the feeling its exactly consensual --- but Dorothy gets a kind of twisted pleasure out of Frank and somehow relishes her trapped, slavish status.

Its interesting, too, how in The Secretary James Spader's character, although imbued with the power to dispense sadistic corrections of Maggie Gyllenhaal, had qualms of conscience about it and himself --- and like Kyle MacLachlan, its as if he suffered more than his submissive counterpart. His sub actually has to talk him back into role and action.

From a BDSM perspective, Blue Velvet probably drew up the architypal male DOM as a cross between the two male heroes, Frank Booth and Jeffrey Beaumont. Such a man would rest between a suburban, safe man and an antisocial, sociopathic, criminal one --- fusing danger and safety into one being.


< Message edited by cloudboy -- 4/14/2006 1:48:27 PM >

(in reply to Aimtoplease101)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/14/2006 3:49:37 PM   
foxnotinsox


Posts: 84
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: eastern Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

The submissive men (mostly straight, from what I could gather) generally applauded and supported female dominance, including physical discipline of male submissives.  On the other hand, they had a dim view of males dominating, and especially disciplining, female subs.  They found something offensive, or churlish, about that dynamic.
<snip>
My own view was that the male subs simply wanted to view the world in a way that most supported their own interest-- i.e., approval of dominant women.  I didn't consider that to be necessarily sexist.  In fact, I thought it was rather curious that a group of men who were voicing belief in female dominance to be called "sexist" in a way that implied that they somehow thought less of women.


No not sexist .. yet perhaps selfish.
For every woman who chooses to submit, means one less available to have available to dominate them. Because even though they applauded one group of women, to look down with distain at another ... well, sorry but for me that cancels the first one out.


_____________________________

oxox,foX
Veni vidi veni

(in reply to Aimtoplease101)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/14/2006 4:45:26 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
Ms. TammyJo,

Thank you for that response. The whole situation is really intriguing. That's a good point you make about these classes being made up of particular students in some ways, and I assume they're more open to different sexual lifestyles.

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/14/2006 5:36:46 PM   
Cloudz


Posts: 836
Joined: 9/13/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vancouver_cinful

I just have trouble wrapping my mind around how some people can be open-minded but restict that openmindedness to small corners of the world they deem "ok".

This is the type of thinking you see with homophobic males who think gay males should burn in hell for their "sin" but girl-on-girl action is "cool". Ugghhh, I just have to walk away from people like this or my brain hits critical mass!

Cin


Cin darling,

The people you mention are not familar with the definition of openmindedness...do not bother trying to "wrap your mind" around the ignorant..there are too many of them... we are outnumbered <grin>

_____________________________

Enjoy the Journey,
~Cloudz

"Life isn't about how to survive the storm, but how to dance in the rain."


(in reply to Vancouver_cinful)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/14/2006 9:01:01 PM   
Vancouver_cinful


Posts: 1911
Joined: 2/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cloudz
Cin darling,

The people you mention are not familar with the definition of openmindedness...do not bother trying to "wrap your mind" around the ignorant..there are too many of them... we are outnumbered <grin>


Sadly, I think you're right on this. I don't suppose I'll ever be able to guite understand their logic.

Cin

_____________________________

Cin

quote:


My Karma Account is huge, but I just can't seem to make a withdrawal!!

http://cinful.wordpress.com

(in reply to Cloudz)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/14/2006 11:24:23 PM   
akisha


Posts: 2071
Joined: 6/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

Since slaves are sexy, I guess it could be argued that subs may be sexist.....




ohhh so does that mean a sub with some slave tendancies/desires would be the sexiest? *giggles*

byt IB i love reading you're posts, they very interesting *grins*

_____________________________

I'm confused.... No wait!!! Maybe I'm not

It's not a blonde moment! It's momentary peroxide posioning. ;)

Your pain makes me smile ~ Happy Bunny

532-095-649

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/15/2006 12:08:34 AM   
ServiceNTucson


Posts: 127
Joined: 4/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aimtoplease101

My own view was that the male subs simply wanted to view the world in a way that most supported their own interest-- i.e., approval of dominant women.

What do you think?
Regards,
ATP




I would agree with your statement above, but would add that this is true of the vast majority of all people, kinky, vanilla or what have you.

_____________________________

Harry

"I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book."

Groucho Marx


www.desertdominion.org

(in reply to Aimtoplease101)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/15/2006 12:26:53 AM   
TeeGO


Posts: 451
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Submotive
Personally, i have a difficult time wrapping my mind around the concept of a true male submissive - one that isn't a "do me sub" or one that doesn't have a lot of emotional issues.


Wow! As close minded as the OP's sub males were, this is right there with them. 

(in reply to Submotive)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/15/2006 9:19:59 AM   
texturedshroom


Posts: 27
Joined: 6/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Submotive
Personally, i have a difficult time wrapping my mind around the concept of a true male submissive - one that isn't a "do me sub" or one that doesn't have a lot of emotional issues.


Why do emotional issues preclude being a true male submissive?

(in reply to Submotive)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/15/2006 2:06:19 PM   
Aimtoplease101


Posts: 319
Joined: 2/8/2006
From: San Diego, California
Status: offline
Good observations cloudboy. Plus, I feel like I should get film criticism class credits!

Regards,
ATP

_____________________________

Pleasing you pleases me.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/15/2006 11:34:56 PM   
obis


Posts: 412
Joined: 9/9/2005
From: Austin, TX, USA
Status: offline
If anything, I'd describe it less as sexist than overly-PC. Even many male doms, as we see in the board and real life, when they first start out deal with a lot of the anxiety of feeling that we're going against gender equality. It can be unnerving to grow up being told about men and women being equal and then reach a point where you and a partner decide, in practice, to treat each other very unequally. Male submissives may be, essentially the opposite side of that anxiety, feeling even more condemning of male doms for the perceived abuse of societal male privilege.

Similar to why some feminists find female domination fine, but have serious trouble separating the idea of male domination from abuse.

(in reply to Submotive)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/16/2006 7:34:07 AM   
MsIncognito


Posts: 742
Joined: 5/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aimtoplease101

The submissive men (mostly straight, from what I could gather) generally applauded and supported female dominance, including physical discipline of male submissives.  On the other hand, they had a dim view of males dominating, and especially disciplining, female subs.  They found something offensive, or churlish, about that dynamic.

One submissive woman (who disagreed) raised an interesting issue.  She questioned whether submissive men who disdained male domination of women were really being sexist.  In other words, was it paternalistic, or condescending, to view it as acceptable for a dominant woman to dominate and punish a male sub, but to view it as "poor form" for a man to do the same to a woman?


I have noticed this exact same attitude in several male sub friends of mine. On of them even goes beyond disdain for male dominants to contempt, IMO. I think it comes from the fact that it pisses them off that there are women out there who aren't willing to dominate them (since so many of them have such a tough time finding a Mistress) so every woman who chooses submission is one less woman who will beat their ass. JMHO.

(in reply to Aimtoplease101)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Subs as sexists? - 4/16/2006 7:35:12 AM   
MsIncognito


Posts: 742
Joined: 5/24/2005
Status: offline
I have to ask: where do I get this? URL please?

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear




(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 33
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Subs as sexists? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156