Aneirin -> Afghanistan, job done ? (6/24/2010 6:29:25 AM)
|
With mounting casualties in the Afghanistan conflict and people on allied sides now really questioning this war, can the forces ever leave without the objective being completed ? First we were told it was about Al Quaeda, hunting the terrorists, then it was about the Taliban and freeing the people from their grasp and now, mentions of vast wealth in minerals that have obviously piqued the interest of western corporate powers, all that wealth to exploit, ( whether they already knew about it or not, it sounds very similar to the conflict to control oil as in Iraq and maybe Iran later on). But as the west takes stock of the casualties coming out of those lands and calling for an exit asap, can the allied forces actually leave, or have we created yet another no win situation ? Say for example the allied forces leave without removing the Taliban or even finding Osama, what will that mean, the Taliban threw out the Russians, one super power and now they have done the same to another super power, the Americans, it kind of makes a rag tag guerilla army superior to the world's superpowers. So during the war against the Ruskies there was US help via CIA, but who superior now is aiding the Taliban, or is it the west fell into the trap as they believed the Afghans were just underrated as a fighting force due to their lack of technical weaponry. If the allied forces pull out without the current objective completed, what will become of Afghanistan, for surely the Taliban will grow in numbers and strength as it will be seen as an Iconic country for all the west haters in the world, and there became a rallying point for those haters to train and operate from, if it wasn't before the war. Is Afghanistan yet another no win situation, is it going to be yet another country that has ejected superior forces and their spiral into oppression and despotic regime ? Is Afghanistan beginning to look like another past conflict and what should we learn from this ?
|
|
|
|