RE: Will the Queen be shot? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


JstAnotherSub -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:00:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

This just in, ol cabbage has just been shot, it was a mercury poisoned h1n1 syringe, launched from somewhere near the london tower....let's go to the scene, what can you tell us about the old bints condition, then,  Rodolfo?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caATBZEKL4c
Ha!  I find it disturbing, that as I read that, I heard Ray Stevens yellin out Dont look Ethyllllllllllllllll!




Syrox -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:02:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Actually jlf, he has already unmasked me as an agent of the NWO some time back, but even so I am getting paid quite a bit to monitor him here and give him every opportunity to recant before having him carted off. As you may have noted, my efforts to prevent such an unfortunate turn of events in certain other cases were unsuccessful.

E


So which are you... Hulk Hogan or Kevin Nash??




pahunkboy -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:07:15 PM)

How soon after her UN speech will there be peace?


In as much as the US and UK are involved.   10 years?




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:09:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Please stick to the topic on this thread.  



Which is what, exactly?




Syrox -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:09:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

How soon after her UN speech will there be peace?


In as much as the US and UK are involved.   10 years?



Depends on how long it takes you to hit the log out button and forget your password.




jlf1961 -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:39:13 PM)

I have been praying and asking all the saints to help hunky log out and forget where he put his computer




pahunkboy -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:44:31 PM)

It is this very attitude as to why we even HAVE war.

Which I have no kids- so what do I care.




jlf1961 -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:46:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Actually jlf, he has already unmasked me as an agent of the NWO some time back, but even so I am getting paid quite a bit to monitor him here and give him every opportunity to recant before having him carted off. As you may have noted, my efforts to prevent such an unfortunate turn of events in certain other cases were unsuccessful.

E


Okay, who did you get sent up?  Are you up on your quota, you know how the powers that be like good numbers of "conspiracy nuts" disappearing.[;)]




Syrox -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:46:32 PM)

no.. it's asshats like you who keep insisting on stirring the pot which is the reason why we have war.




pahunkboy -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:54:07 PM)

Happily I have no kids.

I am soon out of here.   So- the grip of the central bank can go hyper.      Not my problem.

War is peace.    




jlf1961 -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (6/29/2010 6:57:45 PM)

We have wars because humanity as a whole knows or has not learned another way to solve problems.

Since humans crawled down from trees we have fought wars, first with bare hands, then  Og figured out how to take a piece of tree branch and beat the shit out of some other poor cave man came the technology race.

You want peace, well keep praying for it.  Eventually humans may learn to solve problems in other ways, but I can tell you now, when humans leave this rock and travel among the stars, they will look at a space craft from another civilization and say, "It looks hostile, lets fuck with it."

Then the other race will blow this rock to atoms and God will say, "Glad I didnt put all my hopes on humans, they were a stupid bunch."




LanceHughes -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 11:12:27 AM)

PAHUNKBOY!  What ever happened to the Queen?  I didn't see any news on this.  Not even on an attempted assassination.  What's up with that?

You MUST answer for this thread......

Just one more example of your paranoia.  Get professional HELP as soon as possible.  And I mean it! 




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 11:18:55 AM)

She wears a bullet proof hat.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 11:20:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

She wears a bullet proof hat.


Made out of Hunk's leftover tinfoil




pahunkboy -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 11:35:10 AM)

So she wasnt shot.


I guess she was not. I still find her speech on peace to be odd.




Moonhead -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 11:44:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

So she wasnt shot.


I guess she was not. I still find her speech on peace to be odd.

I'm sure she'll be very upset to find that out.




LanceHughes -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 11:46:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
...and yet many prominent people are shot.  It was a shot that started WW1.   Consider too her speech for peace.

Do you see the set up?

At the time you wrote this, I did NOT see the set-up.

I still do not see the set-up or (in your view) what might remain of it.

Please show me the "set-up"

quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes
Just one more example of your paranoia.  Get professional HELP as soon as possible.  And I mean it!  




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 11:56:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
So she wasnt shot.
I guess she was not. I still find her speech on peace to be odd.

I'm sure she'll be very upset to find that out.

Even if she had been shot they would have just replaced her with one of those robotic doubles they have.




Moonhead -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 2:04:35 PM)

Robots? The illuminati has been growing clones in vats for fifty years, old boy! How did you think the mad old bat has lasted this long without a steady string of transplant organs? She's gone through more livers than George Best did...




LanceHughes -> RE: Will the Queen be shot? (7/10/2010 7:10:10 PM)

PaHunkBoy:  Here's the full text of the Queen's remarks.  Hardly a speech, but what strikes you as so odd?  Just trying to get to the meat of the matter from your POV.

[sarcasm = ON]

Oh, I get it !!! She then went to the Ground Zero site and laid a wreath.  Then off to a ceremonial ribbon cutting for the "British Gardens," a memorial to British citizens who were victims AND then, OMG!  a visit with the families of those victims.  Full story (heavily edited by the media, of course) is here:

[sarcasm = OFF]

http://dnainfo.com/20100706/manhattan/queen-elizabeth-addresses-un-before-ground-zero-visit

----------------------------
The following cut-n-paste can be found at:
http://www.examiner.com/x-52786-United-Nations-Examiner~y2010m7d7-Queen-Elizabeth-II-at-the-United-Nations--text-of-speech-videos but I brought it here so that you can quote this post and mark it up.  PLEASE do.  I'm still confused as to the "set-up."
----------------------------
Queen Elizabeth II spoke to the United Nations General Assembly on July 6, 2010. Following is the text of her remarks, as provided by The British Monarchy.

Mr President, Secretary-General, Members of the General Assembly,

I believe I was last here in 1957.

Since then, I have travelled widely and met many leaders, ambassadors and statesmen from around the world. I address you today as Queen of sixteen United Nations Member States and as Head of the Commonwealth of 54 countries.

I have also witnessed great change, much of it for the better, particularly in science and technology, and in social attitudes. Remarkably, many of these sweeping advances have come about not because of governments, committee resolutions, or central directives - although all these have played a part - but instead because millions of people around the world have wanted them.

For the United Nations, these subtle yet significant changes in people's approach to leadership and power might have foreshadowed failure and demise. Instead, the United Nations has grown and prospered by responding and adapting to these shifts.

But also, many important things have not changed. The aims and values which inspired the United Nations Charter endure: to promote international peace, security and justice; to relieve and remove the blight of hunger, poverty and disease; and to protect the rights and liberties of every citizen.

The achievements of the United Nations are remarkable. When I was first here, there were just three United Nations operations overseas. Now over 120,000 men and women are deployed in 26 missions across the world. You have helped to reduce conflict, you have offered humanitarian assistance to millions of people affected by natural disasters and other emergencies, and you have been deeply committed to tackling the effects of poverty in many parts of the world.

But so much remains to be done. Former Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold once said that ‘constant attention by a good nurse may be just as important as a major operation by a surgeon’. Good nurses get better with practice; sadly the supply of patients never ceases.

This September, leaders will meet to agree how to achieve the Millennium Development Goals when each nation will have its own distinctive contribution to make. New challenges have also emerged which have tested this organisation as much as its member states. One such is the struggle against terrorism. Another challenge is climate change, where careful account must be taken of the risks facing smaller, more vulnerable nations, many of them from the Commonwealth.

Mr. President,

I started by talking about leadership. I have much admiration for those who have the talent to lead, particularly in public service and in diplomatic life - and I congratulate you, your colleagues and your predecessors on your many achievements.

It has perhaps always been the case that the waging of peace is the hardest form of leadership of all. I know of no single formula for success, but over the years I have observed that some attributes of leadership are universal, and are often about finding ways of encouraging people to combine their efforts, their talents, their insights, their enthusiasm and their inspiration, to work together.

Since I addressed you last, the Commonwealth, too, has grown vigorously to become a group of nations representing nearly two billion people. It gives its whole-hearted support to the significant contributions to the peace and stability of the world made by the United Nations and its Agencies. Last November, when I opened the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Trinidad and Tobago, I told the delegates that the Commonwealth had the opportunity to lead. Today I offer you the same message.

For over six decades the United Nations has helped to shape the international response to global dangers. The challenge now is to continue to show this clear and convening leadership while not losing sight of your ongoing work to secure the security, prosperity and dignity of our fellow human beings.

When people in fifty-three years from now look back on us, they will doubtless view many of our practices as old-fashioned. But it is my hope that, when judged by future generations, our sincerity, our willingness to take a lead, and our determination to do the right thing, will stand the test of time.

In my lifetime, the United Nations has moved from being a high-minded aspiration to being a real force for common good. That of itself has been a signal achievement. But we are not gathered here to reminisce. In tomorrow’s world, we must all work together as hard as ever if we are truly to be United Nations.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875