Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael quote:
ORIGINAL: CompletelyHis How does having your Master play with you in public make you feel? Would you be upset if He never did? Uh, he is using you. With you in tow he can play "serious dom" and play with hotter women but who wouldn't fuck him and so he can take his moped home and fuck you in more ways than one. Harsh, ugly but true. Not because of WHAT he does but HOW he has let you feel about it. Michael - EXACTLY! Before reading your response I was going to answer with something similar. He is using her as his 'admission ticket'. Having been to one or two 'clubs over the years, I've seen it often at both S&M as well as 'Swingers', or Sex Clubs like Dante's, as they were called in the old days in NYC. Its most innocent usage is in paying the entry fee. One of the clubs we've been to in Vegas, The Green Door, charges a single male $225. for a 'weekly pass' or $110 for one night. The fee for a couple - $70 for the 'week', $60 for a Saturday. That cost is for the couple - not per person. Feel free to click on link to validate. Often the 'entry ticket' for going to a party, any party, is to come as a couple. Once in, you can park the person you've brought into a corner and never see them again until it's time to leave. As described by the OP, no play at home, yet playing with other people at parties - what possible other conclusion is there? I've never considered truth or reality "ugly" or even "harsh" no matter the source or method it was delivered. There is a whole lot more truth needed in the world and between people no matter what adjective modifier is used before the word. When you boil away the BS of disclosing 'harsh reality' you left with a pot of 'reality'. I've found it's better and less time consuming to not water it down in the first place. Edited to add: Granted this is an assumption but based upon the facts presented as evidence, I'm going to assume that at some point, this 'master' took, or takes, the 'Master's Privilege' position regarding what he is doing. As others have said, at worst that's abusive, at best it's bullshit. However for each and every consensual D/s relationship, especially in this case where the principles are not living together; for every instance of abuse or bullshit there must be a corresponding enabler. Once again - I see this as yet another example of all individuals involved in any relationship, 24/7 or 1 hour of 365 days, needing to come into the relationship with self confidence and personal integrity. You can't think this will be your last 'Dom'/'Master', or your last 'submissive'/'slave'. Nobody deserves to be treated this way. Not referring to the specific treatment of ignoring a submissive or slave at a party event; but the bigger picture of being strung along and representing there is at the foundation of this situation a 'relationship' being served by all involved, fulfilling all involved as agreed to when it was formed.
< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 6/30/2010 12:08:09 PM >
|