Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing'


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 8:36:53 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

WASHINGTON – Republican chairman Michael Steele drew criticism from within his own party Friday, including calls to resign, after saying the 9-year-old commitment of U.S. troops to Afghanistan was a mistaken "war of Obama's choosing." As criticism swelled, Steele issued a statement stressing his support for U.S. troops, but he did not acknowledge his factual error about a war launched by former President George W. Bush in response to the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. A senior official in Bush's administration said it would be impossible for the Republican National Committee to speak with credibility on foreign policy if Steele remained chairman.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100703/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_republican_chairman_afghanistan;_ylt=ApXluEXdiKEE0gjPS.qKhMV34T0D;_ylu=X3oDMTMzMzY4ZW9sBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwNzAzL3VzX3JlcHVibGljYW5fY2hhaXJtYW5fYWZnaGFuaXN0YW4EY3BvcwMxBHBvcwMyBHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrA2dvcGNoYWlybWFuYQ--

Now, who was it that got us into a war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and managed to get us bogged down in trying to fight insurgents?  It sure wasn't Obama.

This is the Conservative Republicans trying to rewrite history... again.

quote:

Michael Steele causes uproar with Afghan remarks Reuters – Fri Jul 2, 3:22 pm ET   AFP/File WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican Party leader Michael Steele faced heavy criticism and calls for his resignation on Friday after blaming President Barack Obama for the Afghanistan war and suggesting it could not be won. Full Story »



< Message edited by jlf1961 -- 7/2/2010 8:39:31 PM >


_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 8:48:45 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
Crap, you beat me to it! =(

Yeah, Mr. Steele vs. Mr. Obama in a history debate, would be like Mr. George W. Bush vs Mr. Steven Hawkins in a astronomy debate. No Contest!

Well, for most of the world, you are correct, jlf1961. But conservatives these days, are not among the most educated, knowledgable or wise crowd. Likewise, in the same speech he made another screw up of history:

"If he's such a student of history, has he not understood that, you know, that's the one thing you don't do is engage in a land war in Afghanistan? All right? Because everyone who's tried, over a thousand years of history, has failed"

Its a land war with RUSSIA! Personally, I think the only reason Mr. Steele was given the job, was due largely because of Obama. Obama got elected by the Democrats, so the GOP wanted/needed an image that didnt say "we not just a bunch of old, rich, bigotry, farts with no useful ideas". So, they hired Mr. Steele, who has proved to be as useless as the rest of them.

I say, they should keep him at his current job! Democrats need all the help they can get, given the usual events of mid-term elections of the pass.

< Message edited by joether -- 7/2/2010 8:49:21 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 9:01:29 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
I think it was MacArthur, and the reference was to a "land war in Asia."

Steele is correct that President Obama made a choice to escalate in Afghanistan, and has made it "his" war. That he is unwilling to utter the word "victory," even when addressing the West Pointers he orders to go there and die does not speak well of him.

This notion that conservatives are in lockstep regarding our efforts there is nonsense.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 9:07:01 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
So If Obama let it continue to devolve and fall apart,we could still call it bush`s war?

You really are quite a loser,aren`t you dick,...I mean rich.

Obama made a choice to win the war.

Your guy bush(miss him yet?),made a choice to lose it,with your blessings.


< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/2/2010 9:20:45 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 9:17:28 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


Obama made a choice to win the war.




Right, Basiji.

With precisely the same Bush strategy that he declared would fail, under the same General he refused to vote in support of when you thought it was funny to see him called General Betrayus. Of course, Afghanistan is a very different place than Iraq.

You're straight out of an Orwell novel. Maybe if you get a new avatar, it will be of the spokeshole pig from Animal Farm?

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 9:18:57 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Translation=

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 9:38:49 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
I gotta suck it up and agree with Rich on this one, Owner. Obama made a decision during his campaign rhetoric to set himself off from Bush. After he was elected he studied the matter for months, let himself be persuaded by the generals, and then reluctantly agreed to compromise numbers of new troops with a withdrawal date that is no longer a withdrawal date. What a mistake.

He is fighting a war against the Taliban, who are not a monolith but a diverse group of Pashtun tribes, for the purpose of driving out al Quaida who has already departed according to Leon Peneta and taken up residence elsewhere. We are spending hundreds of billions of dollars and coalition lives to support a corrupt govt that stole the election and is funneling billions of bucks outta the country which we wish to make into a western democracy from a wide patch in the road. Oh hell, they don't even have roads. So, we will build roads for them while our infra-structure crumbles.

Once again we are mired in a foreign land with an obscure mission and a vanashing exit strategy.

Fuck all. Our Pols are so stupid.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/2/2010 9:49:23 PM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline
Bush should have thought about not leaving Afghanistan before the "Mission was Accomplished." He never should have invaded Iraq - which had nothing to do with 9/11. Bush, Cheney, Rummy, etc. should all be in jail, but again like I said before the law is not the same for everybody.
Bill

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 12:27:32 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

I gotta suck it up and agree with Rich on this one, Owner. Obama made a decision during his campaign rhetoric to set himself off from Bush. After he was elected he studied the matter for months, let himself be persuaded by the generals, and then reluctantly agreed to compromise numbers of new troops with a withdrawal date that is no longer a withdrawal date. What a mistake.

He is fighting a war against the Taliban, who are not a monolith but a diverse group of Pashtun tribes, for the purpose of driving out al Quaida who has already departed according to Leon Peneta and taken up residence elsewhere. We are spending hundreds of billions of dollars and coalition lives to support a corrupt govt that stole the election and is funneling billions of bucks outta the country which we wish to make into a western democracy from a wide patch in the road. Oh hell, they don't even have roads. So, we will build roads for them while our infra-structure crumbles.

Once again we are mired in a foreign land with an obscure mission and a vanashing exit strategy.

Fuck all. Our Pols are so stupid.



I have to respectfully disagree.Yes Obama did say he would change strategy and he did.He campaigned on it and got flack from McGramps and the rest over it.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/15/mccain.foreign.policy/index.html

On day one practically,he sent more troops and equipment there.The military`s request for more troops got a no from the cheney administration,but a yes from the Obama admin.It was the right thing to do,after years of neglect by dick bush.

Obama said from day one that he`d end the Iraq war(responsibly)and would send more troops to the real war on terror,Afghanistan.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/15/obama.iraq/index.html

"Sen. Barack Obama called the war in Iraq a "dangerous distraction" Tuesday and said more emphasis must be placed on the battle in Afghanistan.

"As should have been apparent to President Bush and Sen. [John] McCain, the central front in the war on terror is not Iraq, and it never was," Obama said in what his campaign called a major policy address on Iraq, Afghanistan and national security.

Obama said that part of his new strategy will be "taking the fight to al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan."

Shortly after Obama's speech, McCain attacked the Illinois senator's opposition to the surge policy in Iraq and highlighted his own proposal for victory in Afghanistan. Read what McCain says about Obama's plan

"Sen. Obama is departing soon on a trip abroad that will include a fact-finding mission to Iraq and Afghanistan. And I note that he is speaking today about his plans for Iraq and Afghanistan before he has even left, before he has talked to Gen. [David] Petraeus, before he has seen the progress in Iraq and before he has set foot in Afghanistan for the first time," McCain said."

"In my experience, fact-finding missions usually work best the other way around: First, you assess the facts on the ground; then you present a new strategy."

Obama said that on his first day in office he would give the military a new mission: ending the war in Iraq"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

His West Point speech on Afghanistan will explain a lot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN4E0rs27JQ&feature=fvw

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



I understand that there are those who are against war in general and don`t believe in it, as a rule.I respect that.War is the very very very last thing that should be done.Not the 1st.

There`s a good argument for using restraint and being ultra careful that the mission and decision to go to war is worthy of the young man and women who will be doing the dying and killing.

But there are times when we must fight.But we had better fucking made sure we have to.Not just want to,ie bush.

As the President has said,our enemies are planning attacks as we type.They`re on the Afghan-Pakistan mountain border and we must not allow them any rest.We`re not fighting all of Afghanistan or all of it`s hundreds of tribes.We are fight 2 or 3 tribes along the border w/ Pakistan.

Given some time and a serious forum,I think I could convince a peace lover that the Afhgan mission is worthy.

~~~~~~~~~~

But Steele,rich and the other extremists aren`t peacenicks or for getting the 9/11 perps either, or for preventing further attacks.



They are more concerned and interested with bashing the President.



But that`s cool.Like I said,our best weapon against republicans is to let republicans talk.

So far everyone, including many republicans want Steele to quit.

Everyone except the party`s radicals,like rich and wilbur and luckydog.They agree with Steele.

This is perfect,tho.Right before the election,the head of the GOP get`s sacked and a new one must be elected and take over.It`ll be months before the new guy get`s up to speed.

Or Steele will stay and provide a great target and distraction.

Lots of tumult and angst.Lots of news stories and questions.Questions about the GObP`s ability to govern.



Like Sarah,this is another gift from God .

added for context:

It`s not just our troops in the fight,either.

Today I heard on NPR today that Pakistan`s oldest mosque(more than 1100 years old) was bombed,killing 40 and wounding many more.It was a mosque of a moderate Muslim sect that was very liberal,allowing non-Muslims inside along with many other liberal traditions that go against Wahhabi-ism,the fundie belief system of the radicals/terrorists.


< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/3/2010 12:46:22 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 6:57:37 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

On day one practically,he sent more troops and equipment there.The military`s request for more troops got a no from the cheney administration,but a yes from the Obama admin.It was the right thing to do,after years of neglect by dick bush.

Obama said from day one that he`d end the Iraq war(responsibly)and would send more troops to the real war on terror,Afghanistan.


So, our disagreement seems to be over whether Obama worked out his plan before or after he was elected. I will accept your position that it was before.

How does that change the miscalculation and the fiction that "the real war on terror" is in Afghanistan. The CIA admits now there are only 50 - 100 Al Quaida members in that shit hole. The central govt is corrupt, stole the election and is not trusted by the Pashtun, so we are once more in the midst of a bit of a civil war.

Keep an eye out for upcoming hearings by Congresswoman Nita Lowry's Appropriations subcommitee regarding the transfer of $Billions from Afghanistan to Dubai if you wish to know how seriously we are being ripped off. Damn! We are paying the Pashtun to refrain from attacking our supply lines. What a freakin' joke.

Terror has no locus. That's why it is terror. The real war on terror is afghanistan? That was so 2003 wasn't it? Time to declare victory and move on. Fuk Afghanistan. We have no vital national security interest there.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 7:07:20 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
Assuming that there was ANY thought behind Steele's statement, the only explanation is that the Afghan was is considered unwinnable and that he's attempting to rewrite history to separate it from being part of the Bush legacy.

'Course, it's probably just him misstating something.

It would truly be odd if the Dems could accuse the GOP of being soft on terrorism and unpatriotic for a change.  Note his timing - right before July 4.


_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 7:12:12 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
During his campaign Obama deemed the Iraq War a war of choice (Bush's wrong choice of course) and the Afghanistan War a war of necessity, and promised as POTUS he would therefore redeploy our troops from Iraq to Afghanistan. GOP Chairman Michael Steele was therefore absolutely correct to say the Afghanistan war is Obama's war of choosing. Obamabots simply can't handle plaing and simple facts/truths.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 7:39:17 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Gosh, you mean the president stepped into the situation before him instead of whining that he voted against invading Afghanistan in the first place?

Damn. What a loser.

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 7:47:23 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Gosh, you mean the president stepped into the situation before him instead of whining that he voted against invading Afghanistan in the first place?

Damn. What a loser.

THIS


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 8:42:45 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

During his campaign Obama deemed the Iraq War a war of choice (Bush's wrong choice of course) and the Afghanistan War a war of necessity, and promised as POTUS he would therefore redeploy our troops from Iraq to Afghanistan. GOP Chairman Michael Steele was therefore absolutely correct to say the Afghanistan war is Obama's war of choosing. Obamabots simply can't handle plaing and simple facts/truths.


Iraq will always be thought of as Bush's war.  He misrepresented the threat, he ignored serious opposition from the international community, and the Dems have pinned the albatross on him.

While Obama has accepted that he could have done the same, keep in mind that he was not the one who invaded Afghanistan.  It is Bush's war as well, although maybe he and Obama will end up sharing the blame for it.


_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 9:25:52 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
Did he not have the option to begin an immediate draw down? I think so. Except he said the opposite during his campaign so Hillary and John would not outflank him on the right.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 9:28:03 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
How does this address the point I raised?

Changes it not a bit.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 9:37:00 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
In a way...the charges are correct but for different reasons than any repub will admit.

For Bush & Co. these 'wars' were wars for profit...PROFIT and were NEVER supposed to end. Now these wars are REAL wars that we must at least try to win and not simply to generate a profit but...to get the hell out.

Then, when one has so many such wars inherited from from the last admin. (Bush & Co.) to choose from soon as you take the oath...why not Afghan. ? Cash flow and profits are winding down in Iraq...so ?

I love how the republican 'leadership' continues to not only suffer hoof-in-mouth disease but the ridiculous continuing hypocrisy trying to blame their immense policy failures since 2000 on the dems now because the great Obama understands priorities.

So Obama brings in a full tool-set, men and material that should have been deployed in the first place to one of those wars, it is now 'his' war and because he hasn't fixed all of those failures, shame on him for not ending at least one of the most incompetent military adventures in our history...in a few mos.

Bush having simply chased the rabbits to Pakistan...there we go a'rabbit hunt'n.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 7/3/2010 9:38:28 AM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 10:30:21 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

On day one practically,he sent more troops and equipment there.The military`s request for more troops got a no from the cheney administration,but a yes from the Obama admin.It was the right thing to do,after years of neglect by dick bush.

Obama said from day one that he`d end the Iraq war(responsibly)and would send more troops to the real war on terror,Afghanistan.


So, our disagreement seems to be over whether Obama worked out his plan before or after he was elected. I will accept your position that it was before.

How does that change the miscalculation and the fiction that "the real war on terror" is in Afghanistan. The CIA admits now there are only 50 - 100 Al Quaida members in that shit hole. The central govt is corrupt, stole the election and is not trusted by the Pashtun, so we are once more in the midst of a bit of a civil war.

Keep an eye out for upcoming hearings by Congresswoman Nita Lowry's Appropriations subcommitee regarding the transfer of $Billions from Afghanistan to Dubai if you wish to know how seriously we are being ripped off. Damn! We are paying the Pashtun to refrain from attacking our supply lines. What a freakin' joke.

Terror has no locus. That's why it is terror. The real war on terror is afghanistan? That was so 2003 wasn't it? Time to declare victory and move on. Fuk Afghanistan. We have no vital national security interest there.
,

Good points all.What I mean by the real war on terror regarding Afghanistan and Pakistan, is in comparison with the Iraq/lie/fuck-up/distraction.And how Iraq , ruined our efforts to find bin laden or to stop the Taliban from reconstituting.

The war on terror is world wide.It is not just military.AL quada has no army.That`s why it`s both a law enforcement issue and a military one (I`ll point out that rich and his buddies squealed like pigs when Obama said the war on terror is both a military and law enforcement task).

True,as the CIA has confirmed,the assholes have been forced out, technically(which is a victory,of sorts)and live along a narrow corridor between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Mostly to the Pakistan side.Where,they are getting hammered be elements of the Pakistan army.The Pakistanis arena`t fighting the assholes for our purposes but for their own reasons.We are also doing huge damage using UN-manned killer drones.We`ve killed quite a few top ranking jihadis this way.

The Taliban and al quada are killing far more Pakistanis and Afghans than anyone else.The NATO/Taliban fight is not the only fight going on,by far.There are pitched battles all along the border between the Pakistan army and the assholes.And there`s the recent mosque bombing, I mentioned.There is a lot of jihadis blowing up non-combatants there,and the jihadis are losing the PR battle,big time.

As to the Taliban fight,we`re not fighting every Taliban member.It`s more tribal than political.There are efforts to make peace with most of them or at least sap the jihadis of fresh faces by lewering them off the battle field.


For the jihadis,the new strategy is more face to face fighting (a lot more)with systematic taking over of the areas they operate(d) in and not giving them back.Which means less reliance on aerial bombing from a far(and less associated innocent deaths).But this face to face, in-close fighting also means more US and NATO soldiers killed.

The bush policy of relaying long distance bombing was a disaster.We seemed to killed everyone but the assholes.It was becoming clear that the jihadis were passing bad info purposely ,tricking us into killing whole wedding parties and bombing villages full of non-combatants.Obama also got a lot of flack for pointing this out during the campaign.How dare he "criticize the troops",when it was bush`s lame strategy that Obama was bashing.



I don`t have a link, I`m sure it`s out there,but I heard the President say that bin-laden and co. are currently planning attacks on us and on our allies.50 to 100 is all that`s neccessary to do damage .
If we pull out,they will reestablish and do more harm to more people.I believe Obama and take him at his word that this is true.

Now is no time to stop or do less.We need to let the plan work before making a decision to scale back or rethink what our goals should be.

This is the longest war in American history.One reason for that is the neo-cons neglected the effort(Iraq distraction)and let a remarkable victory over the Taliban unravel to the point that they have taken control over large parts of the country.

And I`m aware that most of the resistance Obama will have to his Afghan plan will come from the left and middle.The wasted years and they`re impact will be one of the obstacles Obama must over come.But I believe he can explain it honestly and convince folks that is the right course.

What we won`t see is Obama browbeating or attempting to shame people into action or lying to them to trick them into action.

It will be an honest debate and I look forward to it.It`s one we must have.I also look forward to embarrassing rich and his pals with their own words.


< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/3/2010 11:02:40 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' - 7/3/2010 12:57:56 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

I don`t have a link, I`m sure it`s out there,but I heard the President say that bin-laden and co. are currently planning attacks on us and on our allies.50 to 100 is all that`s neccessary to do damage .
If we pull out,they will reestablish and do more harm to more people.I believe Obama and take him at his word that this is true.


Owner, I cannot do justice to your long and thoughtful post. However, let me remind you that the Twin Towers attackers originated their plans in Hamburg. They were not primatives hiding in some mountainous region the size of California. To send 90 thousand Nato forces into harm's way based on questionable intell that 50 or so mean to strike us from a remote cave somewhere strikes me as pretty absurd.

The money spent so wastefully in massive troop deployment, bogus nation building, and bribery could well be spent building up our homeland defenses. As long as we have the affrontery to occupy Islamic lands with "infidel" troops we will remain the target of radical Islam.

I have no doubt we will be struck again. It may or may not be more painful. However, I think we are fighting the wrong war with the wrong tactics in the wrong place. Terrorism is here. This is where we should fight it. On our own land with well developed agencies like the NYC anti-terrorist investigation squad. Petreaus is fighting yesterday's wars. If only he would ask me

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> GOP chairman: Afghan 'war of Obama's choosing' Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109