RE: arrrgh!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message

ownedgirlie -> RE: arrrgh!! (4/16/2006 9:20:30 AM)

i don't think Master and i have ever even mentioned this motto.  i either trust him or i don't.  If i do, i don't need a motto.  If i don't, i shouldn't be his.



Proprietrix -> RE: SSC? (4/16/2006 9:52:27 AM)

I don't practice SSC.
It's too relative.
It's too subjective.
It's too broadly defined.
It's improperly defined ("sane" is a legal term, not a psychological one).
It's someone else's mantra and has no bearing on my life or my relationships.

I see it kind of like the boy scout motto. It's great for the particular group who practices it, but really doesn't relate to me at all.



BrutalAntipathy -> RE: SSC? (4/16/2006 10:00:01 AM)

I prefer RACK, or risk aware consensual kink.



mixielicous -> RE: arrrgh!! (4/16/2006 10:54:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssPassion

SSC thread


[sm=ugh.gif] OH GOD MAKE IT GO AWAY!!!

(here is a link that will educate many about this acronym)

http://sensuoussadie.com/interviews/davidsteininterview.htm



yes i have read the other thread, wich was on ssc in general. i hadnt meant for this to become a great debate on the topic, rather if it could be applied to a slave who had submitted, if someone who claims to pratice this had the opinion that they truely submit.

ah oh well.



kyraofMists -> RE: SSC? (4/16/2006 10:58:08 AM)

My interpretation of your question is that you are asking about the concept of consent within an M/s relationship, so I am going to answer it based on that. 

How it works in my relationship is that when I started a relationship with him I consented to allow him to do is will.  That consent was given for many reasons and we both took the time to make sure that I was as informed as possible on what I was consenting to.  I also make the choice to consent every time I am told to do something or anytime he wants to do something to me.  At anytime I can say no and then that will in effect end the M/s relationship.  Once I remove his consent to do whatever he wants, then I have ended the relationship.

For us, consent was given explicitly and clearly once when I asked to be his and it is given implicitly each time I don’t say no.

Hope that this answers the question you were asking... 

Knight's kyra



enthralled -> RE: arrrgh!! (4/16/2006 12:28:06 PM)

Well . . . guess I'm going to stick out like a sore thumb because I don't apply SSC to myself and my scenes; instead, I go by RACK - Risk Aware Consensual Kink.
The reason I changed my perception is this: nothing I do is really 'safe' when I think about it. And face it, half of it isnt sane! <lol>. . . and consensual is common sense unless its abuse.
With RACK- I'm aware of the risks involved in what I do, it's consensual, and of course it's kinky! [:D]

Respectfully,
enthralled



twicehappy -> RE: SSC? (4/16/2006 3:15:28 PM)

Safe, Sane and Consensual is indeed a byword for most in the lifestyle. The way i see it relates to the M/M/s dynamic we have in our home is that in accepting the collar i consented to their every desire that once, instead of every time as is usual for casual play. As to the safe and sane part, i take that as a given. My Master and Mistress own me, they love me, and of course i trust them implicitly to keep me safe.

If you break your toys, how will you play with them the next day?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125