|
cuckoldmepls -> Eyeblast TV (7/12/2010 9:21:34 AM)
|
www.eyeblast.tv Exposing the Liberal Media
The Newsbusters videos are really good, but they d/l rather slowly. They are like Saturday Night Live News Skits, only exposing the Liberals.
As we all know, every major network except fox has an obvious liberal bias since they refuse to represent the opinions of the majority of Americans and expose the open borders, unconstitutional government, socialist agenda. I just heard today that if the current deficits continue, we will be paying $2 trillion in interest on the national debt each year by 2020. That is not a misprint. That's far worse than what I had been quoting which was a half trillion in interest that we would soon be paying, but I guess that was based on earlier estimates. What this means is that by running up the debt, we are helping to enrich other countries, wealthy people abroad, and wealthy people here at home who buy our debt. The very people that liberals despise the most.
Now if we go by the earlier estimate on how much interest we will be paying, and divide that up among 50 states, that is $10 billion dollars annually that each state could have and spend it as they see fit whether it be on infrastructure or social programs.
If we go by the new estimates on how much interest we will be paying, and divide that up among 50 states, that is $40 billion dollars annually that each state could have to spend as they want. If you don't believe me, just use your calculator function in accessories. It's $2,000,000,000,000 / 50
It's totally unbelieveable that people can't see what is happening. They are simply getting us in deeper and deeper with uncontrolled federal spending. You can argue all you want about whether to raise taxes or not, but as the Congressional Budget Office stated, "it really won't matter whether you raise or lower taxes, if you don't control spending first."
As far as I'm concerned, the federal government should restrict themselves to only a handful of programs such as national defense, nasa, cia, nsa, center for disease control and maybe a few others, and the rest should be reserved to the states just as the 10th amendment calls for. If this were the case, I'm fairly confident that our federal taxes could be lowered to 10% for the federal government, and if the state governments practiced the same principles of allowing local government to handle their own problems, we could lower their taxes to 10% as well.
If the local governments need more money, why don't they just write more tickets like they used to??? Besides, the more traffic stops you make, the more criminal activity you find. Most criminals are too lazy to walk or ride a bike.
Now some people will claim republicans ran up the debt too, and that is partly correct. The truth is that these republicans were not true conservatives. Bush was not a true conservative as evidenced by his medicare prescription drug program he passed. True conservatives don't subsidize specific groups like Illegal Aliens, senior citizens, and lazy white people, so they can get their vote. That is a democratic method of operation, that republicans like Bush have adopted. If true conservatives were in charge there would be no national debt, and people would be forced to live within their means just like the government should. There would be no illusionary economy either. But the best part is, that when we did have recessions, once we recovered we would be as good as new and it would be a healthy recovery. The fact is, that you simply can't spend your way to long term prosperity when you are already in debt.
By the way Bush did have a war to fight since we were attacked on our home soil, and just like the cold war, it is acceptable to go into debt to win wars, although we should have been able to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan without running up the debt. The cold war was another story. We had to win that no matter what the costs, and thanks to Reagan, you and your children have not had to worry about nuclear annihilation for 20 years now.
Keep in mind too, that if we had known Obama was going to spend our money like a drunk sailor to keep the illusion going, most people would have supported Bush's Mission to Mars. It's far better to spend money on worthwhile projects where you accomplish something and it creates jobs than to spend money on permanent welfare. Once forgotton example is where the democrats tried to expand the schip program into the middle class. My God people, if you can't get your ass out of bed in the morning to feed your kids breakfast before sending them off to school, you deserve a kick in the ass. Especially since you are already on food stamps any way. When I was a kid, we had reduced or free lunches for poor families, but not for breakfast. So you see, every program the democrats (and sometimes republicans) start, eventually gets expanded and ends up sucking the life blood out of taxpayers. This is why government is the problem, not the solution.
|
|
|
|
