alwayssummer
Posts: 89
Joined: 9/13/2008 Status: offline
|
Yes,to eliminate the taxable income cap would be devine. Just thought the "raise" notion was more, um, palatable. I just wish that all the misinformation, unfounded hysteria about this fund would stop. Same "it's bankrupt" bullshit. No it's stolen! They shouldn't cut benefits by raising the age - it's already been stretched to an impossible age for someone who really works hard for a living. i.e. tell waitresses they need to work to seventy or a roofer for example. They've already pushed it to 67+, which is old for many an hard working body. It's the "subsidized" hedgefund gazillionaires like Peterson(most powerful, richest, lifelongest enemy of soc sec, Catfood Commission Pariah ) and these old fart, obscenely rich Senators & Reps, who won't give up their gravy train jobs and retire, who think everybody should just work longer. Term limits please. The Congress does not even pay into social security - they have their own system. And,absolutely, allowed ours to be stolen. And now refuse to make a move to collect our money. Because the majority of them do not give a shit. They've got theirs. Why didn't we borrow from their fund instead? They voted for the wars, let them pay us back from their fund too. I'm sure it's deep pockets. Sure eliminate the cap alltogether on soc sec taxable annual income.. That'd be swell. I agree. They should also eliminate the cap on supplemental earned income people can make while receiving soc security. Right now it's a pathetic $14,000/year normal taxable income...wow, another lap of luxury for the elderly. Yet capital gains have no earnings cap/year for getting a full social security check. So how about take the cap off of annual income to be taxed and put it on cap gains income to get benefits? It's too bad that the under 50s, who this most effects, have so little say in their old age security net. The Cat Food Commission and all these rich and virulent old Legislators remind me of the "town elders", willfully ignorant, callous Draft Boards of the 60's.No skin in the game or desire to really represent the truth. But happy to drop the ax on the younger and less powerful. It gives me non drug induced flashbacks, truly Thanks about the "nic" remark. Not sure what that is, but I'll take it as a compliment.
|