|
fipsie69 -> RE: New Mass. Obscenity Law -- CAUTION! (7/14/2010 12:48:53 PM)
|
quote:
Still, at least they have a written constitution that they can throw at the powers that be. We could do with one of those in the UK.
The "US Constitution" is a lovely idea from the colonies, pity it gets ignored all the time.
Wouldn't make any difference if we (UK) did have one as we're British Subjects!! Subjects of the Crown, Queenie's little subs, she could what she wanted with us - theoretically. Mind the French royal family tried that and look where it got them [sm=axe.gif] (couldn't find a guillotine smiley - Holly?)
Have you see this:
British law does not recognize the possibility of consenting to bodily injury. Such acts are illegal, even between consenting adults, and these laws are enforced. In the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill 2007, the British Government cited the Spanner case as justification for criminalizing images of consensual acts, as part of its proposed criminalization of possession of "extreme pornography".
So, as I understand it, you can't even look at someone being spanked, let alone do it!! Aaaaaa - freedom, democracy: words used to sell records, nothing more these days.
I'm glad I don't live in either country.
Sorry to be such a bundle of joy this evening but it really gets up my nose. I pay a massive amount of tax and expect 1st World governments (or European ones at least) to do what I want not the other way round. They work for ME!! Grrrrr
ok they can work for the rest of you too, sometimes
|
|
|
|
