Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
More plausible? Are you actually claiming someone who had the right few seconds would preserve it for posterity knowing if it got out it would make his political allies look bad?
It's bad enough you flat out made up ypur own math but now you're denying pretty basic human nature.
Youre loony. Someone with that on video would think it was so fucking cool he'd be showing all his friends. Keep grasping, like on your BP error.
I* notice you failed to point out any actual error. Nothing I wrote over there was in error unlike you who has gone to great lengths to avoid admitting you screwed up a simple multiplication.
Define it how you like. You were 100% wrong about the 20 billion in anyway increasing BPs exposure above the 75 million cap. I call that an error. I still havent seen any error in multipication, just your attempting to justify a false claim about tax cuts using inflation that has nothing to do with the tax cuts (other than it being improved by them).
And btw, its interesting that HuffPo, which would love to blast the tea party out of the water, posted their 10 most offensive signs they could find, and only one of them could be considered overtly racist, and even that can be argued to be a cultural reference rather than race related. But even if the former, no one has ever argued that there arent racists that find there way into every organization.
There has been simply no shred of evidence presented that the tea party (ignoring that the tea party is far from monolithic to start with) is endemically racist.
Well,then there was the Obama is a Muslim smear campaign,then the birther stuff,which is more of the same appeal to racial fear,then new black panther dirty tricks shit which is more racist smear stuff which is all radical-right tea bagger poop.
The NAACP didn`t say the tea party was racist.But that parts were/are and the leaders had to acknowledge that and act on that.The movement is to diverse for that.Ron Paul,the father of the movement is many things but he`s not a racists.His son????Not so sure about him.
PAhunk is NOT a racist.He`s many things (including tea partier) but we love him and know that hate is just not part of him.
The President has said he agrees with that part of the movement that has a sincere concern about the size of gov. and the debt.That`s a legitimate debate.It`s not those folks that the NAACP resolved against.And said so.
It was the segment that undeniably is,as demonstrated by Mark Williams`s not to Abe,that they are talking about.
Wilbur and rich and their buddie`s denial is exactly sort of denial that worries the NAACP.
They aren`t saying everyone in the tea party is racist, it's the inability to recognize and call out the racism in their midst that`s the problem.It`s like kriptonite to them.
Live by the wedge issue,die by the wedge issue.
_____________________________
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"
President Obama
|
RE: tea-bagger responds to NAACP resolution with really... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread