PeonForHer -> RE: "tired of the players but.... here is simething ridiculous!" (7/19/2010 7:25:11 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer Yes, it was a seriously unpleasant thing for me to do. However, I'm quite glad that I did it, because she was a being a seriously unpleasant little twat in her profile. I do very much hope that I caused her distress. And it would be different if she'd messaged you, but she hadn't-you sent her a malicious straight out of the blue. I repeat what I said before-she could have been exaggerating, she could have been teasing, or she could have been playing to a market that doesn't include you-like windchymes said, no matter what you write *someone*'s jerking off to it. Who are you to dictate what wank material other people can and can't put out? The fact that you're defending deliberately upsetting someone who has never contacted you under the guise of some righteous crusade against something you don't even know is real makes me think less of you, Peon. I'm sorry that you feel that way, VC, but it it doesn't change my feelings nor my opinion of the Domme in question. I get what you're trying to achieve by invoking the 'who are you to judge what other people get off on' line, but it doesn't wash. It doesn't matter to me what people get off on, so long as it isn't ultimately dangerous. I'm quite sure that some men, maybe lots of men, will have frenziedly tried to get together with her, precisely because of her far-out, ultra-sadistic profile. That doesn't alter the fact, though, that she was a nitwit who wasn't remotely ready to dominate anyone. Handing over the power of dominance to her would have been like giving a machine gun to a toddler. I must say: all I did was write one cmail to her that, no doubt, put the wind up her. Nonetheless, I'd hardly call that a crusade. She'll have got over it and learned, hopefully rapidly, that not all malesubs are as mad as she'd like them to be. I was a lot more lenient on her, in fact, than some Domme friends of mine thought I should have been. You, on the other hand, are defending a woman here who a) was clearly being nutty and stupid and b) you don't know whatsoever. You, though, seem to be on a bit of a crusade here, yourself. You're not a silly, childish woman - not by far - so why are you defending some anonymous woman who is? I've seen you weigh in against peabrained 'Dommes' here on the boards. In fact, I've seen you being almost surprisingly (but rightly) quite heavy on them. So . . . what gives, in this particular case?
|
|
|
|